Why only 4.6MP?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Processing Program
Next: curanzia versicherung, berufsunf�higkeits versicherung, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung f�r selbst�ndige, berufsunf�higkeitsversicherung preis, versicherung vergleich,
From: Rich on 25 Feb 2010 20:59 "Pete Stavrakoglou" <ntotrr(a)optonline.net> wrote in news:hm45tj$pjh$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > It's no secret that they are not good high-ISO cameras. That's where > the development has to be improved. The sensor development is still > in its infancy, there's a long way to go. On the bright side, fine art photo mags all seem to like the Sigma for black and white shooting.
From: Chris Malcolm on 25 Feb 2010 21:11 Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:53:50 -0500, nospam wrote: >> In article <d0880$4b86f110$546accd9$28086(a)cache80.multikabel.net>, >> Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote: >> >>> You completely misinterpreted their text, making your response as >>> worthless as everything else you post. >> >> so why don't you explain what they meant? or are your statements empty? > I will if it's requested by someone who is worth the trouble. But those > people are probably smart enough to manage without such an explanation. There must be a reason why you spend all your time talking to people who aren't worth talking to. Won't the others listen to you? -- Chris Malcolm
From: Alfred Molon on 26 Feb 2010 02:02 In article <250220101619430450%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam(a)nospam.invalid says... > and the eye can't see it, so it makes *no* difference if it's captured > or not. The human eye can see any detail if properly enlarged. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: David J Taylor on 26 Feb 2010 03:44 "Rich" <none(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:g4qdnY76XYONthrWnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... [] > On the bright side, fine art photo mags all seem to like the Sigma for > black and white shooting. > LOL! David
From: David J Taylor on 26 Feb 2010 03:45
"Alfred Molon" <alfred_molon(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:MPG.25f190835b8c693898c234(a)news.supernews.com... > In article <250220101619430450%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, > nospam(a)nospam.invalid says... >> and the eye can't see it, so it makes *no* difference if it's captured >> or not. > > The human eye can see any detail if properly enlarged. > -- > > Alfred Molon So do you want a camera to produce images, or one for pixel peeping? David |