Prev: SBS 2008 Backup-Fails with Creation of the shared protection point
Next: CTIW Fails When Looking for Router
From: Dave on 1 Dec 2009 11:11 It is coming from the vendor's email server I don't know if they have an SPF record, don't know what that is we use trend micro for anti-spam, and it's not blocking that email address or domain, we receive emails from our vendors domain all the time. if they send the report to my hotmail or comcast account I get it. -- Dave "Ace Fekay [MCT]" wrote: > "Dave" <Dave(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:6971102F-C70D-47B4-8271-0F770C42B202(a)microsoft.com... > > The email is coming from a vendor's server via web > > it shows up on my hotmail or comcast email addresses but not my company > > email account > > Vendor's employees can email us the report attached and we get them, > > suppose > > to be done automatically > > it is a different domain name than ours > > Don't know what IMF is > > we're not using POP3 > > > > -- > > Dave > > Just to understand it fully, you are saying (referencing your response to > Larry), that the FROM address on the email from the vendor, is not your own > domain name that your server normally receives mail on? > > In otherwords: > > 1. Your domain name is (example) yourdomain.com. > > 2. The vendor's email is vendordomain.com > > 3. Your report generator at your location sends an email to the vendor, such > as to: vendorReports(a)vendordomain.com > > 4. The vendor then sends you an email to dave(a)yourdomain.com, and the from > address is vendorReports(a)vendordomain.com > > Is that correct? > > Is the mail coming from the vendor coming from somewhere else other than the > vendor's mail server (such as from their web server)? > Does the vendor's mailoes the vendor's domain name (vendordomain.com) have > an SPF record? > If so, is there an entry in their SPF record for their Sending email Server > on vendordomain.com? > If so, is there an entry for the web server (or whatever server it's > originating from) in the SPF record? > > The IMF is the Intelligent Mail Filter. That's Exchange's spam filter. > > Are you using a 3rd party spam filter? > > Ace > > > > . >
From: Dave on 1 Dec 2009 11:14 the article Robbin Meng had a link to -- Dave "Ace Fekay [MCT]" wrote: > "Dave" <Dave(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:2F3A50E2-90B9-426E-8BFD-D9EDE3077B6E(a)microsoft.com... > > Okay, > > ran the smtp inbound test, see below: > > > > Testing Inbound SMTP Mail flow for domain payroll(a)qqest.com > > Inbound SMTP mail flow was verified successfully. > > Test Steps > > Attempting to retrieve DNS MX records for domain qqest.com > > Successfully retrieved one or more MX records from DNS > > Additional Details > > MX Records Host mail.qqest.com, Preference 1 > > > > > > Testing Mail Exchanger mail.qqest.com. > > This Mail Exchanger was tested successfully. > > Test Steps > > Attempting to resolve the host name mail.qqest.com in DNS. > > Host successfully resolved > > Additional Details > > IP(s) returned: 67.137.30.226 > > > > Testing TCP Port 25 on host mail.qqest.com to ensure it is listening and > > open. > > The port was opened successfully. > > Additional Details > > Banner Received: 220 barracuda.qqest.com ESMTP > > (3869784aaaa24f32f8070d56dce0275b) > > > > Attempting to send test email message to payroll(a)qqest.com using MX > > mail.qqest.com. > > The test message was delivered successfully. > > Testing the MX mail.qqest.com for open relay by trying to relay to user > > Admin(a)TestExchangeConnectivity.com > > Open Relay test passed. This mx is not an open relay > > Additional Details > > > > didn't understand the article > > > > Dave, > > Which article? > > Ace > > > > . >
From: Dave on 1 Dec 2009 11:19 Yes the mail is not received at our mail server yes it successfully sends email to my hotmail where do I look on exchange to find that rejects that specific email address, we get all other emails send from the same vendor trend is NOT blocking that address How do I view a header message? I don't know of any blocks in place or where they are located at, or how to disable them -- Dave "Larry Struckmeyer[SBS-MVP]" wrote: > Hi Dave: > > It would seem that you are testing the mail server at qqest.com, which I > would expect to be a valid mail server. But their ability to receive mail > should not be an issue here. What seems to be an issue, and please correct > me if I misunderstand, is that a message generated by the qqest.com payroll > calculator is not received at your mail server. > > Yes? No? > > You did say that the program at qqest.com does successfully send the message > to your hotmail address, but not to your exchange server. that means that > it is being rejected by your anti spam or anti content filters as it enters > the exchange server. > > What I would do is look carefully at the message headers for a successful > message that lands in any inbox to see what the originating mail server is. > Then, depending on the results, create an exception in the various blocks > you have in place, or temporarily disable them to see if the message can > get to your exchange server mailbox. > > You might