From: George's Pro Sound Co. on 16 Jun 2010 15:54 "George's Pro Sound Co." <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:pb-dndWP6pl6u4TRnZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com... > > "Phildo" <Phil(a)phildo.net> wrote in message > news:hvb681$k20$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "George's Pro Sound Co." <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:_amdnfu8gakgkYXRnZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com... >>> BTW what do you OWN? >> >> Spending money on something doesn't make your opinion any more valid, it >> just shows that you believe in it. >> >> I don't own that much gear (even less since half of it was stolen last >> night) but my opinion is just as valid as someone who owns $millions. >> >> Phildo BTW I never said that your or anyone elses OPINIONS are not valid for them, I also did not state that I was "right" simply IN MY OPINION line arrays are a faulty design that go against the natural propagation of sound as we experiance it day in and day out and I find the sound of line arrays less natural than the sound or properly deployed point source systems George
From: Joe Kotroczo on 8 Jul 2010 07:38 On 16/06/2010 13:11, in article XIidnb-BhKPMLIXRnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com, "George's Pro Sound Co." <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote: (...) > the wall of sound was much closer to a "articulated line array" with a > center vocal only point source > which is the best most natural system imo. > the articulated line array is also the most expensive and labor intensive Pa > to deploy > but it is the smoothest sweetest sound one can strive for. Eh? "Articulated" is a posh word for "curved". Where do you get the idea from that a line array is "the most expensive and labour intensive PA"? I believe that be be demonstrably wrong. -- Joe Kotroczo kotroczo(a)mac.com
From: Joe Kotroczo on 8 Jul 2010 07:40 On 16/06/2010 21:54, in article lpGdnYRQYaSFsYTRnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com, "George's Pro Sound Co." <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote: (...) > and I find the sound of line arrays less natural than the sound or properly > deployed point source systems George, in your other post you are saying that line arrays have the "smoothest sweetest sound one can strive for." Make up your mind. -- Joe Kotroczo kotroczo(a)mac.com
From: George's Pro Sound Co. on 8 Jul 2010 07:56 "Joe Kotroczo" <kotroczo(a)mac.com> wrote in message news:C85B85DD.C435D%kotroczo(a)mac.com... > On 16/06/2010 21:54, in article > lpGdnYRQYaSFsYTRnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com, "George's Pro Sound Co." > <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > (...) >> and I find the sound of line arrays less natural than the sound or >> properly >> deployed point source systems > > George, in your other post you are saying that line arrays have the > "smoothest sweetest sound one can strive for." > > Make up your mind. > joe please look at the diffrence between the arrangment of the drivers in the kf900 series Vs the typical line array product the 900 stuff works, the others don't George
From: Joe Kotroczo on 8 Jul 2010 08:38
On 08/07/2010 13:56, in article FbmdnaSB4OxhIajRnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d(a)earthlink.com, "George's Pro Sound Co." <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > "Joe Kotroczo" <kotroczo(a)mac.com> wrote in message > news:C85B85DD.C435D%kotroczo(a)mac.com... >> On 16/06/2010 21:54, in article >> lpGdnYRQYaSFsYTRnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com, "George's Pro Sound Co." >> <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> (...) >>> and I find the sound of line arrays less natural than the sound or >>> properly >>> deployed point source systems >> >> George, in your other post you are saying that line arrays have the >> "smoothest sweetest sound one can strive for." >> >> Make up your mind. >> > joe please look at the diffrence between the arrangment of the drivers in > the kf900 series Vs the typical line array product > the 900 stuff works, the others don't The KF900 is NOT a line array. The KF900 is NOT an "articulated line array". -- Joe Kotroczo kotroczo(a)mac.com |