Two clocks; one moving past the other at high speed
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
Next: The Quantum Geometry of the Spacetime
From: BURT on 5 Nov 2009 12:27 On Nov 5, 9:20 am, rotchm <rot...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Eiisntein said that by his SR theory no aether was necesary for > > calculation. > > Exactly. > > >This people believed was the disproof of its existence. > > People believe what they want. The "ether" was never proven to > unexist. Einstein was a good scientist because he did not reject the aether. It is most important in physics. Mitch Raemsch
From: rotchm on 5 Nov 2009 13:32 > Einstein was a good scientist because he did not reject the aether. It > is most important in physics. > > Mitch Raemsch I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful". It has its advantages.
From: BURT on 5 Nov 2009 14:08 On Nov 5, 10:32 am, rotchm <rot...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Einstein was a good scientist because he did not reject the aether. It > > is most important in physics. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful". > It has its advantages. No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important. Mitch Raemsch
From: rotchm on 5 Nov 2009 14:21 > > I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful". > > It has its advantages. > > No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important. > > Mitch Raemsch No, it cannot be the "most" important: How do you define or quantify "most important" ?
From: BURT on 5 Nov 2009 14:36
On Nov 5, 11:21 am, rotchm <rot...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I agree, but I would replace the "most important" to "quite useful". > > > It has its advantages. > > > No. There can be no doubt rot. It is the most important. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > No, it cannot be the "most" important: How do you define or quantify > "most important" ? Through my intuition. And it is never wrong. Mitch Raemsch |