Win US$5,000 by disproving these Martian blood cell fossils.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: angle-of-slant of superclusters and walls resembles magnetic filings slant Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #113; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Simple and direct proof that the theoretical science of AGW is fraud and the product of the host of charlatans led by J Hansen includingno discusion Wormley
From: dlzc on 27 May 2010 23:19 On May 27, 8:04 pm, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 5æ28æ¥, ä¸å12æ06å, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > On May 27, 1:27 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Win US$5,000 by disproving these Martian blood > > > cell fossils. > > > > The first person who can disprove the following > > > trace fossils of Martian blood cells will be paid > > > US$5,000 by me. > > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176855460&p=104 > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_rain_in_Kerala > > > Not all life has DNA.  Not all life is on Earth, or below the ozone > > layer.  Not everything that looks like red blood cells, is. > > > Disproved.  Send me my money. > > I did not understand how you had disproven that they > were trace fossils of Martian blood cells. They were the same red "blood" cells that are found above our own ozone layer. Nothing particularly "Martian" or "Terrestrial" about them. David A. Smith
From: Wretch Fossil on 30 May 2010 03:50 On 5æ27æ¥, ä¸å10æ02å, Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2010 01:27:54 -0700 (PDT), Wretch Fossil > > <wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >Win US$5,000 by disproving these Martian blood cell fossils. > > >The first person who can disprove the following trace fossils of > >Martian blood cells will be paid US$5,000 by me. > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176855460&p=104 > > You already owe me 10 000 $. > > w. You did not supply one generally accepted micrograph.
From: Wretch Fossil on 30 May 2010 03:57 On 5æ28æ¥, ä¸å11æ19å, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > On May 27, 8:04 pm, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 5æ28æ¥, ä¸å12æ06å, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > > On May 27, 1:27 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Win US$5,000 by disproving these Martian blood > > > > cell fossils. > > > > > The first person who can disprove the following > > > > trace fossils of Martian blood cells will be paid > > > > US$5,000 by me. > > > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176855460&p=104 > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_rain_in_Kerala > > > > Not all life has DNA.  Not all life is on Earth, or below the ozone > > > layer.  Not everything that looks like red blood cells, is. > > > > Disproved.  Send me my money. > > > I did not understand how you had disproven that they > > were trace fossils of Martian blood cells. > > They were the same red "blood" cells that are found above our own > ozone layer.  Nothing particularly "Martian" or "Terrestrial" about > them. > > David A. Smith- é±è被å¼ç¨æå - > > - 顯示被å¼ç¨æå - They were imaged from a thin section of a meteorite which originated from Mars. So, they were particular in that they were Martian.
From: dlzc on 30 May 2010 17:05 Dear Ed Conrad: On May 27, 8:04 pm, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 5æ28æ¥, ä¸å12æ06å, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > On May 27, 1:27 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Win US$5,000 by disproving these Martian blood > > > cell fossils. > > > > The first person who can disprove the following > > > trace fossils of Martian blood cells will be paid > > > US$5,000 by me. > > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176855460&p=104 > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_rain_in_Kerala > > > Not all life has DNA.  Not all life is on Earth, or > > below the ozone layer.  Not everything that looks > > like red blood cells, is. > > > Disproved.  Send me my money. > > I did not understand how you had disproven that they > were trace fossils of Martian blood cells. Panspermia is NOT "Martian". It is also NOT a red blood cell. So you are absolutely wrong about being red blood celsl. Pay up. David A. Smith
From: J. Clarke on 30 May 2010 20:18 On 5/30/2010 5:05 PM, dlzc wrote: > Dear Ed Conrad: > > On May 27, 8:04 pm, Wretch Fossil<wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5月28日, 上午12時06分, dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>> On May 27, 1:27 am, Wretch Fossil<wretchfos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Win US$5,000 by disproving these Martian blood >>>> cell fossils. >> >>>> The first person who can disprove the following >>>> trace fossils of Martian blood cells will be paid >>>> US$5,000 by me. >> >>>> http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176855460&p=104 >> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_rain_in_Kerala >> >>> Not all life has DNA. Not all life is on Earth, or >>> below the ozone layer. Not everything that looks >>> like red blood cells, is. >> >>> Disproved. Send me my money. >> >> I did not understand how you had disproven that they >> were trace fossils of Martian blood cells. > > Panspermia is NOT "Martian". It is also NOT a red blood cell. > > So you are absolutely wrong about being red blood celsl. Pay up. You don't understand the game. There is NO proof that he will accept that they are not red blood cells.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: angle-of-slant of superclusters and walls resembles magnetic filings slant Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #113; ATOM TOTALITY Next: Simple and direct proof that the theoretical science of AGW is fraud and the product of the host of charlatans led by J Hansen includingno discusion Wormley |