Would magn. pole reversal actually mess up electronic equipment?
in [Design]
|
Prev: Integrated AGC 100kHz-10MHz
Next: Piezo Amplifier
From: Capt. Cave Man on 3 Jan 2010 10:11 On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:10:45 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >Of course, that just begs the question of what it means to say that an >object has a velocity without specifying what it's relative to. The speed at which the electrons and electro-chemical interactions between your neurons could safely be argued to be without motion. Everything else is moving. Known fact. Sorry.
From: Capt. Cave Man on 3 Jan 2010 10:14 On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:10:45 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >But the proper conclusion is that it's not sensible to talk about things >moving through space other than in the most informal terms. The velocity graph on the site differs with your claim. So does every mass in existence since they came into existence after the big bang initiated. It is ALL moving. Alas, even your frozen crude oil flow rate velocity neurons are.
From: Capt. Cave Man on 3 Jan 2010 10:58 On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 07:31:18 -0800 (PST), MooseFET <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote: >You are correct that the motions are relative to other bodies and not >relative to some >mythical fixed frame of reference in space. You're an idiot. It is proven, and we even named telescopes after the guy, you stupid twit. _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_flow
From: BobW on 3 Jan 2010 11:52 "Sylvia Else" <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote in message news:001f93c1$0$25192$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... >> >> You simply cannot grasp the concept that open space is what everything >> in it moves through. > > Does everything? How can you tell whether something is moving? > > You talked about a given velocity. Since velocities are always relative, > your "given velocity" must be relative to something. But you have yet to > say what. > > Sylvia. Sylvia, You are wasting your time with this no-it-nothing. Maybe this will clear it up for him, but more likely not: ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES By A. Einstein June 30, 1905 .... Examples of this sort, together with the unsuccessful attempts to discover any motion of the earth relatively to the ``light medium,'' suggest that the phenomena of electrodynamics as well as of mechanics possess no properties corresponding to the idea of absolute rest. .... Bob -- == All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==
From: Michael A. Terrell on 3 Jan 2010 16:45
krw wrote: > > On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:59:00 -0800, UltimatePatriot > <UltimatePatriot(a)thebestcountry.org> wrote: > > >On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:52:01 -0600, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > > > >>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:34:58 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" > >><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>>krw wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:38:52 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" > >>>> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> >krw wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:31:30 -0800, Archimedes' Lever > >>>> >> <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> >On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:48:11 -0500, Rich Webb > >>>> >> ><bbew.ar(a)mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote: > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> >> in the groups that I > >>>> >> >>follow, he has used (in descending order of frequency): > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > Sounds like a case for stalking to me. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> One can't avoid crossing your path, DimBulb. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > You sure you want to tread down this path, little boy? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Yes. File a complaint, AlwaysWrong. This should be a real > >>>> >> knee-slapper! What a blowhard, DimBulb. > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > Why not. He blows everything else. > >>>> > >>>> Fairies do. > >>> > >>> > >>> It's rare to find a fairy so rude. Or Stupid. Must be an Obama > >>>loving Democrat. > >> > >>Aren't they all? > > > > You must be talking about each other. > > No, AlwaysWrong, we're talking about the fairy DimBulb. I wouldn't > expect you to comprehend the thread, though. > > > I am not a fairy, and I voted for McCain. > > You lust after McCain too? Seek help! More proof. He left out Palin. If he wasn't a farit he would have mentioned the woman on the ticket. > > You are obviously oblivious to all the posts that I made where I > >expressed my opinion about the Obama retard's character as well. > > > *I* remember a BOMBER, and I was the same age as he. Maybe his mommy, > >who could afford to send him to Harvard, could not afford a television > >set. > > > > Alas, the net result of your post is that you both show the group that > >The Trinity of Immaturity Cubed never ceases to post their immature > >horseshit into these groups on a daily basis. > > You could leave, fairy DimBulb. Or just step in front of a bus. -- Greed is the root of all eBay. |