Prev: Whacksman-Obammo -- CCX & CBOE funders
Next: Anders, Ebihara Re: additive versus multiplicative creation: Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #180; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Koobee Wublee on 20 Jun 2010 01:12
On Jun 19, 12:19 pm, Mitchell Jones wrote:

> Of course, it has now been demonstrated that a clock in GPS orbit loses
> time relative to an identical clock at sea level. The proof: the clocks
> intended for GPS orbit have to be adjusted, while on the ground, to run
> 38 microseconds per day slower than a standard ground-based clock, to
> ensure that, when in GPS orbit, they will speed up enough to keep pace
> with clocks on the ground.

Nonsense. As long as all the satellite clocks run at the same
frequency, it will be fine regardless of what frequency the ground
system run at. <shrug>

The rest of howling nonsense is mercifully snipped to preserve
sanity. Study how the GPS actually works first instead of rambling
out howling like a mad dog.


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Whacksman-Obammo -- CCX & CBOE funders
Next: Anders, Ebihara Re: additive versus multiplicative creation: Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #180; ATOM TOTALITY