What are space and time? [Logic]

Prev: NP+complete-problem navigation, search In computational complexity theory, the complexity class NP-complete (abbreviated NP-C or NPC), is a class of problems having two properties: * It is in the set of NP (nondeterministic polynomial time) pr
Next: Continuity and Uncountability

From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 05:33

On 18 Juli, 10:47, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 1:47 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > My view of spacetime is more aligned with Einstein than Kant.
>
> You have yet to explain how to identify time from any other concept,
> why is that?
>
> Why have you used spacetime as if it has a meaning of its own?
>
> How does spacetime differ from time and space?
>
> MG

Nonesimulated space is basicly the cubic volume of a part of Euclidian
space. It has volume quantity by the masses that occupy and encloses
it. And this cubic space or volume can be plotted with just three
dimensions. Space do not curve, mass that travel space may not travel
in a straight line due to mass of gravitational forces but there is no
curved space.

Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to
measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off).
On a higher level these causual events is governed by logical
determinism, namely ***positional particle/mass existence**** vs
***void*** in the f three dimensional order/cosmos of Euclidian space.

Field propagation of ***positional particle/mass existence*** is
instant, there is no transmission delay ***instant field collapse and
interaction***.
Fields do not propagate, waves in matter and particles do. At a field
collaps all interacting fields notified instantly.

If you do not provoke minds you really did not say anything.

JT

From: Sam Wormley on 18 Jul 2010 05:48

On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote:
> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to
> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off).

Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper

ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 05:58

On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote:
>
> > Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to
> > measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off).
>
> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper
>
> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant
time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow
of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i
have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME.

JT

From: Sam Wormley on 18 Jul 2010 06:05

On 7/18/10 4:58 AM, JT wrote:
> On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote:
>>
>>> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to
>>> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off).
>>
>> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper
>>
>> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
>> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
>
> Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant
> time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow
> of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i
> have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME.
>
> JT

You do like to ignore both theory and evidence, don't you JT?

Physics FAQ: What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html

From: JT on 18 Jul 2010 06:22

On 18 Juli, 12:05, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/18/10 4:58 AM, JT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote:
>
> >>> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to
> >>> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off).
>
> >> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper
>
> >> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
> >> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
>
> > Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant
> > time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow
> > of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i
> > have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME.
>
> > JT
>
> You do like to ignore both theory and evidence, don't you JT?
>
> Physics FAQ: What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html- Dölj citerad text -
>
> - Visa citerad text -

No Sam time is the ***universal rate*** that a pulsar flickers with
using a ***nonevariant unit***. Units are nonevariant according to
your Dear SR theory clocks around the equatorial band would be slower
then clocks at the fixed poles and it simply do not happen.

JT