WE don't need God. All we need is nutty physics that we can call genius
in [Relativity]
|
From: Yap on 1 Jun 2010 03:21 On 1 Jun, 11:35, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 31, 9:21 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > > Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > > genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > > imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > > without God. > > > Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > > He has gotten away with it. He is the biggest looser > > > and the world put him on the top of science. Shows you that all of them > > > are good for nothing. The world needs an inferior genius to emulate. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > God can't be defined. But as Stephen Hawking said we don't need Him. Anything in this universe that is physical and present can be defined.
From: Yap on 1 Jun 2010 03:25 On 1 Jun, 12:24, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota <ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote: > > > > > On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > >>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > >>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > >>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > >>>> without God. > > > >>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > >> God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > > > There is no universe without God. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of > > the world's holy books. > > > What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > He doesn't need to do anything for me. > What does he need to do for you? > Hawking is a looser. If you have nothing for him to do, why do you need one? Hawking is well known and respected, but burt is nothing and no body. > > Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 2 Jun 2010 02:07 On May 31, 9:40 pm, Olrik <olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Le 2010-06-01 00:35, BURT a écrit : > > > > > > > On May 31, 9:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > >>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > >>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > >>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > >>> without God. > > >> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > >>> He has gotten away with it. He is the biggest looser > >>> and the world put him on the top of science. Shows you that all of them > >>> are good for nothing. The world needs an inferior genius to emulate. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > God can't be defined. > > So the whole concept is useless. You cannot limit God to a concept. > > But as Stephen Hawking said we don't need Him. > > Why do you care about Stephen Hawking? Did he kill your dog? Stick to > ideas, not people. > > Olrik- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - NO. I am an equal opportunity offender. Stephen Hawking's MO is intimidation. He is an inferior genius and the world has elevated him to the top of science. The world is as inferior as its hero. They made him into God. So who is greater? Isnt the God maker superior to the God he made? That's the way it works with the world and science. Mitch Raemsch
From: Igor on 2 Jun 2010 13:08 On May 31, 11:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >The world needs an inferior genius to emulate. And you're about as inferior as they come. Too bad you're not a genius though. My dog knows more about physics that you do.
From: Igor on 2 Jun 2010 13:12
On Jun 1, 1:27 am, JayPee Vee <jaypee1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 Jun., 08:24, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 31, 9:40 pm, Dakota <ma...(a)NOSPAM.com> wrote: > > > > On Monday 5/31/10 11:34 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > On May 31, 9:28 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On May 31, 11:21 pm, Olrik<olrik...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > >>> Le 2010-05-31 23:55, BURT a écrit : > > > > >>>> Of course Hawking's atheist science uses ideas that will pass as > > > >>>> genius but really are far from it. They are nothing more than his > > > >>>> imagination. And he uses them to define that the universe started > > > >>>> without God. > > > > >>> Define that "god" thing you're talking about. > > > > >> God and the Universe are identical concepts. > > > > > There is no universe without God. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Dr. Hawking's imagination is a more reliable source of truth than all of > > > the world's holy books. > > > > What has god done for you lately?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > He doesn't need to do anything for me. > > What does he need to do for you? > > Hawking is a looser. > > What's a "looser"? Probably someone like poor Mitch who has trouble writing in his own native tongue. |