Prev: 093a:2622 webcam
Next: recent mobo recommendation
From: Camaleón on 14 Apr 2010 11:50 On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:26:45 -0400, Ken Heard wrote: > Camaleón wrote: (...) >> What is the output of "update-alternatives --display firefox- >> javaplugin.so" command? > > At the moment it returns: "No alternatives for firefox-." Sorry, I posted a "broken line" command with no further advice. Full command should be (all in one line): *** update-alternatives --display firefox-javaplugin.so *** Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.04.14.15.34.57(a)gmail.com
From: Camaleón on 14 Apr 2010 12:10 On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:48:56 -0400, Ken Heard wrote: > In directory /usr/lib/firefox/plugins there was already a symbolic link > from libjavaplugin.so to /etc/alternatives/firefox-libjavaplugin.so. > > I renamed that one and made libjavaplugin.so link to > /usr/lib/jvm/jre1.6.0_19/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so. > > Now the command "update-alternatives --display firefox-javaplugin.so" > returns: > > firefox-javaplugin.so - status is auto. > link currently points to > /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/gcjwebplugin.so > /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/gcjwebplugin.so - priority 1061 > Current `best' version is > /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/gcjwebplugin.so. "update-alternatives" output shows that the wrong java plugin version is being picked (openJDK instead Sun's Java one). Mmmm, try first to setup with "update-alternatives", but in this form (one line): *** update-alternatives --config firefox-javaplugin.so *** Look if the above command let you choose between the two options and choose the Sun's one. If that does not work, you can try with the steps provided in Oracle/Sun site (manual way). Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.04.14.16.04.59(a)gmail.com
From: Ken Heard on 14 Apr 2010 12:50 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Camaleón wrote: > "update-alternatives" output shows that the wrong java plugin version is > being picked (openJDK instead Sun's Java one). update-alternatives --config firefox-javaplugin.so now returns: There is only 1 program which provides firefox-javaplugin.so (/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/gcjwebplugin.so). Nothing to configure. This has been my problem all along -- how to get update-alternatives to recognize *any* alternative except the ones provided by debian packages, the one mentioned above, the sun-java6 6-12-1 set of packages and java-gcj. > If that does not work, you can try with the steps provided in Oracle/Sun > site (manual way). Likely the next step, unless I can use the java version in lenny-backports non-free. Ken Heard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvF7+MACgkQlNlJzOkJmTfYiwCeK41iw5IUefBHBVfGVWX5/QIn aTsAn040V9uA+a0cVxa6bg0f36Hw9D4+ =BpLR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4BC5EFE4.4050304(a)heard.name
From: Camaleón on 14 Apr 2010 13:10 On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:40:04 -0400, Ken Heard wrote: > Camaleón wrote: > >> "update-alternatives" output shows that the wrong java plugin version >> is being picked (openJDK instead Sun's Java one). > > update-alternatives --config firefox-javaplugin.so now returns: > > There is only 1 program which provides firefox-javaplugin.so > (/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/gcjwebplugin.so). Nothing to > configure. > > This has been my problem all along -- how to get update-alternatives to > recognize *any* alternative except the ones provided by debian packages, > the one mentioned above, the sun-java6 6-12-1 set of packages and > java-gcj. I used the "update-alternatives" method when I installed the JRE package from Debian contrib repo. That worked fine. As long as the java installation is performed from "the ouside" (by using Oracle-Sun own packages) maybe this method stops working :-? >> If that does not work, you can try with the steps provided in >> Oracle/Sun site (manual way). > > Likely the next step, unless I can use the java version in > lenny-backports non-free. Tell us how it went :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.04.14.17.04.57(a)gmail.com
From: Liam O'Toole on 14 Apr 2010 14:00
On 2010-04-14, Sjoerd Hardeman <sjoerd(a)lorentz.leidenuniv.nl> wrote: ---SNIP--- > Liam O'Toole schreef: ---SNIP--- >> I don't see a lenny-backports version: >>=20 >> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=3Dsun-java6-plugin >>=20 >> Is it available but under a different name? >>=20 > It's there (in non-free): > http://www.backports.org/debian/pool/non-free/s/sun-java6/ Those packages are for etch, and are even older than those in lenny. -- Liam O'Toole Birmingham, United Kingdom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnhsc0cs.bu7.liam.p.otoole(a)dipsy.selfip.org |