Things are getting a bit spotty with the 500/4 Nikkor!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Bill Graham on 2 Aug 2010 22:11 "Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote in message news:iYOdnfksNrzmxMvRnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > Superzooms Still Win wrote: >> perfectly representing the true scene > > Only for a creature with eyes a quarter inch apart. Photographers in the distant future will have eyes on the ends of extensions, like hammerhead sharks.......
From: SneakyP on 3 Aug 2010 01:10 "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote in news:i32vbk$n2k$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > > "Superzooms Still Win" <ssw(a)noaddress.org> (the P&S Troll morphs yet again) wrote in message > news:dou956h5f9r0ro571nd3dc1n8fv5f92i6t(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:30:23 -0400, "Tim Conway" >> <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Larry Thong" <larry_thong(a)shitstring.com> wrote in message >>>news:o8GdnRoVeqeTR8nRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)supernews.com... >>>> Well, maybe just a little spotty. >>>> >>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Spots.jpg> >>>> >>>Nice shot. Just needs a catchlight in the eyes. ;-) >> >> Blue foliage, red fur, someone sorely needs a camera, monitor, or >> eyes adjusted. Did anyone mention the worthless underexposed >> composition yet? Interesting that the leaves in front are more in >> focus than the deer. Looks >> like its just as much of a problem with camera and lenses as it is >> the snapshooter. >> >> <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4109/4847902759_058421b547_b.jpg> > > No. Rita's is better by far. And the leaves aren't blue. > What I see is a chickenshit loser troll who can't keep his pictures copyrighted, and paranoia confirms this troll's diagnosis with the website's "This Photo Is Currently Unavailable" blurb. Probably doesn't last longer than a few minutes. two minutes it's there, then it's not. What a dumb outed troll loser this thing has been for the past several years. It can't stand itself when you stop replying to it. -- SneakyP To email me, you know what to do.
From: SneakyP on 3 Aug 2010 01:14 George Kerby <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:C87AF21B.3A407%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com: > > > > On 8/1/10 12:05 AM, in article > i32vbk$n2k$1(a)news.eternal-september.org, "Tim Conway" > <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >> >> "Superzooms Still Win" <ssw(a)noaddress.org> wrote in message >> news:dou956h5f9r0ro571nd3dc1n8fv5f92i6t(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:30:23 -0400, "Tim Conway" >>> <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> "Larry Thong" <larry_thong(a)shitstring.com> wrote in message >>>> news:o8GdnRoVeqeTR8nRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)supernews.com... >>>>> Well, maybe just a little spotty. >>>>> >>>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Spots.jpg> >>>>> >>>> Nice shot. Just needs a catchlight in the eyes. ;-) >>> >>> >>> <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4109/4847902759_058421b547_b.jpg> >> >> No. Rita's is better by far. And the leaves aren't blue. >> > Our troll has many problems - including a monitor phase issue. Perchance a "hue" induced shifting caused by dropping acid or snorting shrooms? I don't have the experience to know what his problem is. IOW - It's not the equipent that is the problem. I think SuperShrooms does. -- SneakyP To email me, you know what to do.
From: LOL! on 3 Aug 2010 02:15
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:10:23 -0500, SneakyP the pretend-photographer troll <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote: >"Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote in >news:i32vbk$n2k$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >> >> "Superzooms Still Win" <ssw(a)noaddress.org> wrote in message >> news:dou956h5f9r0ro571nd3dc1n8fv5f92i6t(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:30:23 -0400, "Tim Conway" >>> <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"Larry Thong" <larry_thong(a)shitstring.com> wrote in message >>>>news:o8GdnRoVeqeTR8nRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)supernews.com... >>>>> Well, maybe just a little spotty. >>>>> >>>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Spots.jpg> >>>>> >>>>Nice shot. Just needs a catchlight in the eyes. ;-) >>> >>> Blue foliage, red fur, someone sorely needs a camera, monitor, or >>> eyes adjusted. Did anyone mention the worthless underexposed >>> composition yet? Interesting that the leaves in front are more in >>> focus than the deer. Looks >>> like its just as much of a problem with camera and lenses as it is >>> the snapshooter. >>> >>> <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4109/4847902759_058421b547_b.jpg> >> >> No. Rita's is better by far. And the leaves aren't blue. >> > >What I see is a chickenshit loser troll who can't keep his pictures >copyrighted, and paranoia confirms this troll's diagnosis with the >website's "This Photo Is Currently Unavailable" blurb. Probably doesn't >last longer than a few minutes. > >two minutes it's there, then it's not. It was up for over 24 hours. Did you miss it? Awww.... too bad. Poor little you. Like you missed the fact that someone's monitor phase problem will not appear in a JPG edited on that monitor too? LOL! You got TROLLED by one of your fellow pretend-photographer TROLLS. LOL!!!!!!!!!! Try again you pathetic pretend-photographer TROLL. LOL! |