Why only 4.6MP?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Processing Program
Next: curanzia versicherung, berufsunf�higkeits versicherung, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung f�r selbst�ndige, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung preis, versicherung vergleich,
From: Mr. Strat on 24 Feb 2010 09:57 In article <MPG.25eee8cf5471cc2598c230(a)news.supernews.com>, Alfred Molon <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Current 4/3 cameras have 12MP and the 4.6MP of the Foveon should be on > the same level of a 7MP Bayer sensor camera, but not more than that. If > Foveon brought out a 10MP model they would be competitive. The bottom line is that Foveon is just crappy technology...unless you're fond of Homer Simpson skin tones.
From: Pete Stavrakoglou on 24 Feb 2010 11:39 "Mr. Strat" <rag(a)nospam.techline.com> wrote in message news:240220100657177312%rag(a)nospam.techline.com... > In article <MPG.25eee8cf5471cc2598c230(a)news.supernews.com>, Alfred > Molon <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Current 4/3 cameras have 12MP and the 4.6MP of the Foveon should be on >> the same level of a 7MP Bayer sensor camera, but not more than that. If >> Foveon brought out a 10MP model they would be competitive. > > The bottom line is that Foveon is just crappy technology...unless > you're fond of Homer Simpson skin tones. Randall, Randall, Randall that's old news that just doesn't apply anymore. The SD14, DP1, DP2 all produce fine skintones. I oughta know, I use an SD14.
From: nospam on 24 Feb 2010 11:49 In article <hm3knu$phe$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Pete Stavrakoglou <ntotrr(a)optonline.net> wrote: > > The bottom line is that Foveon is just crappy technology...unless > > you're fond of Homer Simpson skin tones. > > Randall, Randall, Randall that's old news that just doesn't apply anymore. > The SD14, DP1, DP2 all produce fine skintones. I oughta know, I use an > SD14. if you don't mind yellow or green, and i thought you had an olympus these days.
From: Pete Stavrakoglou on 24 Feb 2010 12:39 "nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:240220101149583968%nospam(a)nospam.invalid... > In article <hm3knu$phe$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Pete Stavrakoglou > <ntotrr(a)optonline.net> wrote: > >> > The bottom line is that Foveon is just crappy technology...unless >> > you're fond of Homer Simpson skin tones. >> >> Randall, Randall, Randall that's old news that just doesn't apply >> anymore. >> The SD14, DP1, DP2 all produce fine skintones. I oughta know, I use an >> SD14. > > if you don't mind yellow or green, and i thought you had an olympus > these days. I've got too many these days. I have the SD14 (have always used Sigma before others, including the SD9). I also have an Olympus E-510 and my wife bought me a Canon 7D for my 50th. Now that's a nice camera.
From: Rich on 24 Feb 2010 14:42
On Feb 24, 9:57 am, "Mr. Strat" <r...(a)nospam.techline.com> wrote: > In article <MPG.25eee8cf5471cc2598c...(a)news.supernews.com>, Alfred > > Molon <alfred_mo...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Current 4/3 cameras have 12MP and the 4.6MP of the Foveon should be on > > the same level of a 7MP Bayer sensor camera, but not more than that. If > > Foveon brought out a 10MP model they would be competitive. > > The bottom line is that Foveon is just crappy technology...unless > you're fond of Homer Simpson skin tones. That, and the colour seems to fade the higher up in ISO you go. |