Would magn. pole reversal actually mess up electronic equipment?
in [Design]
|
Prev: Integrated AGC 100kHz-10MHz
Next: Piezo Amplifier
From: Sylvia Else on 3 Jan 2010 17:57 Capt. Cave Man wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:10:45 +1100, Sylvia Else > <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: > >> But the proper conclusion is that it's not sensible to talk about things >> moving through space other than in the most informal terms. > > The velocity graph on the site differs with your claim. > > So does every mass in existence since they came into existence > after the big bang initiated. It is ALL moving. > > Alas, even your frozen crude oil flow rate velocity neurons are. Are you saying that the local space is that space that moves with the common velocity relative to the Hubble flow? Sylvia
From: Sylvia Else on 3 Jan 2010 17:57 Capt. Cave Man wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 07:31:18 -0800 (PST), MooseFET <kensmith(a)rahul.net> > wrote: > >> You are correct that the motions are relative to other bodies and not >> relative to some >> mythical fixed frame of reference in space. > > > You're an idiot. > > It is proven, and we even named telescopes after the guy, you stupid > twit. > > _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_flow Are you saying that the local space is that space that moves with the common velocity relative to the Hubble flow? Sylvia
From: Capt. Cave Man on 3 Jan 2010 18:07 On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:57:01 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >Capt. Cave Man wrote: >> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:10:45 +1100, Sylvia Else >> <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >> >>> But the proper conclusion is that it's not sensible to talk about things >>> moving through space other than in the most informal terms. >> >> The velocity graph on the site differs with your claim. >> >> So does every mass in existence since they came into existence >> after the big bang initiated. It is ALL moving. >> >> Alas, even your frozen crude oil flow rate velocity neurons are. > >Are you saying that the local space is that space that moves with the >common velocity relative to the Hubble flow? > >Sylvia Sorry, ditz, but you will no longer troll me.
From: Sylvia Else on 3 Jan 2010 18:38 Capt. Cave Man wrote: > On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:57:01 +1100, Sylvia Else > <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: > >> Capt. Cave Man wrote: >>> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:10:45 +1100, Sylvia Else >>> <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >>> >>>> But the proper conclusion is that it's not sensible to talk about things >>>> moving through space other than in the most informal terms. >>> The velocity graph on the site differs with your claim. >>> >>> So does every mass in existence since they came into existence >>> after the big bang initiated. It is ALL moving. >>> >>> Alas, even your frozen crude oil flow rate velocity neurons are. >> Are you saying that the local space is that space that moves with the >> common velocity relative to the Hubble flow? >> >> Sylvia > > > Sorry, ditz, but you will no longer troll me. You mean you've looked back at your postings, and realised that you're in a hole whether you say "yes" or "no". Sylvia.
From: Capt. Cave Man on 3 Jan 2010 19:38
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:38:27 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >Capt. Cave Man wrote: >> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:57:01 +1100, Sylvia Else >> <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >> >>> Capt. Cave Man wrote: >>>> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:10:45 +1100, Sylvia Else >>>> <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >>>> >>>>> But the proper conclusion is that it's not sensible to talk about things >>>>> moving through space other than in the most informal terms. >>>> The velocity graph on the site differs with your claim. >>>> >>>> So does every mass in existence since they came into existence >>>> after the big bang initiated. It is ALL moving. >>>> >>>> Alas, even your frozen crude oil flow rate velocity neurons are. >>> Are you saying that the local space is that space that moves with the >>> common velocity relative to the Hubble flow? >>> >>> Sylvia >> >> >> Sorry, ditz, but you will no longer troll me. > >You mean you've looked back at your postings, and realised that you're >in a hole whether you say "yes" or "no". > >Sylvia. This from the ditz that stated that "space moves"? Any cave man knows better than that. Bwuahahahahahahahaha! I thought you were trolling, but now I see that you really are nothing but bone between the ears. |