Prev: Deadbeat nation
Next: Mixed-Signal, Bipolar vs CMOS
From: John Larkin on 2 Jun 2010 21:57 On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:27:30 -0700 (PDT), "langwadt(a)fonz.dk" <langwadt(a)fonz.dk> wrote: >On 2 Jun., 20:55, John Larkin ><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> Shot from our conference room: >> >> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Sun_1.jpg >> >> Somebody covered the billboard across the street with plywood, and now >> two guys are working with chisels and mallets to strip away the darker >> surface layer and make an image. >> >> We rented out one window to a time-lapse photographer, who will >> eventually produce a video ad for the sponsor. $500 will fund a pretty >> nice barbeque. >> >> The lighthouse is part of the cafe/car wash. I don't know why they >> need a lighthouse. Across the street is another lighthouse, part of >> the u-store business. Goodwill, on a third corner, has sort of a >> lighthouse too. >> >> John > >why didn't they do the carving before they put it up? would be easy >with a >cnc router too. Not artsy enough? :) Not artsy enough. As far as that goes, why don't they use paint? At the rate they're going, the BP well will be capped before this billboard is done. > >price gas here in Denmark is around twice that > Gas is too cheap in the USA. I don't generally approve of tax increases, but a huge increase in gas tax makes a lot of sense. Proposing it is political suicide, even for the craziest Democrats. John
From: Michael A. Terrell on 2 Jun 2010 21:59 Jim Thompson wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:34:15 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> > wrote: > > >John Larkin wrote: > >> Shot from our conference room: > >> > >> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Sun_1.jpg > >> > >> Somebody covered the billboard across the street with plywood, and now > >> two guys are working with chisels and mallets to strip away the darker > >> surface layer and make an image. > >> > > > >The guy in the left bucket must be pretty brazen. All it takes is a > >minor swipe from a car that veered off the right lane and ... > > > > > >> We rented out one window to a time-lapse photographer, who will > >> eventually produce a video ad for the sponsor. $500 will fund a pretty > >> nice barbeque. > >> > >> The lighthouse is part of the cafe/car wash. I don't know why they > >> need a lighthouse. Across the street is another lighthouse, part of > >> the u-store business. Goodwill, on a third corner, has sort of a > >> lighthouse too. > >> > > > >What happened to the palm tree in front. It doesn't look all that > >healthy. Oh, hey, gas is 6c cheaper out here :-) > > 36� Cheaper here :-) 46� Cheaper here. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: krw on 2 Jun 2010 23:44 On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:57:02 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:27:30 -0700 (PDT), "langwadt(a)fonz.dk" ><langwadt(a)fonz.dk> wrote: > >>On 2 Jun., 20:55, John Larkin >><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> Shot from our conference room: >>> >>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Sun_1.jpg >>> >>> Somebody covered the billboard across the street with plywood, and now >>> two guys are working with chisels and mallets to strip away the darker >>> surface layer and make an image. >>> >>> We rented out one window to a time-lapse photographer, who will >>> eventually produce a video ad for the sponsor. $500 will fund a pretty >>> nice barbeque. >>> >>> The lighthouse is part of the cafe/car wash. I don't know why they >>> need a lighthouse. Across the street is another lighthouse, part of >>> the u-store business. Goodwill, on a third corner, has sort of a >>> lighthouse too. >>> >>> John >> >>why didn't they do the carving before they put it up? would be easy >>with a >>cnc router too. Not artsy enough? :) > >Not artsy enough. > >As far as that goes, why don't they use paint? At the rate they're >going, the BP well will be capped before this billboard is done. > >> >>price gas here in Denmark is around twice that >> > >Gas is too cheap in the USA. I don't generally approve of tax >increases, but a huge increase in gas tax makes a lot of sense. >Proposing it is political suicide, even for the craziest Democrats. It's a great recessive tax, though the government doesn't need any more money. It'll just go even further in debt.
