From: baynole2 on
Nice language, guy.
From: Shadow on
On Fri, 07 May 2010 15:42:47 -0400, za kAT wrote:

> On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>
>> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates -
>> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard
>> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike.
>
> Except for the drug runners.
>
> <VVBG>
You exagerate !
bear bottoms "pilot required" drug running
brought only 44 replies.
See ? Anonymous !!!
[]'s
PS I also tried the search in Bing and was redirected to the CIA.
What's a CIA ?


From: Ari on
On Sat, 8 May 2010 12:51:05 +0000 (UTC), Shadow wrote:

> On Fri, 07 May 2010 15:42:47 -0400, za kAT wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>>> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates -
>>> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard
>>> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike.
>>
>> Except for the drug runners.
>>
>> <VVBG>
> You exagerate !
> bear bottoms "pilot required" drug running
> brought only 44 replies.
> See ? Anonymous !!!
> []'s
> PS I also tried the search in Bing and was redirected to the CIA.
> What's a CIA ?

It's the only other entity that you don't put "the" in front of e.g.
"God".
--
Talk about F-Cars - www.ferrarichat.com/forum/member.php?u=89702
Real estate? - www.sowal.com/bb/members/ari-silverstein.html
From: za kAT on
On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:

> za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in
> news:4be46d48(a)news.x-privat.org:
>
>> On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>>> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates -
>>> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard
>>> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike.
>>
>> Except for the drug runners.
>>
>> <VVBG>
>
> I wouldn't know. I've never been on the illegal side of that game. I did
> see a lot who were. Never saw one that won...course one wouldn't see
> those would they.

Looks like the forager is back.
--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
From: za kAT on
On Sun, 9 May 2010 20:41:50 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:

> za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in news:4be6ee8a$1(a)news.x-
> privat.org:
>
>> On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>>> za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:4be46d48(a)news.x-privat.org:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates -
>>>>> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard
>>>>> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike.
>>>>
>>>> Except for the drug runners.
>>>>
>>>> <VVBG>
>>>
>>> I wouldn't know. I've never been on the illegal side of that game. I did
>>> see a lot who were. Never saw one that won...course one wouldn't see
>>> those would they.
>>
>> Looks like the forager is back.
>
> I just said that.
>
> You must be the forager.

I'm the forager. The dead bird woz /never/ wrong!

--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com