Prev: Synthetic Life Becomes Reality
Next: New Experiments Rattle Space Weather Research
From: Desertphile on 11 Jun 2010 19:07
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:58:04 -0400, "Painius"
<starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:

> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> news:k11516lcf8dbluaciqprtoi6mcsljuhjb0(a)4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:34:55 -0400, "Painius"
> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> >> news:tnv416lhpqdd4qdt34m18u2bjgduo2rr01(a)4ax.com...
> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:46:13 -0400, "Painius"
> >> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
> >> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> >> >> news:ots416l3bs7gkvmjqu7bhi7ubdmrqrriib(a)4ax.com...
> >> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:08:02 -0400, "Painius"
> >> >> > <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> "Desertphile" <desertphile(a)invalid-address.net> wrote...
> >> >> >> in message news:ovq4169pq2q6irbe4jvr53nd3hsl40h6rr(a)4ax.com...
> >> >> >> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
> >> >> >> > <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Certainly sea levels have risen a lot during the history of
> >> >> >> >> mankind.
> >> >> >> >> Obviously seas were a lot lower when the American Indians
> >> >> >> >> crossed
> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> Bering land bridge from Asia into North America. But during
> >> >> >> >> most
> >> >> >> >> of
> >> >> >> >> that time of rising seas, what it humans have to do with it?
> >> >> >> >> Did
> >> >> >> >> over
> >> >> >> >> hunting the woolly mammoth have something to do with it? I
> >> >> >> >> rather
> >> >> >> >> doubt it. But natural cycles run their courses.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Idiot.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Since what DA wrote is precisely true
> >> >> >
> >> >> > No.
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, since you're not being specific, we can assume that
> >> >> it's all untrue? So, there was never a land bridge across
> >> >> the Bering strait that is now covered due to rising seas?
> >> >> and the ancestors of Native Americans never crossed that
> >> >> land bridge from Asia into N. America? And humans had
> >> >> something to do with rising seas, to include the hunting of
> >> >> wooly mammoths? And natural cycles don't run their
> >> >> courses?
> >> >
> >> > You asked the question "But during most of that time of rising
> >> > seas, what it humans have to do with it?" That means you are an
> >> > idiot.
> >
> >> Okay, so you say that it's all true *except* the part
> >> about humans having something to do with the rising
> >> seas.
> >
> > Idiot.
> >
> >> Keep in mind that the initial post where the
> >> professor was saying truthfully that the study and the
> >> reporting of human's causing global warming can be
> >> considered as "unscientific".
> >
> > Yes; he's an idiot.
> >
> >> You, however, seem to
> >> think that it's all true. You appear to believe that
> >> humans have had something to do with rising seas
> >> and global warming during most of that time that seas
> >> have been rising.
> >
> > Idiot.
> >
> >> Can you cite evidence for this belief?

> If you cannot cite evidence, does that make you an imbecile?

Why would I wish to cite evidence for something I did not claim?

Idiot.

> You mentioned to Benj that...
>
> "There is no known mechanism by which humans
> could have caused the ice land bridge crossing the
> Bering Straight to melt."

Correct. If you know of such a mechanism, share it with the world.

> How is this different than what the professor and DA
> wrote?

ExxonMobil paid the economics clown $10,000 for the article. They
will pay you that also: they said so. The economics writer does
not believe what he wrote, and his opinions hold no weight among
scientists.

> I think you need to develop your reading
> comprehension and people skills. Without them,

Read the propaganda again, idiot.

> you're just another slug who will be consistently
> killfiled or ignored. Myself? I shall just ignore you
> for a while. Ta.

Why don't you spend some time educating yourself onthe subject?

An economosts opinions regarding all of the worlds' scientists not
being scientists is just asinine. His opinions do not matter.

Idiot.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Desertphile on 11 Jun 2010 22:23
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:15:31 -0700 (PDT), Terrys
<merryterrys(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jun 12, 8:56�am, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde...(a)dirtcheap.net> wrote:
> > "Desertphile" <desertph...(a)invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> >
> > news:sdg516to2uc9m6khpsrd9tlikk07ui88lk(a)4ax.com...
> >
> > > There is no mechanism by which humans melted the Bering Straight
> > > land bridge thousands of years ago, idiot.
> >
> > Okay, since I am now an idiot, when did I ever state that "humans" melted
> > the, well, I'd call it...ICE BRIDGE...of the Bering Straight?

> Strawman - He never said you did.
> All that needs to be pointed out is one word - "Economist" - the only
> `science' with a consistent record of failure, whose main `mechanism'
> appears to be trying to adjust populations to fit their models.
> Only in a universe where Tony Blair could be marketed as an peace-
> maker.....

In this case the economost was paid $10,000 by ExxonMobil for the
article, writing his opinion that the world's entire population of
physicists, climatologists, chemists, paleontologists, etc. (i.e.,
scientists who observe global warming has happened, is happing,
and will continue to happen) "are not doing science." FUNNY!


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Desertphile on 12 Jun 2010 11:08
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:54:53 -0700 (PDT), bert
<herbertglazier79(a)msn.com> wrote:

*CUTS*

> Best to ask the people in Holland about high tides. They in reality
> deal with it TreBert

Bali has it even worse, and they are officially pissed off at the
IPCC for their latest report being too conservative. Bali thought
they had 60 years or so to move inland, and now it looks more like
they have 30 years or less if they want to mitigate the damage due
to global climate change. Much of their infrastructure, like
California, is on the coast.

I see that California is also planning on flood mitigation, and
they are already raising sea walls due to the rise in the Pacific
Ocean's height.

Meanwhile, FOX "News" and the Bush2 Regime insists it isn't
happening.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
From: Desertphile on 12 Jun 2010 11:12
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:04:55 -0700 (PDT), bert
<herbertglazier79(a)msn.com> wrote:

*CUTS*

> This Florida weekend will break all heat records, but GOPers will tell
> you there is no "global warming" Manatee shiped back from
> Massachusetts to show us our oceans are getting warmer. GOPers that
> make big bucks from oil and coal burning will tell you there is no
> Earth warming and its a conspiracy by "liberals " Oh ya TreBert

I don't know what "GOPers" are. Thermometer deniers (the alarmist
nutcases who say AGW hasn't happened and isn't happening) are not
only motivated by greed and ignorance: many of them are conspiracy
monger nutcases who believe there is a multigenerational
conspiracy of the world's scientists who are out to.. to... well,
they aren't sure what the conspiracy is about, but by golly all
the scientists are in on it.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Synthetic Life Becomes Reality
Next: New Experiments Rattle Space Weather Research