From: za kAT on
On Sun, 9 May 2010 20:41:50 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:

> za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in news:4be6ee8a$1(a)news.x-
> privat.org:
>
>> On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>>> za kAT <zakAT(a)johnstubbings.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:4be46d48(a)news.x-privat.org:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 7 May 2010 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is interesting is your reference to Tanya which demonstrates -
>>>>> short of a few minor physical differences and a few haphazard
>>>>> preferences - humans are 99.9% alike.
>>>>
>>>> Except for the drug runners.
>>>>
>>>> <VVBG>
>>>
>>> I wouldn't know. I've never been on the illegal side of that game. I did
>>> see a lot who were. Never saw one that won...course one wouldn't see
>>> those would they.
>>
>> Looks like the forager is back.
>
> I just said that.
>
> You must be the forager.

No that would be you, John.
--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
From: Windy on
I think Scroogle is no more! Site has a statement.

"WhItE RaBBiT" <WhiTE.RAbbIT(a)Go.Ask.Alice.org> wrote in message
news:Xns9D70F0A06299Dpinkeye(a)94.75.214.39...
> Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9D70CEBAB8B87bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)69.16.185.247:
>
>> Google logs an astonishing amount of data, including the search logs from
>> its flagship product.
>
> Scroogle can help.
>
> https://ssl.scroogle.org/
>
>


From: Shadow on
On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:33:56 +0100, Windy wrote:

> I think Scroogle is no more! Site has a statement.
So google scrood scroogle.
:(
From: John Corliss on
Shadow wrote:
> Windy wrote:
>>
>> I think Scroogle is no more! Site has a statement.
>
> So google scrood scroogle.
> :(

There's nothing wrong with Scroogle. See for yourself:

http://www.scroogle.org

Or better yet:

http://www.scroogle.org/donatesc.html

--
John Corliss BS206. Because of all the Googlespam, I block all posts
sent through Google Groups. I also block as many posts from anonymous
remailers (like x-privat.org for eg.) as possible due to forgeries
posted through them.

No ad, CD, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share, spy, time-limited,
trial or web wares OR warez for me, please. Adobe Flash sucks, DivX rules.
From: Craig on
On 05/12/2010 12:18 AM, John Corliss wrote:
> Shadow wrote:
>> Windy wrote:
>>>
>>> I think Scroogle is no more! Site has a statement.
>>
>> So google scrood scroogle.
>> :(
>
> There's nothing wrong with Scroogle. See for yourself:
>
> http://www.scroogle.org
>
> Or better yet:
>
> http://www.scroogle.org/donatesc.html

Yup. Working here.


--
-Craig