From: Desertphile on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:46:13 -0400, "Painius"
<starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:

> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> news:ots416l3bs7gkvmjqu7bhi7ubdmrqrriib(a)4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:08:02 -0400, "Painius"
> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote...
> >> in message news:ovq4169pq2q6irbe4jvr53nd3hsl40h6rr(a)4ax.com...
> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
> >> > <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of mankind.
> >> >> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians crossed the
> >> >> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during most of
> >> >> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it? Did over
> >> >> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I rather
> >> >> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.
> >
> >> > Idiot.
> >
> >> Since what DA wrote is precisely true
> >
> > No.
>
> Well, since you're not being specific, we can assume that
> it's all untrue? So, there was never a land bridge across
> the Bering strait that is now covered due to rising seas?
> and the ancestors of Native Americans never crossed that
> land bridge from Asia into N. America? And humans had
> something to do with rising seas, to include the hunting of
> wooly mammoths? And natural cycles don't run their
> courses?

You asked the question "But during most of that time of rising
seas, what it humans have to do with it?" That means you are an
idiot.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Painius on
"Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:tnv416lhpqdd4qdt34m18u2bjgduo2rr01(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:46:13 -0400, "Painius"
> <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
>
>> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
>> news:ots416l3bs7gkvmjqu7bhi7ubdmrqrriib(a)4ax.com...
>> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:08:02 -0400, "Painius"
>> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote...
>> >> in message news:ovq4169pq2q6irbe4jvr53nd3hsl40h6rr(a)4ax.com...
>> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
>> >> > <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of
>> >> >> mankind.
>> >> >> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians crossed
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during most
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it? Did
>> >> >> over
>> >> >> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I rather
>> >> >> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.
>> >
>> >> > Idiot.
>> >
>> >> Since what DA wrote is precisely true
>> >
>> > No.
>>
>> Well, since you're not being specific, we can assume that
>> it's all untrue? So, there was never a land bridge across
>> the Bering strait that is now covered due to rising seas?
>> and the ancestors of Native Americans never crossed that
>> land bridge from Asia into N. America? And humans had
>> something to do with rising seas, to include the hunting of
>> wooly mammoths? And natural cycles don't run their
>> courses?
>
> You asked the question "But during most of that time of rising
> seas, what it humans have to do with it?" That means you are an
> idiot.

Okay, so you say that it's all true *except* the part
about humans having something to do with the rising
seas. Keep in mind that the initial post where the
professor was saying truthfully that the study and the
reporting of human's causing global warming can be
considered as "unscientific". You, however, seem to
think that it's all true. You appear to believe that
humans have had something to do with rising seas
and global warming during most of that time that seas
have been rising. Can you cite evidence for this belief?

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S. "In my experience, there is only one motivation,
and that is desire. No reasons or principle
contain it or stand against it."
> Jane Smiley
Pulitzer Prize-winning American novelist

P.P.S.: http://www.painellsworth.net
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth


From: Desertphile on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:34:55 -0400, "Painius"
<starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:

> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> news:tnv416lhpqdd4qdt34m18u2bjgduo2rr01(a)4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:46:13 -0400, "Painius"
> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> >> news:ots416l3bs7gkvmjqu7bhi7ubdmrqrriib(a)4ax.com...
> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:08:02 -0400, "Painius"
> >> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote...
> >> >> in message news:ovq4169pq2q6irbe4jvr53nd3hsl40h6rr(a)4ax.com...
> >> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
> >> >> > <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of
> >> >> >> mankind.
> >> >> >> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians crossed
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during most
> >> >> >> of
> >> >> >> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it? Did
> >> >> >> over
> >> >> >> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I rather
> >> >> >> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.
> >> >
> >> >> > Idiot.
> >> >
> >> >> Since what DA wrote is precisely true
> >> >
> >> > No.
> >>
> >> Well, since you're not being specific, we can assume that
> >> it's all untrue? So, there was never a land bridge across
> >> the Bering strait that is now covered due to rising seas?
> >> and the ancestors of Native Americans never crossed that
> >> land bridge from Asia into N. America? And humans had
> >> something to do with rising seas, to include the hunting of
> >> wooly mammoths? And natural cycles don't run their
> >> courses?
> >
> > You asked the question "But during most of that time of rising
> > seas, what it humans have to do with it?" That means you are an
> > idiot.

> Okay, so you say that it's all true *except* the part
> about humans having something to do with the rising
> seas.

Idiot.

