Things are getting a bit spotty with the 500/4 Nikkor!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: George Kerby on 1 Aug 2010 10:39 On 7/31/10 9:21 PM, in article o8GdnRoVeqeTR8nRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)supernews.com, "Larry Thong" <larry_thong(a)shitstring.com> wrote: > Well, maybe just a little spotty. > > <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Spots.jpg> > Dang, Rita, that's very nice. Are you sure you did that? LOL!
From: George Kerby on 1 Aug 2010 10:41 On 7/31/10 11:50 PM, in article dou956h5f9r0ro571nd3dc1n8fv5f92i6t(a)4ax.com, "Superzooms Still Win" <ssw(a)noaddress.org> wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:30:23 -0400, "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> > wrote: > >> >> "Larry Thong" <larry_thong(a)shitstring.com> wrote in message >> news:o8GdnRoVeqeTR8nRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)supernews.com... >>> Well, maybe just a little spotty. >>> >>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Spots.jpg> >>> >> Nice shot. Just needs a catchlight in the eyes. ;-) > > Blue foliage, red fur, someone sorely needs a camera, monitor, or eyes > adjusted. Did anyone mention the worthless underexposed composition yet? > Interesting that the leaves in front are more in focus than the deer. Looks > like its just as much of a problem with camera and lenses as it is the > snapshooter. > > <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4109/4847902759_058421b547_b.jpg> > ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz........(snore).......zzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZz z...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.....zzzzzzzzz.......(p-p-p-ph-h-h-a-a-a-r-r-rt-t-t)....... ....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ....(yawn)...zzzzzzzzzzz....
From: George Kerby on 1 Aug 2010 10:42 On 8/1/10 12:05 AM, in article i32vbk$n2k$1(a)news.eternal-september.org, "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > "Superzooms Still Win" <ssw(a)noaddress.org> wrote in message > news:dou956h5f9r0ro571nd3dc1n8fv5f92i6t(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:30:23 -0400, "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> "Larry Thong" <larry_thong(a)shitstring.com> wrote in message >>> news:o8GdnRoVeqeTR8nRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)supernews.com... >>>> Well, maybe just a little spotty. >>>> >>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Spots.jpg> >>>> >>> Nice shot. Just needs a catchlight in the eyes. ;-) >> >> Blue foliage, red fur, someone sorely needs a camera, monitor, or eyes >> adjusted. Did anyone mention the worthless underexposed composition yet? >> Interesting that the leaves in front are more in focus than the deer. >> Looks >> like its just as much of a problem with camera and lenses as it is the >> snapshooter. >> >> <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4109/4847902759_058421b547_b.jpg> > > No. Rita's is better by far. And the leaves aren't blue. > Our troll has many problems - including a monitor phase issue.
From: George Kerby on 1 Aug 2010 10:47 On 8/1/10 6:06 AM, in article j4ednQmCLaDPyMjRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)westnet.com.au, "N" <N(a)onyx.com> wrote: > > "Superzooms Still Win" <ssw(a)noaddress.org> wrote in message > news:d1ja565op1i2t28d9dntlaa1iokrj4k2l7(a)4ax.com... >> >> No, but other varieties, which generally are grayish-green. What does an >> Australian Eucalypt tree have to do with the severely bad color shifts in >> this image? There's not one Eucalypt leaf anywhere in that photo. It looks >> like the numbnutz forgot to take it off of cloudy white-balance or >> something. Or even worse, left it on auto white-balance which would easily >> account for the odd colors in this image. The auto white-balance trying to >> overcompensate for the green light source from the canopy so it removed >> green from the leaves turning them blue and removed green from the brown >> of >> the fur giving it that nasty red magenta cast. If you've not done a lot of >> photography under a dense foliage canopy you probably don't have one clue >> about any of these things. There are many many many situations in nature >> photography where you CANNOT use auto white-balance. >> >> But then how would any of you crappy snapshooters know about this when all >> of you use your cameras in full auto point and shoot mode at all times. If >> the camera won't do it for you then you think it's supposed to be that way >> or you just didn't buy a camera that was expensive enough. Idiots, one and >> all. >> >> >> > > Gawd, have you never processed a RAW file? Tonto don't know about "RAW", kemosahbee.
From: Superzooms Still Win on 1 Aug 2010 11:16
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:42:51 -0500, George Kerby <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >On 8/1/10 12:05 AM, in article i32vbk$n2k$1(a)news.eternal-september.org, "Tim >Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >> >> "Superzooms Still Win" <ssw(a)noaddress.org> wrote in message >> news:dou956h5f9r0ro571nd3dc1n8fv5f92i6t(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:30:23 -0400, "Tim Conway" <tconway_113(a)comcast.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> "Larry Thong" <larry_thong(a)shitstring.com> wrote in message >>>> news:o8GdnRoVeqeTR8nRnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)supernews.com... >>>>> Well, maybe just a little spotty. >>>>> >>>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Spots.jpg> >>>>> >>>> Nice shot. Just needs a catchlight in the eyes. ;-) >>> >>> Blue foliage, red fur, someone sorely needs a camera, monitor, or eyes >>> adjusted. Did anyone mention the worthless underexposed composition yet? >>> Interesting that the leaves in front are more in focus than the deer. >>> Looks >>> like its just as much of a problem with camera and lenses as it is the >>> snapshooter. >>> >>> <http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4109/4847902759_058421b547_b.jpg> >> >> No. Rita's is better by far. And the leaves aren't blue. >> >Our troll has many problems - including a monitor phase issue. Resident-Troll-Kerby has a brain phase issue. Ask yourself these questions: "Now why on earth would someone's monitor-display phase problem show up in a JPG file unless he was photographing his monitor? Or is it that Troll-Kerby is just so fuckingly stupid and dumb that Troll-Kerby doesn't realize what a lot of fine vertical lines will look like under high jpg-compression?" See if you can answer both of those questions when asked of yourself. |