Prev: Trajectory branching in Liouville space as the source ofirreversibility
Next: Shape of the Universe
From: xray4abc on 31 May 2010 13:25
On May 31, 11:00 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Why NASA tells us we have 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter and 4.6%
> Atoms.
>
> The majority of scientists have absolutely no answer for this.
>
> (click link)
>
> http://www.amperefitz.com/dark.m.e.htm
>
> This is simply incredible!
>
> Fitz

It is *that* incredible,that I do not share your enthusiasm about it,
though
I have never gave any credit to the Big Bang theory as well.
Anyway, it is good to have new ideas and reanalyze things.
Best regards, LL
From: eric gisse on 31 May 2010 17:04
xray4abc wrote:

> On May 31, 11:00 am, fitz <zeus...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Why NASA tells us we have 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter and 4.6%
>> Atoms.
>>
>> The majority of scientists have absolutely no answer for this.
>>
>> (click link)
>>
>> http://www.amperefitz.com/dark.m.e.htm
>>
>> This is simply incredible!
>>
>> Fitz
>
> It is *that* incredible,that I do not share your enthusiasm about it,
> though
> I have never gave any credit to the Big Bang theory as well.
> Anyway, it is good to have new ideas and reanalyze things.
> Best regards, LL

Armchair skepticism from folks who have been posting here for years but
still can't work through an undergraduate mechanics problem is always
welcome.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Trajectory branching in Liouville space as the source ofirreversibility
Next: Shape of the Universe