Who is really the 'personality' that calls himself 'Inertial' ??!!
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Defining the "War On Some Drugs"
Next: All laws in science are based upon explanations of observations. All explanations are theoretical. Therefore laws are theories.
From: Inertial on 6 Jun 2010 21:24 "eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:huhgio$uvp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Inertial wrote: > > [...] > >> Why do you even care? Are you an obsessed stalker? > > You clearly don't remember him following me everywhere dropping my > url. I even took the time to change it, and he found it again and posted > it > more. Oh .. I remember it. The silly thing is, it was quite a nice smiling face you had there, yet he seemed to think it was somehow demeaning. Porat is a low-life scum who has no sense of morals or ethics or respect or honesty .. and even less knowledge or understanding of physics (the subject he has unfortunately decided will be the one where he will make some great 'innovation', without actually taking the time to learn anything about even the basics of it). I do feel very sorry for him .. its must be terrible to see your last lonely years wasted away in futile attempts at fame, and at the same time filled with such obvious loathing and hatred for his fellow man. I look forward with great joy receiving the news of of his inevitable (and hopefully imminent) demise. That's if anyone even cares enough to report it. RIP Porat .. your soul and humanity is long dead and just waiting for your body to catch up.
From: Y.Porat on 6 Jun 2010 22:15 On Jun 7, 3:24 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:huhgio$uvp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > Inertial wrote: > > > [...] > > >> Why do you even care? Are you an obsessed stalker? > > > You clearly don't remember him following me everywhere dropping my > > url. I even took the time to change it, and he found it again and posted > > it > > more. > > Oh .. I remember it. The silly thing is, it was quite a nice smiling face > you had there, yet he seemed to think it was somehow demeaning. > > Porat is a low-life scum who has no sense of morals or ethics or respect or > honesty .. and even less knowledge or understanding of physics (the subject > he has unfortunately decided will be the one where he will make some great > 'innovation', without actually taking the time to learn anything about even > the basics of it). > > I do feel very sorry for him .. its must be terrible to see your last lonely > years wasted away in futile attempts at fame, and at the same time filled > with such obvious loathing and hatred for his fellow man. > > I look forward with great joy receiving the news of of his inevitable (and > hopefully imminent) demise. That's if anyone even cares enough to report > it. > > RIP Porat .. your soul and humanity is long dead and just waiting for your > body to catch up. --------------------- lonely life ??? (:-) apparently you speak about yourself .... i have 3 sons and 7 grand sons and 4000 readers.. here !! how many do you have ??? how is your drunken boy friend from Australia ?? (is that why you are afraid to reveal some basic private information (:-) 2 what are the scalars of photon momentum?? why are you so afraid or unable to tell us Yehiel .Porat .....(:-) -------------------
From: Y.Porat on 6 Jun 2010 22:17 On Jun 7, 2:45 am, "whoever" <whoe...(a)whereever.com> wrote: > "dlzc" <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote in message > > news:9b948407-4665-47e2-93be-6e275af76b5a(a)n37g2000prc.googlegroups.com... > > > > > Dear Y. Porat: > > > On Jun 5, 5:55 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can anyone who is an expert on > >> i p addresses > >> reveal the mask from the anonymous > >> 'personality' that calls himself sometimes Artful > >> in other cases ' Inertial ' ?? > >> (and only God knows about how many other names ) > > >> if not the exact name > >> may be country ?? > >> State ?? > >> City ?? > >> (as a start ) > >> and will do by that -some good sevice to the > >> possible better achievements of this NG > > >> TIA > >> Y.Porat > >> ------------------------------------- > > > Anyone should know how to accomplish WHOIS by now. That gets you the > > state, perhaps the city (reliably). Narrows this person down to 1 in > > a million or so. > > I'd agree .. I'm one in a million :):):) > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net --- -------------------- No 3 (:-) Y.P ------------------------------
From: Inertial on 6 Jun 2010 22:21 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:fbe1d44c-65ee-4011-8bc5-c48656786631(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 7, 2:45 am, "whoever" <whoe...(a)whereever.com> wrote: >> "dlzc" <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote in message >> >> news:9b948407-4665-47e2-93be-6e275af76b5a(a)n37g2000prc.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > Dear Y. Porat: >> >> > On Jun 5, 5:55 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Can anyone who is an expert on >> >> i p addresses >> >> reveal the mask from the anonymous >> >> 'personality' that calls himself sometimes Artful >> >> in other cases ' Inertial ' ?? >> >> (and only God knows about how many other names ) >> >> >> if not the exact name >> >> may be country ?? >> >> State ?? >> >> City ?? >> >> (as a start ) >> >> and will do by that -some good sevice to the >> >> possible better achievements of this NG >> >> >> TIA >> >> Y.Porat >> >> ------------------------------------- >> >> > Anyone should know how to accomplish WHOIS by now. That gets you the >> > state, perhaps the city (reliably). Narrows this person down to 1 in >> > a million or so. >> >> I'd agree .. I'm one in a million :):):) >> >> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net --- > > -------------------- > No 3 (:-) That's actually funny and somewhat clever. The first somewhat clever things you've posted for a while.
From: Y.Porat on 9 Jun 2010 10:56
On Jun 9, 11:07 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:bbecc2ce-da2d-455a-8316-f7a209f2b9e0(a)x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jun 8, 5:23 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:52e41692-099f-4537-bdae-d59024a48d6e(a)i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > On Jun 8, 6:30 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > >> >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >> >>news:5f893080-52ff-4878-b1bf-a2da669c9380(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > >> >> > On Jun 7, 5:49 pm, "Inertia > 6000 serious readers !! > > You're a joke Porat .. a sad pathetic joke. And as you have no interest in > learning physics, or controlling your foul little temper, you're destined to > remain a joke until you die (heopfully very very soon) ------------------------------- (:-) th e litle Nazi pig that is whishes me die again and again but who would make you to** retreat** from your scalar momentum IF NOT ME ?? EVERY ONE CANSEE THAT IT WAS UNDER MY PRESSURE !! SO PHOTON MOMENTUM IS NOT JUST A SCALAR IT IS A VECTOR (a shame on this ng that we have to deal with such a 'dilemma ''' and wast so much bandwidth on an issue that a secondary school should do it at once anyway we are not done yet !! so now i have a question to some of my 7000 thousand readers (not to Inertial he is a lost case ):: is the M L/T ****dimensions*** are good enough TO DESCRIBE AND DEFINE A PHOTON MOMENTUM ?? if not what else is missing ?? TIA Y.Porat ---------------------------- |