WE don't need God. All we need is nutty physics that we can call genius
in [Relativity]
|
From: JayPee Vee on 1 Jun 2010 01:27 On 1 Jun., 08:24, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota <ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > >>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > >>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > >>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > >>>> without God. > > > >>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > >> God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > > > There is no universe without God. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of > > the world's holy books. > > > What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > He doesn't need to do anything for me. > What does he need to do for you? > Hawking is a looser. What's a "looser"?
From: BURT on 1 Jun 2010 01:31 On May 31, 10:27 pm, JayPee Vee <jaypee1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 Jun., 08:24, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota <ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote: > > > > On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > >>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > > >>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > > >>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > > >>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > > >>>> without God. > > > > >>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > > >> God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > > > > There is no universe without God. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of > > > the world's holy books. > > > > What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > He doesn't need to do anything for me. > > What does he need to do for you? > > Hawking is a looser. > > What's a "looser"?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Your a big one. Show me where I am wrong.
From: Syd M. on 1 Jun 2010 01:49 On Jun 1, 12:34 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > > > Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > > > genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > > > imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > > > without God. > > > > Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > There is no universe without God. > > Mitch Raemsch Unsupported assertion. PDW
From: Dakota on 1 Jun 2010 02:09 On Tuesday 6/1/10 12:31 AM, BURT wrote: > On May 31, 10:27 pm, JayPee Vee<jaypee1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 1 Jun., 08:24, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota<ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote: >> >>>> On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>> On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a �crit : >> >>>>>>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as >>>>>>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his >>>>>>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started >>>>>>>> without God. >> >>>>>>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. >> >>>>>> God and the Universe are identical concepts. >> >>>>> There is no universe without God. >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch >> >>>> Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of >>>> the world's holy books. >> >>>> What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>> He doesn't need to do anything for me. >>> What does he need to do for you? >>> Hawking is a looser. >> >> What's a "looser"?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Your a big one. > Show me where I am wrong. > I don't want to take the time to show you everywhere that you are wrong but I will point out that there is a difference between the words 'loose' and 'lose.' Something that is less taut is 'looser.' Someone who doesn't win is a 'loser.' You are a good example of a loser.
From: Yap on 1 Jun 2010 03:20
On 1 Jun, 11:34, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > > > Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > > > genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > > > imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > > > without God. > > > > Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > There is no universe without God. There is no god, but there is a universe. So mighty is your sky pixie that it could not even plug the oil leak, right? > > Mitch Raemsch |