> Keep in mind that the initial post where the
> professor was saying truthfully that the study and the
> reporting of human's causing global warming can be
> considered as "unscientific".

Yes; he's an idiot.

> You, however, seem to
> think that it's all true. You appear to believe that
> humans have had something to do with rising seas
> and global warming during most of that time that seas
> have been rising.

Idiot.

> Can you cite evidence for this belief?
>
> happy days and...
> starry starry nights!


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Desertphile on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT), Benj
<bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote:

> On Jun 11, 2:47�pm, Desertphile <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net>
> wrote:
>
> > > Okay, so you say that it's all true *except* the part
> > > about humans having something to do with the rising
> > > seas.
> >
> > Idiot.
> >
> > > Keep in mind that the initial post where the
> > > professor was saying truthfully that the study and the
> > > reporting of human's causing global warming can be
> > > considered as "unscientific".

> > Yes; he's an idiot.

> So your total contribution here to the "scientific method" is simply
> to call everyone an idiot?

Nope! Only the idiots. There is no known mechanism by which humans
could have caused the ice land bridge crossing the Bering Straight
to melt.

> Since:
> He found that the climate establishment
> does not follow the scientific method.

No, he did not "find" that. It is not true.

> Instead, it �seems overall to
> comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined
> policy preference.�

No, scientists have not engaged in a multigenerational conspiracy
against you.

> That his determination was that the so-called "climate establishment"
> was engaged in POLITICS rather than science, I'd call that an
> insightful, cogent analysis of the current situation.

Yes, he lied.

> So that makes you... Wait for it ... AN IDIOT!

No, the idiots are the liars who believe scientists are evil
fiends out to take over the planet. I.e., you alarmist nutcases.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Painius on
"Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:k11516lcf8dbluaciqprtoi6mcsljuhjb0(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:34:55 -0400, "Painius"
> <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
>> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
>> news:tnv416lhpqdd4qdt34m18u2bjgduo2rr01(a)4ax.com...
>> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:46:13 -0400, "Painius"
>> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
>> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:ots416l3bs7gkvmjqu7bhi7ubdmrqrriib(a)4ax.com...
>> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:08:02 -0400, "Painius"
>> >> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
>> >> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote...
>> >> >> in message news:ovq4169pq2q6irbe4jvr53nd3hsl40h6rr(a)4ax.com...
>> >> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
>> >> >> > <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of
>> >> >> >> mankind.
>> >> >> >> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians
>> >> >> >> crossed
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during
>> >> >> >> most
>> >> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it?
>> >> >> >> Did
>> >> >> >> over
>> >> >> >> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I
>> >> >> >> rather
>> >> >> >> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.
>> >> >
>> >> >> > Idiot.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Since what DA wrote is precisely true
>> >> >
>> >> > No.
>> >>
>> >> Well, since you're not being specific, we can assume that
>> >> it's all untrue? So, there was never a land bridge across
>> >> the Bering strait that is now covered due to rising seas?
>> >> and the ancestors of Native Americans never crossed that
>> >> land bridge from Asia into N. America? And humans had
>> >> something to do with rising seas, to include the hunting of
>> >> wooly mammoths? And natural cycles don't run their
>> >> courses?
>> >
>> > You asked the question "But during most of that time of rising
>> > seas, what it humans have to do with it?" That means you are an
>> > idiot.
>
>> Okay, so you say that it's all true *except* the part
>> about humans having something to do with the rising
>> seas.
>
> Idiot.
>
>> Keep in mind that the initial post where the
>> professor was saying truthfully that the study and the
>> reporting of human's causing global warming can be
>> considered as "unscientific".
>
> Yes; he's an idiot.
>
>> You, however, seem to
>> think that it's all true. You appear to believe that
>> humans have had something to do with rising seas
>> and global warming during most of that time that seas
>> have been rising.
>
> Idiot.
>
>> Can you cite evidence for this belief?


If you cannot cite evidence, does that make you an
imbecile?

You mentioned to Benj that...

"There is no known mechanism by which humans
could have caused the ice land bridge crossing the
Bering Straight to melt."

How is this different than what the professor and DA
wrote? I think you need to develop your reading
comprehension and people skills. Without them,
you're just another slug who will be consistently
killfiled or ignored. Myself? I shall just ignore you
for a while. Ta.

Oh here, let me help you with your obvious response...

>>> Idiot.

Jerk.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S.: "Personally I'm always ready to learn,
although I do not always like being taught."
> Winston Churchill

P.P.S.: http://www.painellsworth.net
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth