VMPlayer 3.0
in [Freeware]
|
From: Daniel Menzel on 29 Oct 2009 07:19 Poutnik schrieb: > In article <4ae4e08a-1f9f-4c8c-975c-3e464a5b2c22 > @s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, ytlim1(a)gmail.com says... >> Has anyone succeeded in downloading VMPlayer 3.0? >> After logging in to the VMWare site and registered for >> the download, the confirmation/activation email hasn't >> come after more than 10 hours. >> >> /Why Tea > > In past, creation of new VM was able to VM workstation, not in player. > Later, I have seen some article is is able to player too, > but not sure, if it was or was not a hack against VMware licence > policy. > I have also read recently, that in VMplayer 3 such a creation of VM is > available, similar to VirtualPC or VirtualBox. > > Is it correct information ? > To create a virtual pc you need, as far as I know, vmware server. After registration you can download for free at the VMWare webpage. I�m running a Windows Vista and the latest OpenSuse Linux on virtual machines for testing. Greets Daniel
From: Why Tea on 29 Oct 2009 08:00 On Oct 29, 5:24 pm, Poutnik <m...(a)privacy.net> wrote: > In article <4ae4e08a-1f9f-4c8c-975c-3e464a5b2c22 > @s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, ytl...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > Has anyone succeeded in downloading VMPlayer 3.0? > > After logging in to the VMWare site and registered for > > the download, the confirmation/activation email hasn't > > come after more than 10 hours. > > > /Why Tea > > In past, creation of new VM was able to VM workstation, not in player. > Later, I have seen some article is is able to player too, > but not sure, if it was or was not a hack against VMware licence > policy. > I have also read recently, that in VMplayer 3 such a creation of VM is > available, similar to VirtualPC or VirtualBox. > > Is it correct information ? > > -- > Poutnik > The best depends on how the best is defined. I only need to run guest OS'es on a desktop host. I think VM Player is faster than the server too. Now that the Player can also create virtual machines, I can't see any compelling reason to use the server. I don't really know the in's and out's of the two. Perhaps you can convince me otherwise :) /Why Tea
From: Man-wai Chang to The Door (+MS=32B) on 29 Oct 2009 08:20 Why Tea wrote: > Has anyone succeeded in downloading VMPlayer 3.0? > After logging in to the VMWare site and registered for > the download, the confirmation/activation email hasn't > come after more than 10 hours. Faster? Better? -- @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (Ubuntu 9.04) Linux 2.6.30.9 ^ ^ 20:19:02 up 22 days 4:41 2 users load average: 1.35 1.26 1.22 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
From: H-Man on 29 Oct 2009 14:14 On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:53:49 -0700, Ron wrote: > Johnw wrote: >> Why Tea explained : >>> Has anyone succeeded in downloading VMPlayer 3.0? >>> After logging in to the VMWare site and registered for >>> the download, the confirmation/activation email hasn't >>> come after more than 10 hours. >>> >>> /Why Tea >> >> Try here. >> >> http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/OS-Enhancements/VMware-Player.shtml >> Or, >> http://www.freewarefiles.com/VMware-Player_program_16093.html >> >> > > The Freewarefiles/Softpedia download carries a slightly different > version number than the VM site. And yes, it took about four hours to > get their "in five minutes" activation email. > > Freewarefiles/Softpedia: > F5645ADA2A20CEEBAFF2651D833E5E2D VMware-player-3.0.0-197124.exe > > VM site download: > D7ECFD5D400A5B44BFAEE4E8FACC07F5 VMware-player-3.0.0-203739.exe > > Ron Moore Build 197124 was a beta version -- HK
From: H-Man on 29 Oct 2009 14:20 On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:19:39 +0100, Daniel Menzel wrote: > Poutnik schrieb: >> In article <4ae4e08a-1f9f-4c8c-975c-3e464a5b2c22 >> @s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, ytlim1(a)gmail.com says... >>> Has anyone succeeded in downloading VMPlayer 3.0? >>> After logging in to the VMWare site and registered for >>> the download, the confirmation/activation email hasn't >>> come after more than 10 hours. >>> >>> /Why Tea >> >> In past, creation of new VM was able to VM workstation, not in player. >> Later, I have seen some article is is able to player too, >> but not sure, if it was or was not a hack against VMware licence >> policy. >> I have also read recently, that in VMplayer 3 such a creation of VM is >> available, similar to VirtualPC or VirtualBox. >> >> Is it correct information ? >> > To create a virtual pc you need, as far as I know, vmware server. > After registration you can download for free at the VMWare webpage. > I�m running a Windows Vista and the latest OpenSuse Linux on virtual > machines for testing. > > Greets > Daniel VMWare Player 3.0 does have the feature to create your own VMs. It is almost everything VM Workstation was a short while back. Aside from the painful registration process, this is a really good product! It is more stable, in my experience, than Virtual Box that had a bad habit of messing up my keyboard and mouse in the host WinXP Pro. -- HK
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: [Update] MergeTorrent v1.1 Next: {FORGERY} Re: combine multiple WAV files into one ? |