From: Rob on
I've just ripped some DVDs to disk using Handbrake. Using an i5 2.66
iMac it encodes at about 90fps; using a C2D 2.4 iMac about 30fps. Same
disk and encoding settings (normal default).

I hadn't expected the performance difference to be that great - does it
look about right?

Rob
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on
On Sun, 16 May 2010 13:15:49 +0100, Rob <patchoulianREMOVE(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>I've just ripped some DVDs to disk using Handbrake. Using an i5 2.66
>iMac it encodes at about 90fps; using a C2D 2.4 iMac about 30fps. Same
>disk and encoding settings (normal default).
>
>I hadn't expected the performance difference to be that great - does it
>look about right?

Yup. As well as the quad core advantage, the Core iX generation are a
decent jump ahead of the Core2 chips.

I'd have expected a little higher, to be honest.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"I did not attend his funeral, but I wrote a nice letter saying
I approved of it." - Mark Twain
From: Rob on
On 16/05/2010 13:36, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2010 13:15:49 +0100, Rob<patchoulianREMOVE(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've just ripped some DVDs to disk using Handbrake. Using an i5 2.66
>> iMac it encodes at about 90fps; using a C2D 2.4 iMac about 30fps. Same
>> disk and encoding settings (normal default).
>>
>> I hadn't expected the performance difference to be that great - does it
>> look about right?
>
> Yup. As well as the quad core advantage, the Core iX generation are a
> decent jump ahead of the Core2 chips.
>
> I'd have expected a little higher, to be honest.
>

Thanks - this:

http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2010/04/macbookpro-benchmarks/

suggests < x2 increase, but no grumbles!

Rob
From: SM on
Rob <patchoulianREMOVE(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> I've just ripped some DVDs to disk using Handbrake. Using an i5 2.66
> iMac it encodes at about 90fps; using a C2D 2.4 iMac about 30fps. Same
> disk and encoding settings (normal default).
>
> I hadn't expected the performance difference to be that great - does it
> look about right?

Quick question - does your iMac 27" scratch discs?

Of three i5s which I bought one scratches DVD/CDs badly. This isn't
cackhandedness but something inside isn't right. It's twatted the
install discs for Final Cut Studio and Logic Studio which is a lot of
DVDs :-(

Googling suggests a problem exists but it's clouded by the possibility
of pulling/pushing discs against the aluminium slot.

Stuart
--
cut that out to reply
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:06:21 +0100, info(a)that.sundog.co.uk (SM) wrote:

>Rob <patchoulianREMOVE(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've just ripped some DVDs to disk using Handbrake. Using an i5 2.66
>> iMac it encodes at about 90fps; using a C2D 2.4 iMac about 30fps. Same
>> disk and encoding settings (normal default).
>>
>> I hadn't expected the performance difference to be that great - does it
>> look about right?
>
>Quick question - does your iMac 27" scratch discs?
>
>Of three i5s which I bought one scratches DVD/CDs badly. This isn't
>cackhandedness but something inside isn't right. It's twatted the
>install discs for Final Cut Studio and Logic Studio which is a lot of
>DVDs :-(
>
>Googling suggests a problem exists but it's clouded by the possibility
>of pulling/pushing discs against the aluminium slot.

Mine doesn't, though it's only had about five disks in it since I got
it. Three were 4+gig DVDs being burnt, so had full traversal of the
platter.

It may to be easy to tell the difference between drive internals and
externals (that alu slot) being scratchy - internals will cause curved
tracks following a circle centred on the hole as the disk is spinning,
while externals will be straight lines. The rollers that bring the
disk in count as externals for this, mind...

I remember a lot of Xbox360's had disk scratching problems, of the
curved variety - the read head was ploughing into the spinning disk.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
aibohphobia, n., The fear of palindromes
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Thunderbird and HTML email ?
Next: Parallels slowdown