From: baynole2 on 7 May 2010 20:24 Nice language, guy.
From: Shadow on 8 May 2010 08:51 On Fri, 07 May 2010 15:42:47 -0400, za kAT wrote: > On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: > >> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates - >> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard >> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike. > > Except for the drug runners. > > <VVBG> You exagerate ! bear bottoms "pilot required" drug running brought only 44 replies. See ? Anonymous !!! []'s PS I also tried the search in Bing and was redirected to the CIA. What's a CIA ?
From: Ari on 8 May 2010 12:46 On Sat, 8 May 2010 12:51:05 +0000 (UTC), Shadow wrote: > On Fri, 07 May 2010 15:42:47 -0400, za kAT wrote: > >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: >> >>> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates - >>> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard >>> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike. >> >> Except for the drug runners. >> >> <VVBG> > You exagerate ! > bear bottoms "pilot required" drug running > brought only 44 replies. > See ? Anonymous !!! > []'s > PS I also tried the search in Bing and was redirected to the CIA. > What's a CIA ? It's the only other entity that you don't put "the" in front of e.g. "God". -- Talk about F-Cars - www.ferrarichat.com/forum/member.php?u=89702 Real estate? - www.sowal.com/bb/members/ari-silverstein.html
From: za kAT on 9 May 2010 13:18 On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: > za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in > news:4be46d48(a)news.x-privat.org: > >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: >> >>> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates - >>> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard >>> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike. >> >> Except for the drug runners. >> >> <VVBG> > > I wouldn't know. I've never been on the illegal side of that game. I did > see a lot who were. Never saw one that won...course one wouldn't see > those would they. Looks like the forager is back. -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
From: za kAT on 9 May 2010 17:23 On Sun, 9 May 2010 20:41:50 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: > za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in news:4be6ee8a$1(a)news.x- > privat.org: > >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: >> >>> za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in >>> news:4be46d48(a)news.x-privat.org: >>> >>>> On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates - >>>>> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard >>>>> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike. >>>> >>>> Except for the drug runners. >>>> >>>> <VVBG> >>> >>> I wouldn't know. I've never been on the illegal side of that game. I did >>> see a lot who were. Never saw one that won...course one wouldn't see >>> those would they. >> >> Looks like the forager is back. > > I just said that. > > You must be the forager. I'm the forager. The dead bird woz /never/ wrong! -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: alt.comp.freeware links at Fri May 7 21:20:02 2010 Next: Microsoft Security essentials Review |