What is the disagreement to aether?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: 4-vector dot A = invariant => A is a 4-vector?
Next: Capacitance theory of gravity - interesting theory
From: PD on 1 Mar 2010 16:23 On Mar 1, 3:17 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 3:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > You realize you are the only person on this forum who chooses to > > > believe the future determines the past, correct? > > > Nonsense. You do realize that I'm about the only trained physicist who > > responds to you at all in this forum, correct? > > I do realize you have to choose to believe in the future determines > the past in order to support a failed theory. > > > > > If you want to find out what physicists think, get off this forum and > > start reading books. Then you'll find out. > > > > And you are so full > > > of absurd nonsense you think you should be asked questions about > > > nature. > > > > > > My definition of a photon is more correct than any other. > > > > > You say it is more correct than the one than the present explanation > > > > of how photons work, but you don't know the present explanation of how > > > > photons work. How can what you say be more correct than something you > > > > know nothing about, except by blind assertion? > > > > Because anyone who chooses to believe the future determines the past > > > is unqualified to speak to anything having to do with physics. > > > Aha. So if you don't believe it, it's wrong? > > This is an excellent way to avoid learning anything. > > You would think if you were correct and there were others who > supported your 'theory' which requires the future to determine the > past there would be at least one other person on this forum who would > be willing to state they also choose to believe the future determines > the past. Not really. Considering that you are a loon, most physicists aren't the least bit interested in talking with you at all. When they do, they usually engage with you for one or two posts and then give up in disgust. Personally, I find you perversely amusing, which accounts for my long (and pointless) conversations with you. I don't have any pretense of trying to convince you of something you are determined not to believe. That would be like teaching algebra to a table leg. All I'm pointing out to you is that you've got nothing but assertion behind what you do believe. Even a table leg could figure that out. > > > > > > > It just boils your blood to ask a question, doesn't it? Asking > > > > questions makes you feel stupid, and you've felt stupid your whole > > > > life, so you'll be damned if you're going to ask a question. > > > > Not at all. I am always willing to ask a question when I do not > > > understand something. > > > How about photons and heat? Understand them? You were almost asking > > questions about them earlier. Almost. > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > When a photon is detected what occurs physically in nature is the > aether wave collapses when detected into a quantum of mather. When a > photon interacts with the material which is the human body the quantum > of mather expands in three dimensional space as it transitions to > aether and the physical effects this expansion has on the neighboring > mather generates heat. See? Can't ask a question. The question almost comes out and then it just gets lodged in your throat like a chicken bone. Can't do it. It's a pathological problem. But you know you've got problems, so I don't have to tell you that. > > > > It just so happens I understand a moving C-60 > > > molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > > You know you have an emotional problem, right? > > > > > > The photon > > > > > is a directed/pointed wave in the aether which when detected collapses > > > > > into a quantum of mather. > > > > > > When the quantum of mather is detected in the material which is the > > > > > human body the mather decompresses. The physical effect of this > > > > > decompression on the neighboring mather is heat. > > > > > > > > There was a > > > > > > > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > > > > > > > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > > > > > > > radiates'. > > > > > > > I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. > > > > > > > When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple > > > > > > questions, you'll get answers. > > > > > > > > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > > > > > > > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > > > > > > > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > > > > > > > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does > > > > > > > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > > > > > > > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > > > > > > > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > > > > > > > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > > > > > > > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > > > > > > > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > > > > > > > from human bodies. > > > > > > > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > > > > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > > > > > > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > > > > > > > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > > > > > > > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > > > > > > > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > > > > > > > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > > > > > > > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > > > > > > > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > > > > > > > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion.. > > > > > > > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > > > > > > > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body. > >
From: mpc755 on 1 Mar 2010 16:32 On Mar 1, 4:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 3:17 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 1, 3:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > You realize you are the only person on this forum who chooses to > > > > believe the future determines the past, correct? > > > > Nonsense. You do realize that I'm about the only trained physicist who > > > responds to you at all in this forum, correct? > > > I do realize you have to choose to believe in the future determines > > the past in order to support a failed theory. > > > > If you want to find out what physicists think, get off this forum and > > > start reading books. Then you'll find out. > > > > > And you are so full > > > > of absurd nonsense you think you should be asked questions about > > > > nature. > > > > > > > My definition of a photon is more correct than any other. > > > > > > You say it is more correct than the one than the present explanation > > > > > of how photons work, but you don't know the present explanation of how > > > > > photons work. How can what you say be more