From: Leon on
Legal verdict: Manmade global warming science doesn’t withstand
scrutiny

By Lawrence Solomon June 6, 2010 – 10:47 pm

A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the
University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has
concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming
proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny.

The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor
and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the
University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that “on virtually every
major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN’s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work
by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various
rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize
what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even
disagreements.”

Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global
warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC
publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment
scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited
climate science literature. He found that the climate establishment
does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to
comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined
policy preference.”

The 79-page document, which effectively eviscerates the case for man-
made global warming, can be found here,
http://www.probeinternational.org/UPennCross.pdf

Financial Post
LawrenceSolomon(a)nextcity.com
Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe the author of
The Deniers.
From: Desertphile on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
<double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:

> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of mankind.
> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians crossed the
> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during most of
> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it? Did over
> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I rather
> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.

Idiot.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Painius on
"Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote...
in message news:ovq4169pq2q6irbe4jvr53nd3hsl40h6rr(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
> <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:
>
>> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of mankind.
>> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians crossed the
>> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during most of
>> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it? Did over
>> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I rather
>> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.
>
> Idiot.

Since what DA wrote is precisely true, what does
calling him an idiot make you? A much bigger idiot?

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S. "In my experience, there is only one motivation,
and that is desire. No reasons or principle
contain it or stand against it."
> Jane Smiley
Pulitzer Prize-winning American novelist

P.P.S.: http://www.painellsworth.net
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth


From: Desertphile on
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:08:02 -0400, "Painius"
<starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:

> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote...
> in message news:ovq4169pq2q6irbe4jvr53nd3hsl40h6rr(a)4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
> > <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:

> >> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of mankind.
> >> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians crossed the
> >> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during most of
> >> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it? Did over
> >> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I rather
> >> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.

> > Idiot.

> Since what DA wrote is precisely true

No.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Painius on
"Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:ots416l3bs7gkvmjqu7bhi7ubdmrqrriib(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:08:02 -0400, "Painius"
> <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
>
>> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote...
>> in message news:ovq4169pq2q6irbe4jvr53nd3hsl40h6rr(a)4ax.com...
>> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
>> > <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:
>
>> >> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of mankind.
>> >> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians crossed the
>> >> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during most of
>> >> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it? Did over
>> >> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I rather
>> >> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.
>
>> > Idiot.
>
>> Since what DA wrote is precisely true
>
> No.

Well, since you're not being specific, we can assume that
it's all untrue? So, there was never a land bridge across
the Bering strait that is now covered due to rising seas?
and the ancestors of Native Americans never crossed that
land bridge from Asia into N. America? And humans had
something to do with rising seas, to include the hunting of
wooly mammoths? And natural cycles don't run their
courses?

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S. "In my experience, there is only one motivation,
and that is desire. No reasons or principle
contain it or stand against it."
> Jane Smiley
Pulitzer Prize-winning American novelist

P.P.S.: http://www.painellsworth.net
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth