What this Universe would have been if there were no gravity?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: A nomenclature puzzle about gradients, divergences and fields
Next: Newton's law of gravitational attraction
From: Autymn D. C. on 3 Oct 2009 21:46 On Sep 28, 9:46 am, "Anthony Buckland" <anthonybucklandnos...(a)telus.net> wrote: > What good is gravity? It's weak, but long range, > and everything attracts everything else, with > nothing gravitationally repelling anything else. > It untiringly drags things together, and that has > led to all the interesting aspects of the universe. Gravity is limp: http://google.com/groups?q=%22Comparisons+for+the+illiterate%22.
From: Autymn D. C. on 3 Oct 2009 22:07 On Sep 25, 5:22 am, "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" <ahmed.ou...(a)welho.com> wrote: > Whatsoever, as it just should be known, that an atom, is everywhere on the > atmosphere as along any chemical number along any proton along its nuclei, > all along, the define reason, that is already known as along that matter, > its atomic number... > > Therefore, as along a weak force or a strong force, the existence as the > behavioral conditions of an atom would not change but a definitely it > changes any molecule as any particle along the third which is the chemical > one... > > However, as whether would change any other behaviours as any attempt of what > it touches, as anything would be recognized only along its number which is > an atomical number, along its behaviours as along an eventual quatisation of > its a chemical side, and this is a simply what is all about a definitely as > a matter a fact... Shut the hell up, babbler cretin.
From: BradGuth on 4 Oct 2009 01:05 On Oct 3, 4:32 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Sep 19, 3:14 pm, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 10:25 pm, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > The Computer chats like Humans. > > > Believe it???:http://www.GetClub.com > > > Now you believe it. What do you say? > > > Perhaps your AI responded correctly, because most folks responding are > > pretend-Atheists and otherwise represent the worse possible kinds of > > humanity. > > How is that? A computer form of AI is pure logic, though Sanny AI is still flawed. ~ BG
From: BradGuth on 4 Oct 2009 01:08 On Oct 3, 7:00 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Sep 26, 6:57 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > w/o gravity there is no such thing as up or down, not that atoms or > > whatever matter of zero gravity would care. > > > w/o gravity, perhaps solar systems and galaxies would be more like > > large atoms, instead of forming flat disk like. Perhaps everything > > becomes round, spherical or balloon like. > > There would still be up and down. Strong silty bodies of LiH·Li* and > BeH2·Li* would clump instead. That seems logical enough. ~ BG
From: BradGuth on 5 Oct 2009 14:12
On Oct 5, 10:41 am, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > Dear Autymn D. C.: > > On Oct 3, 4:29 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 9:55 am,dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > > Dear Sanny: > > > On Sep 18, 8:51 am, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Just imagine God asks all Gravitons to vanish. > > > > > Now what will happen? > > > > IMHO, all processes become quantum processes > > > only, since spacetime also vanishes. > > > Gravitòns already were quanta, dolt. > > Gravitons have to carry spacetime into the quantum realm. So when > they stop doing that... > > But of course, you know everything, and are just a sniper anyway... > > David A. Smith The biodiversity including human genetics and our complex physiology is not glued together or otherwise dominated via gravity. What holds cosmic stuff together is also for the most part not related to gravity, but instead affected and obviously influenced by the extremely weak force of gravity. ~ BG |