What is wrong with this argument?
in [Logic]
|
Next: arithmetic in ZF
From: Christopher A. Lee on 27 Mar 2005 07:47 On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:41:13 +0000 (UTC), bdbryant(a)mail.utexas.edu (Bobby D. Bryant) wrote: >On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, "The great philosopher-criminologist" <bedford_park2000(a)yahoo.ca> wrote: > >> What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways? > >It's a claim, not an argument. It's not even a claim, it's a question-begging fallacy.
From: The great philosopher-criminologist on 27 Mar 2005 08:28 kathryn wrote: > "The great philosopher-criminologist" <bedford_park2000(a)yahoo.ca> wrote in > message news:1111874993.415822.226320(a)l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways? > > > There is no god > Something that doesn't exist cannot work in anyway let alone mysteriously Well, this God has been credited with the success of certain people in this world.
From: The great philosopher-criminologist on 27 Mar 2005 08:33 Milan wrote: > 5. "Mysterious" should be lower case. The computer made that mistake.
From: Robibnikoff on 27 Mar 2005 09:05 "The great philosopher-criminologist" <bedford_park2000(a)yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:1111874993.415822.226320(a)l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways? Nothing. Believing it, however, is the height of idiocy as there's no evidence this god thing exists. -- --------- Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557
From: Robibnikoff on 27 Mar 2005 09:08
"The great philosopher-criminologist" <bedford_park2000(a)yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:1111882637.238261.256340(a)g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > L. Raymond wrote: >> On 26 Mar 2005 14:09:53 -0800, The great philosopher-criminologist >> wrote: >> >> > What is wrong with saying that God works in Mysterious ways? >> >> Well for starters your capitalization is all messed up... > > The computer's fault. It's a poor workman that blames his tools. -- --------- Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 |