Prev: any injective recursive function inverts the order of infinitelymany numbers
Next: A simplification of Einstein's 1905 paper
From: What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus NP. on 29 Mar 2010 21:28
On Mar 29, 6:08 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 5:35 pm, "What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus
>
> NP." <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Our units of temporal measurement, from seconds on up to months, are
> > so complicated, assymetrical and disjunctive so as to make coherent
> > mental reckoning in time all but impossible. Indeed, had some
> > tyrannical God contrived to enslave our minds to time, to
> > make it all but impossible for us to escape subjection to sodden
> > routines and unpleasant surprises, he could hardly have done
> > better than handing down our present system. It is like a set of
> > surfaces, like a language in which the simplest thought demands
> > ornate constructions, useless particles and lengthy circumlocutions.
> > Unlike the more successful patterns of language
> > and science, which enable us to face experience boldly or at least
> > level-headedly, our system of temporal calculation silently and
> > persistently encourages our terror of time.
>
> What wonderful words! It is so much more liberating
> than narrow confining expressions like:
>
>      "invariance with respect to time translation gives
>       the well-known law of conservation of energy"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications
>
> Could I get you to write a few more lines of prose
> and mail it to me along with your petrol charge card.
>
> Then I would feel wholly and completely liberated from
> the shackles of time and you will forever be my
> spiritual guiding light.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Sue...

Dear Sue:

How wonderful to read your words!

There is a light to this world beside me.

Her beauty is revealed with an honesty, unflinching, and it too long
unseen.

A generation of renerable energy amidst a sea of stars. In time,
hoping to shed more light on things.

(Matters of time, truth, and computation, etc.) Best, Martin
From: Sue... on 29 Mar 2010 21:45
On Mar 29, 9:28 pm, "What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus
NP." <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 6:08 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 5:35 pm, "What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus
>
> > NP." <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Our units of temporal measurement, from seconds on up to months, are
> > > so complicated, assymetrical and disjunctive so as to make coherent
> > > mental reckoning in time all but impossible. Indeed, had some
> > > tyrannical God contrived to enslave our minds to time, to
> > > make it all but impossible for us to escape subjection to sodden
> > > routines and unpleasant surprises, he could hardly have done
> > > better than handing down our present system. It is like a set of
> > > surfaces, like a language in which the simplest thought demands
> > > ornate constructions, useless particles and lengthy circumlocutions.
> > > Unlike the more successful patterns of language
> > > and science, which enable us to face experience boldly or at least
> > > level-headedly, our system of temporal calculation silently and
> > > persistently encourages our terror of time.
>
> > What wonderful words! It is so much more liberating
> > than narrow confining expressions like:
>
> >      "invariance with respect to time translation gives
> >       the well-known law of conservation of energy"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications
>
> > Could I get you to write a few more lines of prose
> > and mail it to me along with your petrol charge card.
>
> > Then I would feel wholly and completely liberated from
> > the shackles of time and you will forever be my
> > spiritual guiding light.
>
> > Thanks in advance,
>
> > Sue...
>
> Dear Sue:
>
> How wonderful to read your words!

Thank you kindly.

>
> There is a light to this world beside me.

Marvellous! If it looks like this, we are on the same
wavelength.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/06_01/bplogoDM_228x300.jpg

>
> Her beauty is revealed with an honesty, unflinching, and it too long
> unseen.

Too long unseen indeed! My employer stopped using them.

>
> A generation of renerable energy amidst a sea of stars. In time,
> hoping to shed more light on things.

If the sea of stars looks like this:

http://tatimolini.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/texaco-logo.jpg

....you can toss those in too. Freedom from the shackles
of time is something you simply can't get too much of.

>
> (Matters of time, truth, and computation, etc.) Best, Martin

Best to you too, :-))

Sue...

From: What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus NP. on 29 Mar 2010 21:47
On Mar 29, 6:08 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 5:35 pm, "What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus
>
> NP." <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Our units of temporal measurement, from seconds on up to months, are
> > so complicated, assymetrical and disjunctive so as to make coherent
> > mental reckoning in time all but impossible. Indeed, had some
> > tyrannical God contrived to enslave our minds to time, to
> > make it all but impossible for us to escape subjection to sodden
> > routines and unpleasant surprises, he could hardly have done
> > better than handing down our present system. It is like a set of
> > surfaces, like a language in which the simplest thought demands
> > ornate constructions, useless particles and lengthy circumlocutions.
> > Unlike the more successful patterns of language
> > and science, which enable us to face experience boldly or at least
> > level-headedly, our system of temporal calculation silently and
> > persistently encourages our terror of time.
>
> What wonderful words! It is so much more liberating
> than narrow confining expressions like:
>
>      "invariance with respect to time translation gives
>       the well-known law of conservation of energy"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications
>
> Could I get you to write a few more lines of prose
> and mail it to me along with your petrol charge card.
>
Sue,

You are so kind, it seems. Yes, if you meant what you said re: me
writing you some more lines of prose and mailing it to you, just send
me the address, I have the stamp! No, re: the petrol card (though I
need) I certainly do not expect it! (your words smile this day!)

