What is the disagreement to aether?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: 4-vector dot A = invariant => A is a 4-vector?
Next: Capacitance theory of gravity - interesting theory
From: mpc755 on 1 Mar 2010 14:06 On Mar 1, 1:52 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 9:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > It only makes sense to those who are unwilling or are unable to > > understand what a physical description of nature is. > > So it's a physical description if it makes sense to you and it's not > if it doesn't? > > Ah. Nice psychosis. > It is a physical description because it describes what occurs physically in nature. For example, saying a photon is absorbed. What does that mean in terms of what occurs physically in nature? Another example is the photon being absorbed causes heat to radiate. What physically occurs in nature for the absorption of a photon, which you are unable to describe in physical terms beyond the 'photon is absorbed' statement causes 'heat', which you cannot describe beyond the 'heat is radiated' statement. What you are incapable of doing is describing what is occurring physically in nature beyond making statements. There was a photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat radiates'. All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do not explain what occurs physically in nature. Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does not explain what occurs physically in nature. > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > from human bodies. > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body.
From: PD on 1 Mar 2010 14:49 On Mar 1, 1:06 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 1:52 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 1, 9:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It only makes sense to those who are unwilling or are unable to > > > understand what a physical description of nature is. > > > So it's a physical description if it makes sense to you and it's not > > if it doesn't? > > > Ah. Nice psychosis. > > It is a physical description because it describes what occurs > physically in nature. How do you KNOW it does that? What's your test? All you have is your assertion that it does. I can assert all day long that there is ice under the sand in the Sahara, but unless I tell you how I would prove that, all it is is a blank and worthless assertion. Same for you. > > For example, saying a photon is absorbed. What does that mean in terms > of what occurs physically in nature? It means the photon runs into a fermion and delivers its momentum, energy, and angular momentum. Having done that, the photon disappears, and the impacted fermion has its own momentum, energy, and angular momentum altered as a result. This is not difficult to understand physically. It's a very simple picture. > Another example is the photon > being absorbed causes heat to radiate. What physically occurs in > nature for the absorption of a photon, which you are unable to > describe in physical terms beyond the 'photon is absorbed' statement > causes 'heat', which you cannot describe beyond the 'heat is radiated' > statement. What you are saying here is, "No one has explained this to me in a way that I can understand, and so there must not be a decent explanation, and so I'll make up a wholly different explanation because at least I can understand that." > What you are incapable of doing is describing what is > occurring physically in nature beyond making statements. Of course I can. But you've never asked. All you've ever said is loop over this short series of ridiculous statements: 1. What you describe is not a physical description of nature. 2. What you describe is absurd and not believable. 3. AD is the correct description of nature. NOWHERE have you ever just sucked it up and ASKED about how photons work. > There was a > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > radiates'. I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple questions, you'll get answers. > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > from human bodies. > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body.
From: mpc755 on 1 Mar 2010 15:10 On Mar 1, 2:49 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 1:06 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 1, 1:52 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 9:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It only makes sense to those who are unwilling or are unable to > > > > understand what a physical description of nature is. > > > > So it's a physical description if it makes sense to you and it's not > > > if it doesn't? > > > > Ah. Nice psychosis. > > > It is a physical description because it describes what occurs > > physically in nature. > > How do you KNOW it does that? What's your test? All you have is your > assertion that it does. I can assert all day long that there is ice > under the sand in the Sahara, but unless I tell you how I would prove > that, all it is is a blank and worthless assertion. Same for you. > > > > > For example, saying a photon is absorbed. What does that mean in terms > > of what occurs physically in nature? > > It means the photon runs into a fermion and delivers its momentum, > energy, and angular momentum. Having done that, the photon disappears, > and the impacted fermion has its own momentum, energy, and angular > momentum altered as a result. > > This is not difficult to understand physically. It's a very simple > picture. > > > Another example is the photon > > being absorbed causes heat to radiate. What physically occurs in > > nature for the absorption of a photon, which you are unable to > > describe in physical terms beyond the 'photon is absorbed' statement > > causes 'heat', which you cannot describe beyond the 'heat is radiated' > > statement. > > What you are saying here is, "No one has explained this to me in a way > that I can understand, and so there must not be a decent explanation, > and so I'll make up a wholly different explanation because at least I > can understand that." > > > What you are incapable of doing is describing what is > > occurring physically in nature beyond making statements. > > Of course I can. But you've never asked. All you've ever said is loop > over this short series of ridiculous statements: > 1. What you describe is not a physical description of nature. > 2. What you describe is absurd and not