also be able to use message tracking to see where it is stopped > from entering your server. > > A workaround might be to have the message sent to a mailbox used only for > this purpose on hotmail, Gmail, msnmail. any mail that will receive it, then > have that forwarded to your exchange server mailbox. this should have the > effect of a message coming from the intermediate mailbox, not the originating > one. > > - > Larry > Please post the resolution to your > issue so others may benefit > - > Get Your SBS Health Check at > www.sbsbpa.com > > > > "Dave" <Dave(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:2F3A50E2-90B9-426E-8BFD-D9EDE3077B6E(a)microsoft.com... > > > >> Okay, > >> ran the smtp inbound test, see below: > >> Testing Inbound SMTP Mail flow for domain payroll(a)qqest.com > >> Inbound SMTP mail flow was verified successfully. > >> Test Steps > >> Attempting to retrieve DNS MX records for domain qqest.com > >> Successfully retrieved one or more MX records from DNS > >> Additional Details > >> MX Records Host mail.qqest.com, Preference 1 > >> Testing Mail Exchanger mail.qqest.com. > >> This Mail Exchanger was tested successfully. > >> Test Steps > >> Attempting to resolve the host name mail.qqest.com in DNS. > >> Host successfully resolved > >> Additional Details > >> IP(s) returned: 67.137.30.226 > >> Testing TCP Port 25 on host mail.qqest.com to ensure it is listening > >> and > >> open. > >> The port was opened successfully. > >> Additional Details > >> Banner Received: 220 barracuda.qqest.com ESMTP > >> (3869784aaaa24f32f8070d56dce0275b) > >> Attempting to send test email message to payroll(a)qqest.com using MX > >> mail.qqest.com. > >> The test message was delivered successfully. > >> Testing the MX mail.qqest.com for open relay by trying to relay to > >> user > >> Admin(a)TestExchangeConnectivity.com > >> Open Relay test passed. This mx is not an open relay > >> Additional Details > >> didn't understand the article > >> > > Dave, > > > > Which article? > > > > Ace > > > > > . >
From: Dave on 1 Dec 2009 11:21 how do I find SPF so I need to enable SenderID filtering? where do I find that at -- Dave ""Robbin Meng [MSFT]"" wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for you update. > > Based on the current situation, if you can receive regular emails from the vendor mail server except the automatically sent report mail, then I agree with Larry and Ace that it is > probably caused by your Exchange server that may be the IMF or other 3rd party spam filter block/reject the report email that from an automatic sent email address(which might > not exist and no mailbox at all) of the vendor mail system. > > Basically, to verify a legitimate sender, your Exchange server checks for the sending domain's SPF (Sender Policy Framework) record, which is published in the DNS record. > The mail server then determines whether the sending e-mail server's IP address matches the IP address that is published in the DNS record. SenderID and SPF are not equal, > but enabling SenderID filtering will make your Exchange check sender's SPF records. > > New Weapons In The Fight Against Spam > http://207.46.16.252/en-us/magazine/2006.01.newweapons.aspx > > > More information about IMF: > > Microsoft Exchange Server Intelligent Message Filter v2 Operations Guide > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996624(EXCHG.65).aspx > > Hope this helps. > > > > > Best regards, > Robbin Meng(MSFT) > Microsoft Online Newsgroup Support > > > . >
From: Dave on 1 Dec 2009 11:28 reading the New Weapons in the fight against spam link Do I enter the internal or external ip address of the exchange server? -- Dave ""Robbin Meng [MSFT]"" wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for you update. > > Based on the current situation, if you can receive regular emails from the vendor mail server except the automatically sent report mail, then I agree with Larry and Ace that it is > probably caused by your Exchange server that may be the IMF or other 3rd party spam filter block/reject the report email that from an automatic sent email address(which might > not exist and no mailbox at all) of the vendor mail system. > > Basically, to verify a legitimate sender, your Exchange server checks for the sending domain's SPF (Sender Policy Framework) record, which is published in the DNS record. > The mail server then determines whether the sending e-mail server's IP address matches the IP address that is published in the DNS record. SenderID and SPF are not equal, > but enabling SenderID filtering will make your Exchange check sender's SPF records. > > New Weapons In The Fight Against Spam > http://207.46.16.252/en-us/magazine/2006.01.newweapons.aspx > > > More information about IMF: > > Microsoft Exchange Server Intelligent Message Filter v2 Operations Guide > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996624(EXCHG.65).aspx > > Hope this helps. > > > > > Best regards, > Robbin Meng(MSFT) > Microsoft Online Newsgroup Support > > > . >
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: SBS 2008 Backup-Fails with Creation of the shared protection point Next: CTIW Fails When Looking for Router |