From: Daniel Menzel on 29 Oct 2009 14:26 H-Man schrieb: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:19:39 +0100, Daniel Menzel wrote: > >> Poutnik schrieb: >>> In article <4ae4e08a-1f9f-4c8c-975c-3e464a5b2c22 >>> @s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, ytlim1(a)gmail.com says... >>>> Has anyone succeeded in downloading VMPlayer 3.0? >>>> After logging in to the VMWare site and registered for >>>> the download, the confirmation/activation email hasn't >>>> come after more than 10 hours. >>>> >>>> /Why Tea >>> In past, creation of new VM was able to VM workstation, not in player. >>> Later, I have seen some article is is able to player too, >>> but not sure, if it was or was not a hack against VMware licence >>> policy. >>> I have also read recently, that in VMplayer 3 such a creation of VM is >>> available, similar to VirtualPC or VirtualBox. >>> >>> Is it correct information ? >>> >> To create a virtual pc you need, as far as I know, vmware server. >> After registration you can download for free at the VMWare webpage. >> I�m running a Windows Vista and the latest OpenSuse Linux on virtual >> machines for testing. >> >> Greets >> Daniel > > VMWare Player 3.0 does have the feature to create your own VMs. It is > almost everything VM Workstation was a short while back. > > Aside from the painful registration process, this is a really good product! > It is more stable, in my experience, than Virtual Box that had a bad habit > of messing up my keyboard and mouse in the host WinXP Pro. > Mhm, the reason I switched to VMWare was quite simple: USB Support and Linux runs faster and more stable then in virtual pc. Thank you for your advice with VMWare Player, I�ll sure check this out in about a week. Daniel
From: Poutnik on 29 Oct 2009 15:04 In article <25e45776-0170-413d-8622-7d13e04f9348 @i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, ytlim1(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > In past, creation of new VM was able to VM workstation, not in player. > > Later, I have seen some article is is able to player too, > > but not sure, if it was or was not a hack against VMware licence > > policy. > > I have also read recently, that in VMplayer 3 such a creation of VM is > > available, similar to VirtualPC or VirtualBox. > > > > Is it correct information ? > > > > -- > > Poutnik > > The best depends on how the best is defined. > > I only need to run guest OS'es on a desktop host. I > think VM Player is faster than the server too. Now that > the Player can also create virtual machines, I can't > see any compelling reason to use the server. I don't > really know the in's and out's of the two. Perhaps > you can convince me otherwise :) > > /Why Tea Hehe, I have not written anything about VM Server. :-) There is VMware Player, Server and WorkStation, and plenty of other products, like distributed ESX Server. -- Poutnik The best depends on how the best is defined.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: [Update] MergeTorrent v1.1 Next: {FORGERY} Re: combine multiple WAV files into one ? |