correct than something you > > > > > know nothing about, except by blind assertion? > > > > > Because anyone who chooses to believe the future determines the past > > > > is unqualified to speak to anything having to do with physics. > > > > Aha. So if you don't believe it, it's wrong? > > > This is an excellent way to avoid learning anything. > > > You would think if you were correct and there were others who > > supported your 'theory' which requires the future to determine the > > past there would be at least one other person on this forum who would > > be willing to state they also choose to believe the future determines > > the past. > > Not really. That is more of your inability to see how incorrect you really are. There is not one 'physicist' on this forum willing to state they also choose to believe the future determines the past. There is not one non- physicist on this forum willing to state they also choose to believe the future determines the past. No one chooses to believe the future determines the past but you. Do you know why that is? Because the future does not determine the past. A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. When a photon is detected by the material which is the human body it decompresses and the effect this expansion has on the neighboring mather generates heat. > Considering that you are a loon, most physicists aren't > the least bit interested in talking with you at all. When they do, > they usually engage with you for one or two posts and then give up in > disgust. Personally, I find you perversely amusing, which accounts for > my long (and pointless) conversations with you. > > I don't have any pretense of trying to convince you of something you > are determined not to believe. That would be like teaching algebra to > a table leg. All I'm pointing out to you is that you've got nothing > but assertion behind what you do believe. Even a table leg could > figure that out. > > > > > > > > > > It just boils your blood to ask a question, doesn't it? Asking > > > > > questions makes you feel stupid, and you've felt stupid your whole > > > > > life, so you'll be damned if you're going to ask a question. > > > > > Not at all. I am always willing to ask a question when I do not > > > > understand something. > > > > How about photons and heat? Understand them? You were almost asking > > > questions about them earlier. Almost. > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > When a photon is detected what occurs physically in nature is the > > aether wave collapses when detected into a quantum of mather. When a > > photon interacts with the material which is the human body the quantum > > of mather expands in three dimensional space as it transitions to > > aether and the physical effects this expansion has on the neighboring > > mather generates heat. > > See? Can't ask a question. The question almost comes out and then it > just gets lodged in your throat like a chicken bone. Can't do it. It's > a pathological problem. But you know you've got problems, so I don't > have to tell you that. > > > > > > > It just so happens I understand a moving C-60 > > > > molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > > > You know you have an emotional problem, right? > > > > > > > The photon > > > > > > is a directed/pointed wave in the aether which when detected collapses > > > > > > into a quantum of mather. > > > > > > > When the quantum of mather is detected in the material which is the > > > > > > human body the mather decompresses. The physical effect of this > > > > > > decompression on the neighboring mather is heat. > > > > > > > > > There was a > > > > > > > > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > > > > > > > > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > > > > > > > > radiates'. > > > > > > > > I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. > > > > > > > > When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple > > > > > > > questions, you'll get answers. > > > > > > > > > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > > > > > > > > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > > > > > > > > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > > > > > > > > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'.. What does > > > > > > > > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > > > > > > > > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > > > > > > > > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > > > > > > > > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > > > > > > > > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > > > > > > > > from human bodies. > > > > > > > > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > > > > > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > > > > > > > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > > > > > > > > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > > > > > > > > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > > > > > > > > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > > > > > > > > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > > > > > > > > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > > > > > > > > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > > > > > > > > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. > > > > > > > > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > > > > > > > > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body. > >
From: BURT on 1 Mar 2010 16:37 On Mar 1, 1:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 4:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 1, 3:17 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 3:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > You realize you are the only person on this forum who chooses to > > > > > believe the future determines the past, correct? > > > > > Nonsense. You do realize that I'm about the only trained physicist who > > > > responds to you at all in this forum, correct? > > > > I do realize you have to choose to believe in the future determines > > > the past in order to support a failed theory. > > > > > If you want to find out what physicists think, get off this forum and > > > > start reading books. Then you'll find out. > > > > > > And you are so full > > > > > of absurd nonsense you think you should be asked questions about > > > > > nature. > > > > > > > > My definition of a photon is more correct than any other. > > > > > > > You say it is more correct than the one than the present explanation > > > > > > of how photons work, but you don't know the present explanation of how > > > > > > photons work. How can what you say be more correct than something you > > > > > > know nothing about, except by blind assertion? > > > > > > Because anyone who chooses to believe the future determines the past > > > > > is unqualified to speak to anything having to do with physics. > > > > > Aha. So if you don't believe it, it's wrong? > > > > This is an excellent way to avoid learning anything. > > > > You would think if you