What this Universe would have been if there were no gravity?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: A nomenclature puzzle about gradients, divergences and fields
Next: Newton's law of gravitational attraction
From: BradGuth on 27 Sep 2009 17:13 On Sep 27, 12:14 pm, Maverick <jorgensen.jes...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > On 18 Sep, 16:51, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Just imagine God asks all Gravitons to vanish. > > > Now what will happen? How will earth behave? > > > What will happen to oceans/ Sun/ moon. > > > Can there be life without gravity? > > > Imagine after Big bang there is no gravity. How this Universe/ Stars > > would have behaved in such a case? > > > No Black holes will form. Stars will evaporate within seconds. > > > What else you can think of? > > > Bye > > Sanny > > > The Computer chats like Humans. > > Believe it???:http://www.GetClub.com > > Now you believe it. What do you say? > > If gravety disapeared, the larger masses, will pull lesser masses at > accumulated speeds, equal to escalate turbulance that will form into > new masses by random inpact. these formations will form a new > universe. I regard Your post as babble, and can only smile at the 5 > "stars" has been awarded by a provecator. > > But to make a point about accumulated speeds: > > Regarding lightspeed. > > http://groups.google.co.uk/group/exceeded-lightspeed > > As supernova explotions or the Big Bang theory implies, matter is > thrown by bigger force in various directions and speeds. > > If some matter is thrown at 2/3 of the speed of light in one > direction, and other matter is thrown in oppersit direction at the > same speed from origen,- theese will travel apart at 1 1/3 of the > speed of light. > > This tells us travel beyond the speed of light is possible. > > This also explains why we cannot see app. 90 % of the universe. > Dark matter appears to be hyperspace to me. > > Think of the antiquated rules that led our forfathers to > believe that we could not travel beyond the speed of sound. > > regards > > Jesper Hjulmand Jorgensen > Jorgensen.jes...(a)gmail.com > > Ps.: Energy equals mass squared minus unknown quantity of deteriation > squared. > We now from particle-accelerators that neutrons accelerate above the > speed of light to find a partner(turning into dark matter). > Electricity is working at lightspeed in controled leeds. How wil You > account for powersurges? What would change w/o gravity (as if the weak force of gravity never existed in the first place)? What does gravity mean to the shape and function of a jellyfish? ~ BG
From: jmfbahciv on 28 Sep 2009 07:31 Jonah Thomas wrote: > jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: >> BradGuth wrote: >>> jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > >>>> Based on what you wrote here, you seem to think that matter was >>>> made and then gravity was added. Do you know what space-time >>>> is? >>>> >>> w/o gravity atoms would still be atoms. Obviously you got a problem >>> with that. >> Gravity is what you measure when there are lots of atoms in an >> volume. Why do you think there wouldn't be any gravity to measure >> if all existing atoms are equally disbursed throughout space? >> You may not be able to discern its existence but outside the >> space-time one should be able to measure the constant. > > He's asking what kind of universe we'd have if the gravitational > constant was zero. > > I think he wants to assume that this could be changed without changing > any fundamental laws, just make this one change. > > I don't know whether that could be done since I don't have any idea how > to change the gravitational constant at all. But he's keeping the definition of mass. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 28 Sep 2009 07:36 BradGuth wrote: > On Sep 27, 12:14 pm, Maverick <jorgensen.jes...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 18 Sep, 16:51, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Just imagine God asks all Gravitons to vanish. >>> Now what will happen? How will earth behave? >>> What will happen to oceans/ Sun/ moon. >>> Can there be life without gravity? >>> Imagine after Big bang there is no gravity. How this Universe/ Stars >>> would have behaved in such a case? >>> No Black holes will form. Stars will evaporate within seconds. >>> What else you can think of? >>> Bye >>> Sanny >>> The Computer chats like Humans. >>> Believe it???:http://www.GetClub.com >>> Now you believe it. What do you say? >> If gravety disapeared, the larger masses, will pull lesser masses at >> accumulated speeds, equal to escalate turbulance that will form into >> new masses by random inpact. these formations will form a new >> universe. I regard Your post as babble, and can only smile at the 5 >> "stars" has been awarded by a provecator. >> >> But to make a point about accumulated speeds: >> >> Regarding lightspeed. >> >> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/exceeded-lightspeed >> >> As supernova explotions or the Big Bang theory implies, matter is >> thrown by bigger force in various directions and speeds. >> >> If some matter is thrown at 2/3 of the speed of light in one >> direction, and other matter is thrown in oppersit direction at the >> same speed from origen,- theese will travel apart at 1 1/3 of the >> speed of light. >> >> This tells us travel beyond the speed of light is possible. >> >> This also explains why we cannot see app. 90 % of the universe. >> Dark matter appears to be hyperspace to me. >> >> Think of the antiquated rules that led our forfathers to >> believe that we could not travel beyond the speed of sound. >> >> regards >> >> Jesper Hjulmand Jorgensen >> Jorgensen.jes...(a)gmail.com >> >> Ps.: Energy equals mass squared minus unknown quantity of deteriation >> squared. >> We now from particle-accelerators that neutrons accelerate above the >> speed of light to find a partner(turning into dark matter). >> Electricity is working at lightspeed in controled leeds. How wil You >> account for powersurges? > > What would change w/o gravity (as if the weak force of gravity never > existed in the first place)? > > What does gravity mean to the shape and function of a jellyfish? > Are you also eliminating pressure and temperature from the universe? /BAH
From: BradGuth on 28 Sep 2009 08:40 On Sep 28, 4:32 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > BradGuth wrote: > > > What does a jellyfish care about gravity? > > Food. > > /BAH You're not thinking this one though. Instead you're just being mainstream negative and otherwise naysay out of spite. Good for you, proving that the human mind is not even remotely intelligent as based upon your genetic mutations of evolution, and sustaining your status quo at all cost. Did you forget the original topic? "What this Universe would have been if there were no gravity?" Here a good one: win yourself a Nobel Prize by telling us exactly what this extremely weak force of gravity is, and how it works. ~ BG
From: BradGuth on 28 Sep 2009 08:48
On Sep 28, 4:36 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > > Are you also eliminating pressure and temperature from the universe? > > /BAH No, just removing the extremely weak force of gravity. All other forces stay the same (according to the intent of this topic). Are you suggesting that gravity is actually a strong force? Are you suggesting that it's impossible for matter and complex life to survive and evolve w/o gravity? Are you suggesting that DNA/RNA needs the weak force of gravity? ~ BG |