From: Richard Maine on 26 Jun 2010 01:32 Phillip Jones <pjones1(a)kimbanet.com> wrote: > > Mike Rosenberg<mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com> wrote: > > > >> Erik Richard S�rensen<NOSPAM(a)NOSPAM.dk> wrote: > >>> I still guarantee you that the .wps is/was used by Corel WordPerfect as > >>> well as the older version of both Word Perfect and WordPerfect Works on > >>> the Mac! > >> > >> Then finding a reference somewhere shouldn't be too difficult for you. .... > http://www.fileinfo.com/extension/wp > > This should answer. > > wordperfect is this: > http://www.fileinfo.com/extension/wpd No, those don't actually address the question at all. Those say that Wordperfect used wp and wpd, but they don't say that it never used wps, which was the question. Mike was asking for citations for the wps. Finding citations for wpd is trivial; they are all over the place, but not that citation doesn't answer the question of whether some version might have used wps. -- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgment. domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
From: Mike Rosenberg on 26 Jun 2010 10:03
Phillip Jones <pjones1(a)kimbanet.com> wrote: > >>> I still guarantee you that the .wps is/was used by Corel WordPerfect as > >>> well as the older version of both Word Perfect and WordPerfect Works on > >>> the Mac! > >> > >> Then finding a reference somewhere shouldn't be too difficult for you. > > > > So......? Are you pulling another of your disappearing acts when asked > > to provide references to support an assertion you've made? > > > > http://www.fileinfo.com/extension/wp > > This should answer. > > wordperfect is this: > http://www.fileinfo.com/extension/wpd Um, have you not ready any of the thread prior to my previous post? Mr. S�rensen claims that Mac versions of WordPerfect used the .wps extension rather than .wpd and has no citations to back that assertion. He's done such things repeatedly over the years, making claims that go counter to everyone else's experiences and observations, argues that he alone is right, makes long and blustery posts, but never provides a single citation when challenged to. Previously, he claimed that the latest version of Roxio Toast has hidden features known only to him. So well hidden that even Roxio is unaware of them. Prior to that, he claimed Photoshop Elements 2.0 was dependent on Classic to run, when in fact it runs on all Mac OS X versions through 10.4.11. There are more examples... -- Favorite yoga position: Rosh hashavasana, the high holy pose Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi> |