Prev: CERN, LHC, strangelet = droplet of death. Copy this letter and send it to another forum; to physicists, politicians, prosecutors, terrorists; to citizens of Geneva and so on.
Next: NATURE: A CoGeNT result in the hunt for dark matter [?]
From: spudnik on 17 Mar 2010 16:32
I'm an idiot. what's funny is that
I attended the Ninth Nonlinear Science Conference at UCLA,
where the keynoter told the story of how,
Newton stole the inverse second-power law
(the algebraization of Kepler's orbital constraints).

thus:
that is, he corrected an error in the marginal statemnt,
thus also ruling-out all powers of two, as exponential
(from the lemma that you only need to work the prime powers).

> why would Fermat explicitly state n=4, otherwise?
> (he did not prove n=3, explicitly.)

thus:
ha, good question about every God-am frequency (1/period).
Burt also had a really good question, about (say)
How would Sun emit a photon -- what shape does it go?...
he must be using the new "mental operating system!"

thus:
most of the interpretation of the EPR "paradox" results,
a l'Alain Aspect et al, is due to the ideal of a photon,
in assinging all of the God-am energy of the wave-front
as a "mass" (electron-voltage, say) of a particle, whence
the wave-energy was somehow "caught" by the photo-
eletrical device. here are two ways to get over this: a)
just consider the practice of audio quantization, the phonon; b)
show how the photoelectrical device is actually tuned
to absorb a particular frequency of light.
so, is the "phonon" just one cycle of the period
of the sound, and like-wise, is the photon just
one cycle of the frequency?

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.com

--Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus!
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/

--Stop Cheeny, Rice, Waxman, Pendergast and
ICC's 3rd Brutish invasion of Sudan!
http://larouchepub.com
From: Raymond Yohros on 18 Mar 2010 16:52
On Mar 17, 9:41 am, Marvin the Martian <mar...(a)ontomars.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:19:33 -0700, Urion wrote:
> > I think people like Einstein, Newton and maybe even some very strong
> > blind chess players (blind chess is the ability to play chess without
> > seeing the board) have a few things in common: Their incredible memory
> > and spatial processing ability.
>
> The point of the thread is that Einstein didn't do anything remarkable,
> as Newton did.
>

both where remarkable in their own way
they live in deferent times and they had different
personalities. newton did nothing but think
and study. he didnt even mess around with chics
or drink any alcohol!
he was so incredibly devoted to science
that he could stay working non stop for
days without sleep or eat.

einstein on the other hand did a lot of stuff.
any pretty chic made his head spin and he use
to have pleasures and a great sense of humor,
creativity came natural to him. more like trips
in his mind instead of rigorous hard thinking.

newtons knowledge has been the cornerstone of
science and engineering for centuries and today.
the science of einstein its only starting
to show its potential.

r.y



From: Marvin the Martian on 19 Mar 2010 12:43
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:52:57 -0700, Raymond Yohros wrote:

> the science of einstein its only starting to
> show its potential.
>
> r.y

Potential? Not really. Like I said, SR existed before Einstein in the
form of the Lorentz transformation; it was all there from time dilation
to length contraction. Einstein's part was trivial; he gave an example of
how it applies.

The applications of SR/GR are rare. However, engineering is almost pure
Newtonian. Newtonian mechanics have a MAJOR impact.

From: Raymond Yohros on 19 Mar 2010 14:03
On Mar 19, 11:43 am, Marvin the Martian <mar...(a)ontomars.org> wrote:
> Potential? Not really. Like I said, SR existed before Einstein in the
> form of the Lorentz transformation; it was all there from time dilation
> to length contraction. Einstein's part was trivial; he gave an example of
> how it applies.
>

gps and atom clocks are just the begining.
einsteins work its build for the future

>
> However, engineering is almost pure
> Newtonian. Newtonian mechanics have a MAJOR impact.
>

dont forget leonardo davinci
he was the greatest engineer of all times

r.y

From: Marvin the Martian on 19 Mar 2010 19:58
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:03:47 -0700, Raymond Yohros wrote:

> On Mar 19, 11:43 am, Marvin the Martian <mar...(a)ontomars.org> wrote:
>> Potential? Not really. Like I said, SR existed before Einstein in the
>> form of the Lorentz transformation; it was all there from time dilation
>> to length contraction. Einstein's part was trivial; he gave an example
>> of how it applies.
>>
>>
> gps and atom clocks are just the begining. einsteins work its build for
> the future

Atomic clocks have nothing to do with relativity. GPS accounts for the
time difference in a gravity well; something theories other than GR, like
Sciama's, does just as well.


>> However, engineering is almost pure
>> Newtonian. Newtonian mechanics have a MAJOR impact.
>>
>>
> dont forget leonardo davinci
> he was the greatest engineer of all times

Without calculus, da Vinci could only guess. But that is not really
relevant.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Prev: CERN, LHC, strangelet = droplet of death. Copy this letter and send it to another forum; to physicists, politicians, prosecutors, terrorists; to citizens of Geneva and so on.
Next: NATURE: A CoGeNT result in the hunt for dark matter [?]