Wonderful!
in [Physics]
|
From: mpc755 on 3 Jan 2010 22:41 On Jan 3, 10:35 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > you must be confusing the standard textbook say-so > about water waves; > the water does not move in the forward direction of the wave, but > it sure does make a circular path (depending > upon the polarization of the wave, if any .-)... now, > why do you need to fluff that up with some aether-stuff, when > water is such an amazing substance? > Because it is not the H2O molecules that are physically the wave. The aether is contained (entrained) by the water molecules. It is actually the aether which is physically waving causing the H2O molecules to move. It is the connections between the H2O molecules (the matter) and the aether, which is causing the wave. 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter (the H2O molecules) and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the aether's state of displacement and entrainment. > > Because the water is not "waving". It is the aether contained within > > the H2O molecules which is doing the waving. > > > there is no vacuum for the red to shift in, although > > > Alfven had postulated that matter-antimatter annhialation > > > was the only possible source of energy to expand Universe -- > > --Brit's hate Shakespeare, Why?http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf > --Madame Rice is a Riceist, How?http://larouchepub.com/other/2009/3650rice_racist.html > --The Riemannian Space of the Nucleus, What?http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2009/Relativistic_Moon... > --In perpetuity clause in healthcare bill, Where?http://larouchepub.com/pr/2009/091229reid_exposed.html
From: spudnik on 3 Jan 2010 22:43 so, what is the index of refraction of aether?... we know what it is for "photons" in a "vacuum." > Should have been more specific. No propagation of light or waves. > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html --Brit's hate Shakespeare, Why? http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf --Madame Rice is a Riceist, How? http://larouchepub.com/other/2009/3650rice_racist.html --The Riemannian Space of the Nucleus, What? http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2009/Relativistic_Moon.pdf
From: spudnik on 3 Jan 2010 22:55 On Jan 3, 7:43 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > so, what is the index of refraction of aether?... we know what it is > for "photons" in a "vacuum." > > > Should have been more specific. No propagation of light or waves. > > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' > > http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > --Brit's hate Shakespeare, Why?http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf > --Madame Rice is a Riceist, How?http://larouchepub.com/other/2009/3650rice_racist.html > --The Riemannian Space of the Nucleus, What?http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2009/Relativistic_Moon...
From: spudnik on 3 Jan 2010 22:58 Albert's article said that there are no transverse waves in a fluid, neglecting light obviously. I just read that when (transverse) Alfven waves approach c, they become ordinary lightwaves. --Brit's hate Shakespeare, Why? http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf --Madame Rice is a Riceist, How? http://larouchepub.com/other/2009/3650rice_racist.html --The Riemannian Space of the Nucleus, What? http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2009/Relativistic_Moon.pdf
From: mpc755 on 3 Jan 2010 23:07
On Jan 3, 10:43 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > so, what is the index of refraction of aether?... we know what it is > for "photons" in a "vacuum." > The difference between using the term aether and vacuum when describing light is, light is not described as traveling at 'c' with respect to the vacuum. Light does travel at 'c' with respect to the aether. > > Should have been more specific. No propagation of light or waves. > > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' > > http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > --Brit's hate Shakespeare, Why?http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf > --Madame Rice is a Riceist, How?http://larouchepub.com/other/2009/3650rice_racist.html > --The Riemannian Space of the Nucleus, What?http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2009/Relativistic_Moon... |