Prev: uav matlab model
Next: power meter project
From: John Larkin on 9 Sep 2009 22:52 On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:25:46 -0700 (PDT), gabydewilde <gdewilde(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 9, 11:34�pm, John Larkin ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >> All it would take is one counter-case. > >No you prefer the horse behind the carriage. You want to argue you >don't have to look at anything because of your assumption. This >applies to all previous non investigations. I'm an engineer. I design electronics. It works. I let my dentist fix my teeth and physicists explain my physics. What do you do? > >Your beloved theorem has been an erroneous assumption from day one. >The millions of proofs you assert actually do not exist. They cant >exist because closed systems do not exists. Exactly. COE is an axiom backed up by observation and measurement. Disprove it and you'll be famous. It's amazing how many problems in electronics and signal processing can be correctly, and often very simply, explained by COE and thermodynamics. Of course I like it. What do you do? John
From: John Larkin on 9 Sep 2009 22:53 On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:24:44 -0700 (PDT), gabydewilde <gdewilde(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 9, 10:05�pm, Rich the Philosophizer ><philosobphi...(a)example.net> wrote: >> >> I first heard of Bearden and his "zero point generator" decades ago. >> >> In fact, the concept is so popular, it's used on Stargate Atlantis. >> >> But if it's possible, howcome he hasn't demonstrated anything? >> > >Perhaps you need to look a bit more before making conclusions? > >Just a thought. I want to ride in a zero-point energy powered black helicopter. John
From: Dave on 10 Sep 2009 10:38 On Sep 2, 2:08 am, gabydewilde <gdewi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Floyd Sweet PINK FLOYD DUUUUUDE! sweet music ... light it up mannnnn... " WE DON'T NEED NO....EDUCATION.........."
From: gabydewilde on 10 Sep 2009 19:06 On Sep 10, 6:59 am, John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > > Can't find a job? > Did you mistake the author for the subject again?
From: John Larkin on 10 Sep 2009 19:31
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:06:45 -0700 (PDT), gabydewilde <gdewilde(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 10, 6:59�am, John Larkin ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >> Can't find a job? >> > >Did you mistake the author for the subject again? No, but if you don't believe in COE or standard measurements or any of that hard "science" stuff, you're probably a math-phobic fuzzy thinker, and the market for such isn't good right now. So, what do you do? John |