From: Rod Speed on 23 Nov 2009 04:21 John Turco wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> John Turco wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> David Brown wrote: >>> <edited for brevity> >> Why do you only do that to mine ? > No, please don't take it personally. I do. > I don't discriminate against anybody A likely story... > and often delete extraneous text, simply in order > to confine my responses to relevant comments. My comment are always relevant. >>>>> while Win95 OSR2 and Win98SE were solid enough to use if you were reasonably careful. >>>> They were solid enough to use even if you werent. >>>> So was ME if you had even half a clue too. >>> Albeit, I must admit that Windows Millennium did cause a few >>> minor headaches, in my roughly 33 months of using it (before >>> I replaced it with XP, in February of 2007). >>> One such annoyance (which is well documented, on both Usenet >>> and the WWW) was its refusal to shut down, gracefully...often, >>> it would just "hang" there, thus forcing me to employ my >>> computer's power or reset buttons. >> You sure that wasnt SE ? > I'm certain. Well, I had used 98SE, before "upgrading" to ME; > in my estimation, ME proved to be somewhat of a downgrade. On that shutdown question ? Thats the opposite of what everyone else found. |