believable. > 3. AD is the correct description of nature. > > NOWHERE have you ever just sucked it up and ASKED about how photons > work. > Why would I want to ask a question of someone who chooses to believe in the absurd nonsense of the future determining the past? My definition of a photon is more correct than any other. The photon is a directed/pointed wave in the aether which when detected collapses into a quantum of mather. When the quantum of mather is detected in the material which is the human body the mather decompresses. The physical effect of this decompression on the neighboring mather is heat. > > There was a > > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > > radiates'. > > I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. > > When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple > questions, you'll get answers. > > > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does > > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > > from human bodies. > > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. > > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body. > >
From: PD on 1 Mar 2010 15:19 On Mar 1, 2:10 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 2:49 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 1, 1:06 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 1:52 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 1, 9:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > It only makes sense to those who are unwilling or are unable to > > > > > understand what a physical description of nature is. > > > > > So it's a physical description if it makes sense to you and it's not > > > > if it doesn't? > > > > > Ah. Nice psychosis. > > > > It is a physical description because it describes what occurs > > > physically in nature. > > > How do you KNOW it does that? What's your test? All you have is your > > assertion that it does. I can assert all day long that there is ice > > under the sand in the Sahara, but unless I tell you how I would prove > > that, all it is is a blank and worthless assertion. Same for you. > > > > For example, saying a photon is absorbed. What does that mean in terms > > > of what occurs physically in nature? > > > It means the photon runs into a fermion and delivers its momentum, > > energy, and angular momentum. Having done that, the photon disappears, > > and the impacted fermion has its own momentum, energy, and angular > > momentum altered as a result. > > > This is not difficult to understand physically. It's a very simple > > picture. > > > > Another example is the photon > > > being absorbed causes heat to radiate. What physically occurs in > > > nature for the absorption of a photon, which you are unable to > > > describe in physical terms beyond the 'photon is absorbed' statement > > > causes 'heat', which you cannot describe beyond the 'heat is radiated' > > > statement. > > > What you are saying here is, "No one has explained this to me in a way > > that I can understand, and so there must not be a decent explanation, > > and so I'll make up a wholly different explanation because at least I > > can understand that." > > > > What you are incapable of doing is describing what is > > > occurring physically in nature beyond making statements. > > > Of course I can. But you've never asked. All you've ever said is loop > > over this short series of ridiculous statements: > > 1. What you describe is not a physical description of nature. > > 2. What you describe is absurd and not believable. > > 3. AD is the correct description of nature. > > > NOWHERE have you ever just sucked it up and ASKED about how photons > > work. > > Why would I want to ask a question of someone who chooses to believe > in the absurd nonsense of the future determining the past? Well, you can't complain about not knowing the physical explanation of photons if you don't ask for it, can you? > > My definition of a photon is more correct than any other. You say it is more correct than the one than the present explanation of how photons work, but you don't know the present explanation of how photons work. How can what you say be more correct than something you know nothing about, except by blind assertion? It just boils your blood to ask a question, doesn't it? Asking questions makes you feel stupid, and you've felt stupid your whole life, so you'll be damned if you're going to ask a question. You know you have an emotional problem, right? > The photon > is a directed/pointed wave in the aether which when detected collapses > into a quantum of mather. > > When the quantum of mather is detected in the material which is the > human body the mather decompresses. The physical effect of this > decompression on the neighboring mather is heat. > > > > There was a > > > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > > > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > > > radiates'. > > > I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. > > > When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple > > questions, you'll get answers. > > > > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > > > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > > > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > > > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does > > > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > > > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > > > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > > > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > > > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > > > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > > > from human bodies. > > > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > > > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > > > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > > > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > > > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > > > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > > > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > > > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. > > > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > > > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body. > >
From: mpc755 on 1 Mar 2010 15:39
