Prev: Confusion in address generation for MIG generated DDR2 interface
Next: Writing Hex values to file in VHDL?
From: Chris Abele on 22 Mar 2010 21:06 On 3/22/2010 7:41 PM, Michael S wrote: > On Mar 22, 11:54 pm, Petter Gustad<newsmailco...(a)gustad.com> wrote: >> General Schvantzkoph<schvantzk...(a)yahoo.com> writes: >>> Nothing beats Emacs >> >> I agree! I hate Eclipse. >> > > I hate Eclipse too. But I don't like Emacs. > Gimme something simple, preferably Multi-Edit. Wow! That's a blast from the past - I used Multi-Edit for years and loved it.
From: Patrick Maupin on 22 Mar 2010 21:58 On Mar 22, 2:43 pm, Philippe <philippe.f...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) have long been the primary > tool for software engineers. Like an airplane cockpit, an IDE is the > control center from which the engineer accesses all of the data and > tools that he needs. IDEs, and especially Eclipse, have proven to be > extensible, open, high quality platforms. IDEs have long been the primary tool for wannabe code jockeys who throw things together without really understanding how things work. There, FTFY. Pat
From: rickman on 22 Mar 2010 23:52 On Mar 22, 7:36 pm, Eric Smith <space...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 22, 2:36 pm, "M. Norton" <remill...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On whole I agree with you, however let's be realistic, the learning > > curve for Emacs is incredibly steep. > > A steep learning curve is a Good Thing. If it was shallow, it would > take you a very long time to learn it. I didn't see a smiley at the end of that one... is it possible you are serious? Rick
From: Eric Smith on 23 Mar 2010 01:44 Think about it. When you graph the learning curve, what are the axes?
From: Kim Enkovaara on 23 Mar 2010 02:27
Alan Fitch wrote: > I also found it seemed slow (probably because I was running it on a slow > machine): but I've never found vi or emacs feel slow. You can't find fast enough machine to make eclipse fast. It is always slow. --Kim |