Prev: Shhhhhhe-boom shee-boom
Next: The truth about Time
From: spudnik on 1 May 2010 22:03
well, you made an assumption about the general tetrahedron,
early in your proof, that only applies
to a small class of them.

thus:
now that you've read some of it; so?

> Nice site, lyndon larouche & 21stcenturysciencetech.googolplexth.com.

thus:
he seems to be unaware of the neccesity in a"proof,"
of "neccesity AND sufficiency," as first stated
by Leibniz (although having one or the other is,
still, very good -- if actually so .-)
> state of the aether, as determined by our inability to detect it.

thus:
so, you applied Coriolis' Force to General Relativity, and
**** happened? > read more ยป

thus:
with only the "trivial" solutions on the curves o'Fermatttt,
it sounds like a "necessary but insufficient" proof;
PdF certainly could have done it.

> I have been interested in the odd and even aspect of FLT , and
> when Cn = 1. May I have your reference? DRMARJOHN

thus:
so, your coinage of pi(a,b) is the same as pi(b) - pi(a); now,
can you say thr proof as a wordprolemmum?

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.takeTHEgoogolOUT.com
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Shhhhhhe-boom shee-boom
Next: The truth about Time