Things are getting a bit spotty with the 500/4 Nikkor!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Allen on 2 Aug 2010 11:06 Paul Furman wrote: <snip wonderful material> That truly made me LOL! (Not my nym, by the way.) Allen
From: Peter on 2 Aug 2010 11:31 "Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote in message news:Se2dnSZINO6GQ8vRnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > otter wrote: >> On Aug 2, 5:06 am, "Peter"<peter...(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >>> "Paul Furman"<pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote in message >>> news:edidnQVbV_OHw8vRnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>> >>> >>>> I combined those two for your recipe... >>> >>> Paul, I don't understand why you take it seriously. >>> >> Better to not feed it. > > Yeah, I know - hard to resist though once in a while. > Done that myself. Every so often we get the urge to play with something at a very low level. -- Peter
From: George Kerby on 2 Aug 2010 12:53 On 8/2/10 10:02 AM, in article Se2dnSZINO6GQ8vRnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d(a)giganews.com, "Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote: > otter wrote: >> On Aug 2, 5:06 am, "Peter"<peter...(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >>> "Paul Furman"<pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote in message >>> news:edidnQVbV_OHw8vRnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>> >>> >>>> I combined those two for your recipe... >>> >>> Paul, I don't understand why you take it seriously. >>> >> Better to not feed it. > > Yeah, I know - hard to resist though once in a while. > Thoroughly enjoyable!
From: Superzooms Still Win on 2 Aug 2010 19:14 On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:07:51 -0700 (PDT), otter <bighorn_bill(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On Aug 2, 5:06�am, "Peter" <peter...(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >> "Paul Furman" <pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote in message >> >> news:edidnQVbV_OHw8vRnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >> >> >> >> > 1.2x green shown. It looks awful. >> >> >> and -30% blue is just about right. >> >> > .83x blue show, as I suggested, if anything. >> >> > I combined those two for your recipe... >> >> Paul, I don't understand why you take it seriously. >> >> Obviously, it's the same deer I refer to when my wife insists on something. >> The green deer is a "yes deer." �It can be whatever color the troll wants it >> to be. >> >> -- >> Peter > >It's not here to reason with you, or even argue or debate. Facts mean >nothing to it. > >It is only here to draw attention to itself, and tick people off. >Better to not feed it. Considering I have proved the Furman Troll wrong at every turn, you're right, it's just here desperately seeking attention. I'll not bother trying to correct its errors so much. It posts bullshit hoping someone will come along to slap its silly face. Far too tedious just for all that attention it wants.
From: Tim Conway on 2 Aug 2010 19:54
"Superzooms Still Win" <ssw(a)noaddress.org> wrote in message news:27ke561ljei8e16b8jnf7u519pkihqe9pq(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:07:51 -0700 (PDT), otter <bighorn_bill(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: > >>On Aug 2, 5:06 am, "Peter" <peter...(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: >>> "Paul Furman" <pa...@-edgehill.net> wrote in message >>> >>> news:edidnQVbV_OHw8vRnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>> >>> >>> >>> > 1.2x green shown. It looks awful. >>> >>> >> and -30% blue is just about right. >>> >>> > .83x blue show, as I suggested, if anything. >>> >>> > I combined those two for your recipe... >>> >>> Paul, I don't understand why you take it seriously. >>> >>> Obviously, it's the same deer I refer to when my wife insists on >>> something. >>> The green deer is a "yes deer." It can be whatever color the troll wants >>> it >>> to be. >>> >>> -- >>> Peter >> >>It's not here to reason with you, or even argue or debate. Facts mean >>nothing to it. >> >>It is only here to draw attention to itself, and tick people off. >>Better to not feed it. > > Considering I have proved the Furman Troll wrong at every turn, you're > right, it's just here desperately seeking attention. I'll not bother > trying > to correct its errors so much. It posts bullshit hoping someone will come > along to slap its silly face. Far too tedious just for all that attention > it wants. > Speak for yourself. |