were correct and there were others who > > > supported your 'theory' which requires the future to determine the > > > past there would be at least one other person on this forum who would > > > be willing to state they also choose to believe the future determines > > > the past. > > > Not really. > > That is more of your inability to see how incorrect you really are. > There is not one 'physicist' on this forum willing to state they also > choose to believe the future determines the past. There is not one non- > physicist on this forum willing to state they also choose to believe > the future determines the past. No one chooses to believe the future > determines the past but you. Do you know why that is? Because the > future does not determine the past. > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > When a photon is detected by the material which is the human body it > decompresses and the effect this expansion has on the neighboring > mather generates heat. > > > > > Considering that you are a loon, most physicists aren't > > the least bit interested in talking with you at all. When they do, > > they usually engage with you for one or two posts and then give up in > > disgust. Personally, I find you perversely amusing, which accounts for > > my long (and pointless) conversations with you. > > > I don't have any pretense of trying to convince you of something you > > are determined not to believe. That would be like teaching algebra to > > a table leg. All I'm pointing out to you is that you've got nothing > > but assertion behind what you do believe. Even a table leg could > > figure that out. > > > > > > > It just boils your blood to ask a question, doesn't it? Asking > > > > > > questions makes you feel stupid, and you've felt stupid your whole > > > > > > life, so you'll be damned if you're going to ask a question. > > > > > > Not at all. I am always willing to ask a question when I do not > > > > > understand something. > > > > > How about photons and heat? Understand them? You were almost asking > > > > questions about them earlier. Almost. > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > When a photon is detected what occurs physically in nature is the > > > aether wave collapses when detected into a quantum of mather. When a > > > photon interacts with the material which is the human body the quantum > > > of mather expands in three dimensional space as it transitions to > > > aether and the physical effects this expansion has on the neighboring > > > mather generates heat. > > > See? Can't ask a question. The question almost comes out and then it > > just gets lodged in your throat like a chicken bone. Can't do it. It's > > a pathological problem. But you know you've got problems, so I don't > > have to tell you that. > > > > > > It just so happens I understand a moving C-60 > > > > > molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > > > > You know you have an emotional problem, right? > > > > > > > > The photon > > > > > > > is a directed/pointed wave in the aether which when detected collapses > > > > > > > into a quantum of mather. > > > > > > > > When the quantum of mather is detected in the material which is the > > > > > > > human body the mather decompresses. The physical effect of this > > > > > > > decompression on the neighboring mather is heat. > > > > > > > > > > There was a > > > > > > > > > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > > > > > > > > > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > > > > > > > > > radiates'. > > > > > > > > > I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. > > > > > > > > > When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple > > > > > > > > questions, you'll get answers. > > > > > > > > > > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > > > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > > > > > > > > > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > > > > > > > > > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > > > > > > > > > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does > > > > > > > > > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > > > > > > > > > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > > > > > > > > > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > > > > > > > > > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > > > > > > > > > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > > > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > > > > > > > > > from human bodies. > > > > > > > > > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > > > > > > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > > > > > > > > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > > > > > > > > > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > > > > > > > > > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > > > > > > > > > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > > > > > > > > > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > > > > > > > > > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > > > > > > > > > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > > > > > > > > > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. > > > > > > > > > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > > > > > > > > > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - A light wave emited by an electron in an atom can go 360 degrees. Half of the time it goes inward in the direction of the nucleus the other half outwards of the atom. Mitch Raemsch
From: PD on 1 Mar 2010 16:44 On Mar 1, 3:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 4:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 1, 3:17 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 3:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > You realize you are the only person on this forum who chooses to > > > > > believe the future determines the past, correct? > > > > > Nonsense. You do realize that I'm about the only trained physicist who > > > > responds to you at all in this forum, correct? > > > > I do realize you have to choose to believe in the future determines > > > the past in order to support a failed theory. > > > > > If you want to find out what physicists think, get off this forum and > > > > start reading books. Then you'll find out. > > > > > > And you are so full > > > > > of absurd nonsense you think you should be asked questions about > > > > > nature. > > > > > > > > My definition of a photon is more correct than any other. > > > > > > > You say it is more correct than the one than the present explanation > > > > > > of how photons work, but you don't know the present explanation of how > > > > > > photons work. How can what you say be more correct than something you > > > > > > know nothing about, except by blind assertion? > > > > > > Because anyone who chooses to believe the future determines the past > > > > > is unqualified to speak to anything having to do with physics. > > > > > Aha. So if you don't believe it, it's wrong? > > > > This is an excellent way to avoid