On Mar 1, 3:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 2:10 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 1, 2:49 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 1:06 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 1, 1:52 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 1, 9:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > It only makes sense to those who are unwilling or are unable to > > > > > > understand what a physical description of nature is. > > > > > > So it's a physical description if it makes sense to you and it's not > > > > > if it doesn't? > > > > > > Ah. Nice psychosis. > > > > > It is a physical description because it describes what occurs > > > > physically in nature. > > > > How do you KNOW it does that? What's your test? All you have is your > > > assertion that it does. I can assert all day long that there is ice > > > under the sand in the Sahara, but unless I tell you how I would prove > > > that, all it is is a blank and worthless assertion. Same for you. > > > > > For example, saying a photon is absorbed. What does that mean in terms > > > > of what occurs physically in nature? > > > > It means the photon runs into a fermion and delivers its momentum, > > > energy, and angular momentum. Having done that, the photon disappears, > > > and the impacted fermion has its own momentum, energy, and angular > > > momentum altered as a result. > > > > This is not difficult to understand physically. It's a very simple > > > picture. > > > > > Another example is the photon > > > > being absorbed causes heat to radiate. What physically occurs in > > > > nature for the absorption of a photon, which you are unable to > > > > describe in physical terms beyond the 'photon is absorbed' statement > > > > causes 'heat', which you cannot describe beyond the 'heat is radiated' > > > > statement. > > > > What you are saying here is, "No one has explained this to me in a way > > > that I can understand, and so there must not be a decent explanation, > > > and so I'll make up a wholly different explanation because at least I > > > can understand that." > > > > > What you are incapable of doing is describing what is > > > > occurring physically in nature beyond making statements. > > > > Of course I can. But you've never asked. All you've ever said is loop > > > over this short series of ridiculous statements: > > > 1. What you describe is not a physical description of nature. > > > 2. What you describe is absurd and not believable. > > > 3. AD is the correct description of nature. > > > > NOWHERE have you ever just sucked it up and ASKED about how photons > > > work. > > > Why would I want to ask a question of someone who chooses to believe > > in the absurd nonsense of the future determining the past? > > Well, you can't complain about not knowing the physical explanation of > photons if you don't ask for it, can you? > You realize you are the only person on this forum who chooses to believe the future determines the past, correct? And you are so full of absurd nonsense you think you should be asked questions about nature. > > > > My definition of a photon is more correct than any other. > > You say it is more correct than the one than the present explanation > of how photons work, but you don't know the present explanation of how > photons work. How can what you say be more correct than something you > know nothing about, except by blind assertion? > Because anyone who chooses to believe the future determines the past is unqualified to speak to anything having to do with physics. > It just boils your blood to ask a question, doesn't it? Asking > questions makes you feel stupid, and you've felt stupid your whole > life, so you'll be damned if you're going to ask a question. > Not at all. I am always willing to ask a question when I do not understand something. It just so happens I understand a moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. > You know you have an emotional problem, right? > > > The photon > > is a directed/pointed wave in the aether which when detected collapses > > into a quantum of mather. > > > When the quantum of mather is detected in the material which is the > > human body the mather decompresses. The physical effect of this > > decompression on the neighboring mather is heat. > > > > > There was a > > > > photon and now there is no longer a photon so the photon is > > > > 'absorbed'. After the photon is 'absorbed' there is 'heat', so 'heat > > > > radiates'. > > > > I certainly didn't say that. I don't know where you got this stuff. > > > > When you can stop just making stuff up and start asking simple > > > questions, you'll get answers. > > > > > All your statements do is mimic results. Your statements do > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > Here is another example you will not understand. The poster responded > > > > with 'Heat is radiated by photons'. What is physically occurring in > > > > nature to cause 'heat' to exist and to be radiated? None of that is > > > > answered with meaningless statements like 'Absorbed photon'. What does > > > > the photon physically exist as in order for it to be absorbed? What we > > > > get from the poster is a meaningless 'Absorbed photon causes heat to > > > > be radiated'. That is not a description of what occurs physically in > > > > nature. I realize you cannot understand the point I am trying to make > > > > because you are conceptually deficient but the fact remains a > > > > statement such as 'An absorbed photon causes heat to be radiated' does > > > > not explain what occurs physically in nature. > > > > > > Heat is radiated by photons in the infrared and longer wavelenths > > > > > from human bodies. > > > > > Absorbed photon - Responses of retinal rods to single photons > > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281447/ > > > > > The photon aether wave which compresses into a quantum of mather does > > > > not continue to exist as a quantum of mather after interacting with > > > > the material which is our brains/retina. The quantum of mather > > > > decompresses back to aether. This expansion of the quantum of mather > > > > is given off by our bodies as heat. Heat is the physical effect the > > > > mather expanding into aether has on the neighboring mather. This heat > > > > is not only given off as an expansion of the mather in three > > > > dimensional space but the waves associated with the expansion. > > > > > AD explains what occurs physically in nature in order for heat to > > > > be radiated by a photon interacting with the human body. > > |