From: John Larkin on 2 Jun 2010 23:54 On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:44:30 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:57:02 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:27:30 -0700 (PDT), "langwadt(a)fonz.dk" >><langwadt(a)fonz.dk> wrote: >> >>>On 2 Jun., 20:55, John Larkin >>><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>> Shot from our conference room: >>>> >>>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Sun_1.jpg >>>> >>>> Somebody covered the billboard across the street with plywood, and now >>>> two guys are working with chisels and mallets to strip away the darker >>>> surface layer and make an image. >>>> >>>> We rented out one window to a time-lapse photographer, who will >>>> eventually produce a video ad for the sponsor. $500 will fund a pretty >>>> nice barbeque. >>>> >>>> The lighthouse is part of the cafe/car wash. I don't know why they >>>> need a lighthouse. Across the street is another lighthouse, part of >>>> the u-store business. Goodwill, on a third corner, has sort of a >>>> lighthouse too. >>>> >>>> John >>> >>>why didn't they do the carving before they put it up? would be easy >>>with a >>>cnc router too. Not artsy enough? :) >> >>Not artsy enough. >> >>As far as that goes, why don't they use paint? At the rate they're >>going, the BP well will be capped before this billboard is done. >> >>> >>>price gas here in Denmark is around twice that >>> >> >>Gas is too cheap in the USA. I don't generally approve of tax >>increases, but a huge increase in gas tax makes a lot of sense. >>Proposing it is political suicide, even for the craziest Democrats. > >It's a great recessive tax, though the government doesn't need any more money. >It'll just go even further in debt. It's not recessive. The tax on every gallon would be the same. Poor folk could even buy Regular and pay less tax than rich folk who buy Premium. They could even buy small, high-mileage cars. John
From: krw on 3 Jun 2010 00:34
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:54:28 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:44:30 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >>On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:57:02 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:27:30 -0700 (PDT), "langwadt(a)fonz.dk" >>><langwadt(a)fonz.dk> wrote: >>> >>>>On 2 Jun., 20:55, John Larkin >>>><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>> Shot from our conference room: >>>>> >>>>> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Sun_1.jpg >>>>> >>>>> Somebody covered the billboard across the street with plywood, and now >>>>> two guys are working with chisels and mallets to strip away the darker >>>>> surface layer and make an image. >>>>> >>>>> We rented out one window to a time-lapse photographer, who will >>>>> eventually produce a video ad for the sponsor. $500 will fund a pretty >>>>> nice barbeque. >>>>> >>>>> The lighthouse is part of the cafe/car wash. I don't know why they >>>>> need a lighthouse. Across the street is another lighthouse, part of >>>>> the u-store business. Goodwill, on a third corner, has sort of a >>>>> lighthouse too. >>>>> >>>>> John >>>> >>>>why didn't they do the carving before they put it up? would be easy >>>>with a >>>>cnc router too. Not artsy enough? :) >>> >>>Not artsy enough. >>> >>>As far as that goes, why don't they use paint? At the rate they're >>>going, the BP well will be capped before this billboard is done. >>> >>>> >>>>price gas here in Denmark is around twice that >>>> >>> >>>Gas is too cheap in the USA. I don't generally approve of tax >>>increases, but a huge increase in gas tax makes a lot of sense. >>>Proposing it is political suicide, even for the craziest Democrats. >> >>It's a great recessive tax, though the government doesn't need any more money. >>It'll just go even further in debt. > >It's not recessive. Sorry, "regressive". >The tax on every gallon would be the same. That's like saying a flat tax isn't "regressive" (technically it's neutral, but...) >Poor >folk could even buy Regular and pay less tax than rich folk who buy >Premium. They could even buy small, high-mileage cars. The tax today is per gallon, not percentage. "Poor folk" often have old beaters, which are more often than not gas-guzzlers. But that doesn't alter the fact that the government spends far too much money now. They don't need more smack. |