learning anything. > > > > You would think if you were correct and there were others who > > > supported your 'theory' which requires the future to determine the > > > past there would be at least one other person on this forum who would > > > be willing to state they also choose to believe the future determines > > > the past. > > > Not really. > > That is more of your inability to see how incorrect you really are. > There is not one 'physicist' on this forum willing to state they also > choose to believe the future determines the past. Sure there is. They're just not talking to you. Have you figured out how to get physicists to answer that question yes or no? When people don't talk to you, do you know what they're thinking by reading their minds? Or do you just make it up what they think? You make up a lot of things. That's because you're mental. > There is not one non- > physicist on this forum willing to state they also choose to believe > the future determines the past. And why do the opinions of non-physicists matter on this subject? > No one chooses to believe the future > determines the past but you. That's simply wrong. Would you like some book references so you can see other people that believe this? Or do they have to come to a loon to directly talk to the loon to try to convince the loon, because the loon wants it that way? > Do you know why that is? Because the > future does not determine the past. > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > When a photon is detected by the material which is the human body it > decompresses and the effect this expansion has on the neighboring > mather generates heat. > > > Considering that you are a loon, most physicists aren't > > the least bit interested in talking with you at all. When they do, > > they usually engage with you for one or two posts and then give up in > > disgust. Personally, I find you perversely amusing, which accounts for > > my long (and pointless) conversations with you. > > > I don't have any pretense of trying to convince you of something you > > are determined not to believe. That would be like teaching algebra to > > a table leg. All I'm pointing out to you is that you've got nothing > > but assertion behind what you do believe. Even a table leg could > > figure that out. > > > > > > > It just boils your blood to ask a question, doesn't it? Asking > > > > > > questions makes you feel stupid, and you've felt stupid your whole > > > > > > life, so you'll be damned if you're going to ask a question. > > > > > > Not at all. I am always willing to ask a question when I do not > > > > > understand something. > > > > > How about photons and heat? Understand them? You were almost asking > > > > questions about them earlier. Almost. > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > When a photon is detected what occurs physically in nature is the > > > aether wave collapses when detected into a quantum of mather. When a > > > photon interacts with the material which is the human body the quantum > > > of mather expands in three dimensional space as it transitions to > > > aether and the physical effects this expansion has on the neighboring > > > mather generates heat. > > > See? Can't ask a question. The question almost comes out and then it > > just gets lodged in your throat like a chicken bone. Can't do it. It's > > a pathological problem. But you know you've got problems, so I don't > > have to tell you that. > > > > > > It just so happens I understand a moving C-60 > > > > > molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > > > > You know you have an emotional problem, right? > > > > > > > > The photon > > > > > > > is a directed/pointed wave in the aether which when detected collapses > > > > > > > into a quantum of mather. > > > > > > > > When the quantum of mather is detected in the material which is the > > > > > > > human body the mather decompresses. The physical effect of this > > > > > > > decompression on the neighboring mather is heat. > > > > > > > > > > There was a > > > > > > > > > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > > > > > > > > > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > > > > > > > > > radiates'. > > > > > > > > > I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. > > > > > > > > > When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple > > > > > > > > questions, you'll get answers. > > > > > > > > > > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > > > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > > > > > > > > > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > > > > > > > > > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > > > > > > > > > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does > > > > > > > > > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > > > > > > > > > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > > > > > > > > > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > > > > > > > > > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > > > > > > > > > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > > > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > > > > > > > > > from human bodies. > > > > > > > > > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > > > > > > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > > > > > > > > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > > > > > > > > > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > > > > > > > > > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > > > > > > > > > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > > > > > > > > > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > > > > > > > > > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > > > > > > > > > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > > > > > > > > > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. > > > > > > > > > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > > > > > > > > > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body. > >
From: mpc755 on 1 Mar 2010 16:46
