From: Benj on
On May 1, 9:04 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/1/10 4:30 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
>
> > BIZARRE animal deaths in Powys are being blamed on visitors from outer
> > space, UFO experts have claimed.
>
>    You are easily fooled Hardy... There are no "UFO experts".

You mean there are no UFO experts who are allowed to speak in public.
From: Benj on
On May 1, 9:05 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/1/10 7:22 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
>
> > Ah..there are things that even in your philosophy Uncle Al that are
> > unknown..
>
> > Hardy
>
>    Unknown doesn't make something so!

Doesn't make it not so either.

idiot.
From: Benj on
On May 1, 5:30 pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> “These spheres are clearly not Chinese lanterns and do not conform to
> any known conventional aircraft or meteorological manifestation.”
>
> Phil says the UFOs like to roam a specific 50-mile corridor between
> Shrewsbury and Powys, but Dartmoor and the Forest of Dean in
> Gloucestershire are also hunting grounds. Sheep have been found with
> neat hole and their brains and other internal organs removed.
>
> Anyone with information regarding the animal mutilation mystery or
> sightings of unconventional craft can contact Phil Hoyle by emailing
> phil.hoyle(a)yahoo. co.uk or calling 01743 245574 01743 245574. All
> information will be treated in strict confidence.

So. Are animal mutilations real? Well, that is easy enough to prove.
Mutilations do leave behind evidence you know.
Yes, mutilations ARE real. There is lots of data gathered on them here
and in the Yoo Kay.

Are they performed by "Chinese Lanterns"? Are you an idiot?

Are the mutilations performed by persons on the ground? Evidence is
they are not. Mutilations occur without tracks of any kind around the
animals.

Are people just perpetrating hoaxes or undergoing a "mass
hallucination"? Sorry, mutilations leave REAL evidence behind,
remember?

Is there ANY evidence that mutilations are performed by any beings
"from outer space"? Balls of light. UFOs and what have you only prove
ignorance. The U in UFO stands for "Unidentified".

Is there ANY evidence that somehow humans are involved? Yes. Not only
a militaristic disregard for animal life, but also a very human
interest in animal sexual organs.

Have witnesses viewed any hints of unknown or "high" technology not
commonly observed in our civilization? Yes, they have. Strange
lights. Bloodless incisions. and operations carried out totally from
the air.

Bottom line: Only reasonable scientific conclusion:

Animal mutilations involve, humans, probably military, using
classified technology for unknown purposes.

Note how this scientific conclusion differs from the imaginary ones of
"Wormley" and Uncle Al.

They are idiots.



From: HardySpicer on
On May 3, 2:42 am, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote:
> On May 1, 5:30 pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > “These spheres are clearly not Chinese lanterns and do not conform to
> > any known conventional aircraft or meteorological manifestation.”
>
> > Phil says the UFOs like to roam a specific 50-mile corridor between
> > Shrewsbury and Powys, but Dartmoor and the Forest of Dean in
> > Gloucestershire are also hunting grounds. Sheep have been found with
> > neat hole and their brains and other internal organs removed.
>
> > Anyone with information regarding the animal mutilation mystery or
> > sightings of unconventional craft can contact Phil Hoyle by emailing
> > phil.hoyle(a)yahoo. co.uk or calling 01743 245574 01743 245574. All
> > information will be treated in strict confidence.
>
> So. Are animal mutilations real?  Well, that is easy enough to prove.
> Mutilations do leave behind evidence you know.
> Yes, mutilations ARE real. There is lots of data gathered on them here
> and in the Yoo Kay.
>
> Are they performed by "Chinese Lanterns"?  Are you an idiot?
>
> Are the mutilations performed by persons on the ground?  Evidence is
> they are not. Mutilations occur without tracks of any kind around the
> animals.
>
> Are people just perpetrating hoaxes or undergoing a "mass
> hallucination"?  Sorry, mutilations leave REAL evidence behind,
> remember?
>
> Is there ANY evidence that mutilations are performed by any beings
> "from outer space"?  Balls of light. UFOs and what have you only prove
> ignorance.  The U in UFO stands for "Unidentified".
>
> Is there ANY evidence that somehow humans are involved? Yes. Not only
> a militaristic disregard for animal life, but also a very human
> interest in animal sexual organs.
>
> Have witnesses viewed any hints of unknown or "high" technology not
> commonly observed in our civilization?  Yes, they have. Strange
> lights. Bloodless incisions. and operations carried out totally from
> the air.
>
> Bottom line:  Only reasonable scientific conclusion:
>
> Animal mutilations involve, humans, probably military, using
> classified technology for unknown purposes.
>
> Note how this scientific conclusion differs from the imaginary ones of
> "Wormley" and Uncle Al.
>
> They are idiots.

To that I would agree. Probably military of some sort. But then again,
why would they do it in a field at mightnight when they can breed
their own cattle!!


Hardy
From: HardySpicer on
On May 2, 10:24 pm, Terrys <merryter...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 2, 6:25 pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 7:15 pm, Terrys <merryter...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > HardySpicer wrote:
> > > > On May 2, 1:04 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 5/1/10 4:30 PM, HardySpicer wrote:
>
> > > > > > BIZARRE animal deaths in Powys are being blamed on visitors from outer
> > > > > > space, UFO experts have claimed.
>
> > > > >    You are easily fooled Hardy... There are no "UFO experts".
>
> > > > Really? What exactly is an expert? Somebody who has studied the
> > > > phenomena for maybe 20 years.
> > > > That would be an expert and I expect he would know a lot more than the
> > > > average person.
> > But besides being a complete idiot - what else do you do? You may well
> > have noticed that I have not expressed an opinion at all
>
> I see from the above that you did. I commented on that.

I did what? What did I comment on? I only said that there were more
things on earth than Uncle Al's philosophy.

Idiot!

Hardy