Martin
> Then I would feel wholly and completely liberated from
> the shackles of time and you will forever be my
> spiritual guiding light.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Sue...

From: What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus NP. on 29 Mar 2010 21:56
On Mar 29, 6:45 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 9:28 pm, "What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus
>
>
>
>
>
> NP." <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 6:08 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 29, 5:35 pm, "What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus
>
> > > NP." <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Our units of temporal measurement, from seconds on up to months, are
> > > > so complicated, assymetrical and disjunctive so as to make coherent
> > > > mental reckoning in time all but impossible. Indeed, had some
> > > > tyrannical God contrived to enslave our minds to time, to
> > > > make it all but impossible for us to escape subjection to sodden
> > > > routines and unpleasant surprises, he could hardly have done
> > > > better than handing down our present system. It is like a set of
> > > > surfaces, like a language in which the simplest thought demands
> > > > ornate constructions, useless particles and lengthy circumlocutions..
> > > > Unlike the more successful patterns of language
> > > > and science, which enable us to face experience boldly or at least
> > > > level-headedly, our system of temporal calculation silently and
> > > > persistently encourages our terror of time.
>
> > > What wonderful words! It is so much more liberating
> > > than narrow confining expressions like:
>
> > >      "invariance with respect to time translation gives
> > >       the well-known law of conservation of energy"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications
>
> > > Could I get you to write a few more lines of prose
> > > and mail it to me along with your petrol charge card.
>
> > > Then I would feel wholly and completely liberated from
> > > the shackles of time and you will forever be my
> > > spiritual guiding light.
>
> > > Thanks in advance,
>
> > > Sue...
>
> > Dear Sue:
>
> > How wonderful to read your words!
>
> Thank you kindly.
>
>
>
> > There is a light to this world beside me.
>
> Marvellous! If it looks like this, we are on the same
> wavelength.
>
> http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/06_01/bplogoDM_228x300.jpg

It certainly seems, to me, BP!
>
>
>
> > Her beauty is revealed with an honesty, unflinching, and it too long
> > unseen.
>
> Too long unseen indeed! My employer stopped using them.
>
It is tough when the sacrifices we make seem to gave absence to gifts
we once gave, or responsibility sometimes it seems!
>
>
> > A generation of renerable energy amidst a sea of stars. In time,
> > hoping to shed more light on things.
>
> If the sea of stars looks like this:
>
So witty, indeed, I smiled at the man wearing the star before I read
the word!

> http://tatimolini.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/texaco-logo.jpg
>
> ...you can toss those in too. Freedom from the shackles
> of time is something you simply can't get too much of.
>
With you on this one for the long haul.... 10-4, good buddy.
>
>
> > (Matters of time, truth, and computation, etc.) Best, Martin
>
> Best to you too,  :-))
>
y tU
((-:

!!
> Sue...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: Sue... on 29 Mar 2010 22:04
On Mar 29, 9:47 pm, "What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus
NP." <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 6:08 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 29, 5:35 pm, "What you are reading is Philosophy and P Versus
>
> > NP." <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Our units of temporal measurement, from seconds on up to months, are
> > > so complicated, assymetrical and disjunctive so as to make coherent
> > > mental reckoning in time all but impossible. Indeed, had some
> > > tyrannical God contrived to enslave our minds to time, to
> > > make it all but impossible for us to escape subjection to sodden
> > > routines and unpleasant surprises, he could hardly have done
> > > better than handing down our present system. It is like a set of
> > > surfaces, like a language in which the simplest thought demands
> > > ornate constructions, useless particles and lengthy circumlocutions.
> > > Unlike the more successful patterns of language
> > > and science, which enable us to face experience boldly or at least
> > > level-headedly, our system of temporal calculation silently and
> > > persistently encourages our terror of time.
>
> > What wonderful words! It is so much more liberating
> > than narrow confining expressions like:
>
> >      "invariance with respect to time translation gives
> >       the well-known law of conservation of energy"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications
>
> > Could I get you to write a few more lines of prose
> > and mail it to me along with your petrol charge card.
>
> Sue,
>
> You are so kind, it seems. Yes, if you meant what you said re: me
> writing you some more lines of prose and mailing it to you, just send
> me the address, I have the stamp! No, re: the petrol card (though I
> need) I certainly do not expect it! (your words smile this day!)

You are good sport as we make our point that time is
more tangible than some conclude from casual musing.

Awe :-( Ya can't part with your petrol card?

How about a compromise? I will
give your writing some free TIME on my printer and
you can use your stamp to send a cheque to
this address:

http://www.redcross.org/

Kind regards

Sue...

>
> Martin
>
> > Then I would feel wholly and completely liberated from
> > the shackles of time and you will forever be my
> > spiritual guiding light.
>
> > Thanks in advance,
>
> > Sue...
>
>

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: any injective recursive function inverts the order of infinitelymany numbers
Next: A simplification of Einstein's 1905 paper