From: Jolly Roger on
In article <barmar-FCB8F6.01363126112009(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Barry Margolin <barmar(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> In article <jollyroger-A036DD.00003326112009(a)news.individual.net>,
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > Gracefully give up and try again later. After -x- or more consecutive
> > tries, *then* take them offline. Most email connectivity issues are
> > temporary, after all, IME.
>
> But it's not a connectivity issue. It's an explicit error response to
> the password. If servers weren't so buggy, this would always be a true
> problem with the password.
>
> Probably Mail should behave differently if this happens when you click
> on "Get Mail" versus scheduled mail downloads, or if Mail is in the
> foreground or background. If it's the foreground application or you
> manually ask it to download mail, it should show the error immediately.
> But if it's running in the background and doing automatic downloads, you
> don't need to be annoyed immediately.
>
> However, the problem with this is that you might never bring mail to the
> foreground. I leave Mail running all the time, but I only select it
> when the badge shows that I have new mail, or I want to send an email.
> If it's having problems logging in, I'd never find out if it didn't pop
> up an alert.

That's why it would display a message "after -x- or more consecutive
tries", like I said.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: Jolly Roger on
In article <barmar-7762AB.01294026112009(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Barry Margolin <barmar(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> In article <jollyroger-722027.23554425112009(a)news.individual.net>,
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <barmar-6A8F0A.23462825112009(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
> > Barry Margolin <barmar(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <jollyroger-7A811D.19151725112009(a)news.individual.net>,
> > > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Actually, the OP and I are talking about what happens if the connection
> > > > fails.
> > >
> > > I've never seen it ask for the password when that happens. In that case
> > > it just marks the account offline with, I think with a triangle with "!"
> > > in it.
> > >
> > > It only asks for a new password if the connection succeeds and login
> > > fails.
> >
> > Did you read the OP? He didn't claim it asked for a password.
>
> Did you? Here's the first sentence:
>
> > Often, I have a window pop up asking for my password for accounts that
> > have gone off-line for no apparent reason.

My bad. SOmehow I skimmed past that part.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: TaliesinSoft on
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:56:00 -0600, Paul Sture wrote (in article
<paul.nospam-88AF9D.09560026112009(a)pbook.sture.ch>):

> I have a POP account with my ISP and several IMAP accounts with a hosting
> company.

I'm one with a single IMAP mail account with MobileMe and don't feel the need
for more than that. I haven't had (at least to my awareness) any problems
with Mail via MobileMe.

--
James Leo Ryan --- Austin, Texas --- taliesinsoft(a)me.com

From: Barry Margolin on
In article <paul.nospam-CB2BDE.10085626112009(a)pbook.sture.ch>,
Paul Sture <paul.nospam(a)sture.ch> wrote:

> In article <jollyroger-A036DD.00003326112009(a)news.individual.net>,
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > Asking for a password is one thing. Taking accounts offline and refusing
> > to check email again for them until the user manually re-enables them is
> > another. Entourage doesn't do it. Others I have used in the past,
> > including Outlook Express and Claris Emailer, didn't used do it either.
>
> I suppose it's better than Mail several OS X versions back, where it
> would repeatedly ask for the password to the point where I would exit
> Mail altogether.

I never noticed that. But what I did notice in Tiger was that if it was
left with the password prompt for too long, Mail would start to use more
and more CPU time. I would often wake up in the morning, or come home
from work, and find Mail.app barely responsive because it got one of
these errors a few hours earlier while I was away from the computer.

--
Barry Margolin, barmar(a)alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
From: Paul Sture on
In article <barmar-D6D16F.18010226112009(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Barry Margolin <barmar(a)alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> In article <paul.nospam-CB2BDE.10085626112009(a)pbook.sture.ch>,
> Paul Sture <paul.nospam(a)sture.ch> wrote:
>
> > In article <jollyroger-A036DD.00003326112009(a)news.individual.net>,
> > Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Asking for a password is one thing. Taking accounts offline and refusing
> > > to check email again for them until the user manually re-enables them is
> > > another. Entourage doesn't do it. Others I have used in the past,
> > > including Outlook Express and Claris Emailer, didn't used do it either.
> >
> > I suppose it's better than Mail several OS X versions back, where it
> > would repeatedly ask for the password to the point where I would exit
> > Mail altogether.
>
> I never noticed that. But what I did notice in Tiger was that if it was
> left with the password prompt for too long, Mail would start to use more
> and more CPU time. I would often wake up in the morning, or come home
> from work, and find Mail.app barely responsive because it got one of
> these errors a few hours earlier while I was away from the computer.

I must have been lucky. I never witnessed that.

--
Paul Sture