On Mar 1, 4:44 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 3:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 1, 4:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 3:17 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 1, 3:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > You realize you are the only person on this forum who chooses to > > > > > > believe the future determines the past, correct? > > > > > > Nonsense. You do realize that I'm about the only trained physicist who > > > > > responds to you at all in this forum, correct? > > > > > I do realize you have to choose to believe in the future determines > > > > the past in order to support a failed theory. > > > > > > If you want to find out what physicists think, get off this forum and > > > > > start reading books. Then you'll find out. > > > > > > > And you are so full > > > > > > of absurd nonsense you think you should be asked questions about > > > > > > nature. > > > > > > > > > My definition of a photon is more correct than any other. > > > > > > > > You say it is more correct than the one than the present explanation > > > > > > > of how photons work, but you don't know the present explanation of how > > > > > > > photons work. How can what you say be more correct than something you > > > > > > > know nothing about, except by blind assertion? > > > > > > > Because anyone who chooses to believe the future determines the past > > > > > > is unqualified to speak to anything having to do with physics. > > > > > > Aha. So if you don't believe it, it's wrong? > > > > > This is an excellent way to avoid learning anything. > > > > > You would think if you were correct and there were others who > > > > supported your 'theory' which requires the future to determine the > > > > past there would be at least one other person on this forum who would > > > > be willing to state they also choose to believe the future determines > > > > the past. > > > > Not really. > > > That is more of your inability to see how incorrect you really are. > > There is not one 'physicist' on this forum willing to state they also > > choose to believe the future determines the past. > > Sure there is. This is more of your delusional denial. No one believes the future determines the past other than you. A moving C-60 molecule has an aether displacement wave. > They're just not talking to you. > Have you figured out how to get physicists to answer that question yes > or no? > When people don't talk to you, do you know what they're thinking by > reading their minds? Or do you just make it up what they think? > > You make up a lot of things. That's because you're mental. > > > There is not one non- > > physicist on this forum willing to state they also choose to believe > > the future determines the past. > > And why do the opinions of non-physicists matter on this subject? > > > No one chooses to believe the future > > determines the past but you. > > That's simply wrong. Would you like some book references so you can > see other people that believe this? Or do they have to come to a loon > to directly talk to the loon to try to convince the loon, because the > loon wants it that way? > > > Do you know why that is? Because the > > future does not determine the past. > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > When a photon is detected by the material which is the human body it > > decompresses and the effect this expansion has on the neighboring > > mather generates heat. > > > > Considering that you are a loon, most physicists aren't > > > the least bit interested in talking with you at all. When they do, > > > they usually engage with you for one or two posts and then give up in > > > disgust. Personally, I find you perversely amusing, which accounts for > > > my long (and pointless) conversations with you. > > > > I don't have any pretense of trying to convince you of something you > > > are determined not to believe. That would be like teaching algebra to > > > a table leg. All I'm pointing out to you is that you've got nothing > > > but assertion behind what you do believe. Even a table leg could > > > figure that out. > > > > > > > > It just boils your blood to ask a question, doesn't it? Asking > > > > > > > questions makes you feel stupid, and you've felt stupid your whole > > > > > > > life, so you'll be damned if you're going to ask a question. > > > > > > > Not at all. I am always willing to ask a question when I do not > > > > > > understand something. > > > > > > How about photons and heat? Understand them? You were almost asking > > > > > questions about them earlier. Almost. > > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > > When a photon is detected what occurs physically in nature is the > > > > aether wave collapses when detected into a quantum of mather. When a > > > > photon interacts with the material which is the human body the quantum > > > > of mather expands in three dimensional space as it transitions to > > > > aether and the physical effects this expansion has on the neighboring > > > > mather generates heat. > > > > See? Can't ask a question. The question almost comes out and then it > > > just gets lodged in your throat like a chicken bone. Can't do it. It's > > > a pathological problem. But you know you've got problems, so I don't > > > have to tell you that. > > > > > > > It just so happens I understand a moving C-60 > > > > > > molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > > > > > You know you have an emotional problem, right? > > > > > > > > > The photon > > > > > > > > is a directed/pointed wave in the aether which when detected collapses > > > > > > > > into a quantum of mather. > > > > > > > > > When the quantum of mather is detected in the material which is the > > > > > > > > human body the mather decompresses. The physical effect of this > > > > > > > > decompression on the neighboring mather is heat. > > > > > > > > > > > There was a > > > > > > > > > > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > > > > > > > > > > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > > > > > > > > > > radiates'. > > > > > > > > > > I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. > > > > > > > > > > When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple > > > > > > > > > questions, you'll get answers. > > > > > > > > > > > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > > > > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > > > > > > > > > > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > > > > > > > > > > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > > > > > > > > > > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does > > > > > > > > > > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > > > > > > > > > > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > > > > > > > > > > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > > > > > > > > > > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > > > > > > > > > > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > > > > > > > > > > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > > > > > > > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > > > > > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > > > > > > > > > > from human bodies. > > > > > > > > > > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > > > > > > > > > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > > > > > > > > > > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > > > > > > > > > > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > > > > > > > > > > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > > > > > > > > > > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > > > > > > > > > > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > > > > > > > > > > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > > > > > > > > > > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. > > > > > > > > > > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > > > > > > > > > > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body.. > > |