From: HVAC on

"chazwin" <chazwyman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7bf7ddb0-f84d-440d-bb91-6e423e86333f(a)m13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
>
> There is no gravity but the property of matter whereby it is attracted
> to itself.


No.


From: BradGuth on
On Oct 24, 12:10 pm, "HVAC" <harlowcampb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> "chazwin" <chazwy...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7bf7ddb0-f84d-440d-bb91-6e423e86333f(a)m13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > There is no gravity but the property of matter whereby it is attracted
> > to itself.
>
> No.

That was a two part reply from "chazwin" that deserves at least a two
part answer.

~ BG
From: BURT on
On Oct 24, 10:18 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 12:10 pm, "HVAC" <harlowcampb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "chazwin" <chazwy...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:7bf7ddb0-f84d-440d-bb91-6e423e86333f(a)m13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > There is no gravity but the property of matter whereby it is attracted
> > > to itself.
>
> > No.

This is backward to what Einstein said. He said that gravity was a
property of space and time curvature.



>
> That was a two part reply from "chazwin" that deserves at least a two
> part answer.
>
>  ~ BG

From: BradGuth on
On Oct 24, 12:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 10:18 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 24, 12:10 pm, "HVAC" <harlowcampb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > "chazwin" <chazwy...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:7bf7ddb0-f84d-440d-bb91-6e423e86333f(a)m13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > > There is no gravity but the property of matter whereby it is attracted
> > > > to itself.
>
> > > No.
>
> This is backward to what Einstein said. He said that gravity was a
> property of space and time curvature.
>
>
>
> > That was a two part reply from "chazwin" that deserves at least a two
> > part answer.
>
> >  ~ BG

That sounds a little better, because it's certainly not much of a
force unless considering truly massive things like stars and black
holes, or items that are extremely dense and close to one another that
seem to represent some extra pull or binding force, though could be
just the electron/positron kind of secondary interaction that we
interpret as gravity.

~ BG
From: Double-A on
On Oct 24, 5:06 pm, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 12:55 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 24, 10:18 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 24, 12:10 pm, "HVAC" <harlowcampb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "chazwin" <chazwy...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:7bf7ddb0-f84d-440d-bb91-6e423e86333f(a)m13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > There is no gravity but the property of matter whereby it is attracted
> > > > > to itself.
>
> > > > No.
>
> > This is backward to what Einstein said. He said that gravity was a
> > property of space and time curvature.
>
> > > That was a two part reply from "chazwin" that deserves at least a two
> > > part answer.
>
> > >  ~ BG
>
> That sounds a little better, because it's certainly not much of a
> force unless considering truly massive things like stars and black
> holes, or items that are extremely dense and close to one another that
> seem to represent some extra pull or binding force, though could be
> just the electron/positron kind of secondary interaction that we
> interpret as gravity.
>
>  ~ BG

Perhaps involving the exchange of photons of a frequency too high for
us to detect.

Double-A