WE don't need God. All we need is nutty physics that we can call genius
in [Relativity]
|
From: Dakota on 1 Jun 2010 00:40 On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a �crit : >> >>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as >>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his >>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started >>>> without God. >> >>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. >> >> God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > There is no universe without God. > > Mitch Raemsch Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of the world's holy books. What has god done for you lately?
From: Olrik on 1 Jun 2010 00:40 Le 2010-06-01 00:35, BURT a �crit : > On May 31, 9:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a �crit : >> >>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as >>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his >>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started >>> without God. >> >> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. >> >> >> >>> He has gotten away with it. He is the biggest looser >>> and the world put him on the top of science. Shows you that all of them >>> are good for nothing. The world needs an inferior genius to emulate. >> >>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > God can't be defined. So the whole concept is useless. > But as Stephen Hawking said we don't need Him. Why do you care about Stephen Hawking? Did he kill your dog? Stick to ideas, not people. Olrik
From: Olrik on 1 Jun 2010 00:43 Le 2010-06-01 00:28, Don Stockbauer a �crit : > On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a �crit : >> >>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as >>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his >>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started >>> without God. >> >> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > God and the Universe are identical concepts. Not according to religious people. One is "caused" (the universe), the other is not "caused" ("god"). Funny that one is real (the universe), the other imaginary (thousands of "gods" created by us little humans). Olrik
From: Saturday Night Claytonf on 1 Jun 2010 00:46 "BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:8df1cb72-cd9b-456d-abe3-aa289ba7dccb(a)40g2000pry.googlegroups.com... > Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > without God. He has gotten away with it. He is the biggest looser and > the world put him on the top of science. Shows you that all of them > are good for nothing. The world needs an inferior genius to emulate. > > Mitch Raemsch Perfect example of Christian pride in ignorance.
From: BURT on 1 Jun 2010 01:24
On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota <ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote: > On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > >>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > >>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > >>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > >>>> without God. > > >>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > >> God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > > There is no universe without God. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of > the world's holy books. > > What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - He doesn't need to do anything for me. What does he need to do for you? Hawking is a looser. Mitch Raemsch |