Would magn. pole reversal actually mess up electronic equipment?
in [Design]
|
Prev: Integrated AGC 100kHz-10MHz
Next: Piezo Amplifier
From: Archimedes' Lever on 1 Jan 2010 09:13 On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:36:18 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: >Objects at different distances from the centre of the galaxy will have >different orbital periods. I suggest that you retake any course you may have been present at. The objects at different distances will have different velocities with respect to local space. On the whole, the entire galaxy rotates at the same rotational (orbital) period. Otherwise, the arms of the galaxy would disperse or collide. All observations of ours and other galaxies indicate that they all rotate TOGETHER. You guys should watch the discovery channel or other such program to re-bolster anything that you may have glanced over in your formative years. Yes, it was obviously just a glance, or you would have retained more of the facts.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 1 Jan 2010 15:31 On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:48:11 -0500, Rich Webb <bbew.ar(a)mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote: > in the groups that I >follow, he has used (in descending order of frequency): Sounds like a case for stalking to me. You sure you want to tread down this path, little boy?
From: krw on 1 Jan 2010 15:49 On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:31:30 -0800, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:48:11 -0500, Rich Webb ><bbew.ar(a)mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote: > >> in the groups that I >>follow, he has used (in descending order of frequency): > > > Sounds like a case for stalking to me. One can't avoid crossing your path, DimBulb. > You sure you want to tread down this path, little boy? Yes. File a complaint, AlwaysWrong. This should be a real knee-slapper! What a blowhard, DimBulb.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 1 Jan 2010 17:38 krw wrote: > > On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:31:30 -0800, Archimedes' Lever > <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: > > >On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:48:11 -0500, Rich Webb > ><bbew.ar(a)mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote: > > > >> in the groups that I > >>follow, he has used (in descending order of frequency): > > > > > > Sounds like a case for stalking to me. > > One can't avoid crossing your path, DimBulb. > > > You sure you want to tread down this path, little boy? > > Yes. File a complaint, AlwaysWrong. This should be a real > knee-slapper! What a blowhard, DimBulb. Why not. He blows everything else. -- Greed is the root of all eBay.
From: Sylvia Else on 1 Jan 2010 19:20
Archimedes' Lever wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:36:18 +1100, Sylvia Else > <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: > >> Objects at different distances from the centre of the galaxy will have >> different orbital periods. > > > I suggest that you retake any course you may have been present at. > > The objects at different distances will have different velocities with > respect to local space. "Local space" has a velocity? On the whole, the entire galaxy rotates at the > same rotational (orbital) period. > > Otherwise, the arms of the galaxy would disperse or collide. Depends what the arms are. They may be shock waves, or something like that. But I rather suspect now that you're delibrately arguing a position that you know very well is untenable. Sylvia. |