From: Michael on
On Apr 29, 4:28 am, "TheM" <DontNeedS...(a)test.com> wrote:
> >"Michael" <mrdarr...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:f4d5b530-1b2b-4fb8-b8a7-
>
> >California's bond ratings are rock solid in comparison...
> >http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/ratings/history.asp
>
> >Shocking.
>
> >Michael
>
> But California is even deeper in debts, 200% their BDP is it?
>
> M


Some $50 billion at last count.

BDP... what's that? The GSP is something like $2 trillion... can that
be right? Seems kind of high...
From: Michael on
On Apr 29, 2:11 am, Martin Brown <|||newspam...(a)nezumi.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
> John Larkin wrote:
> >http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100428/D9FC0ES80.html
>
> > Europe has an interesting dynamic. Multiple countries share a
> > currency. So if one country, especially a small one, decides to spend
> > more than they have, the other, presumably more prudent countries,
> > wind up paying for it.
>
> Greece should never have been allowed into the Euro in the first place.
> Their books were seriously cooked to qualify. Now the chickens come home
> to roost - looks like Germany will be footing the bill.


And Germany doesn't mind?

Michael
From: krw on
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:31:05 -0700 (PDT), Michael <mrdarrett(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 29, 4:28�am, "TheM" <DontNeedS...(a)test.com> wrote:
>> >"Michael" <mrdarr...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:f4d5b530-1b2b-4fb8-b8a7-
>>
>> >California's bond ratings are rock solid in comparison...
>> >http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/ratings/history.asp
>>
>> >Shocking.
>>
>> >Michael
>>
>> But California is even deeper in debts, 200% their BDP is it?
>>
>> M
>
>
>Some $50 billion at last count.

That's the budget deficit, this year. The unfunded debt is much higher.

>BDP... what's that? The GSP is something like $2 trillion... can that
>be right? Seems kind of high...

CA is something like 15% of the GDP, so that's about right. Their unfunded
obligations closer to $500B to $700B, or so it's reported.
From: dagmargoodboat on
On Apr 28, 11:00 am, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100428/D9FC0ES80.html
>
> Europe has an interesting dynamic. Multiple countries share a
> currency. So if one country, especially a small one, decides to spend
> more than they have, the other, presumably more prudent countries,
> wind up paying for it.
>
> In a single country with a single currency like the US, if we spend
> more than we have, we'll print money to cover it, and everybody in all
> the 50 states shares in the resulting inflation.

I wrote a couple weeks ago that Bernanke swears he absolutely will not
monetize (print money to pay) the debt.

I met a BLS economist. He says that, in fact, is what Bernanke's
doing.

Me? Dunno. That sure would be ugly.

--
Cheers,
James Arthur
From: John Larkin on
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:57:05 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat(a)yahoo.com
wrote:

>On Apr 28, 11:00�am, John Larkin
><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100428/D9FC0ES80.html
>>
>> Europe has an interesting dynamic. Multiple countries share a
>> currency. So if one country, especially a small one, decides to spend
>> more than they have, the other, presumably more prudent countries,
>> wind up paying for it.
>>
>> In a single country with a single currency like the US, if we spend
>> more than we have, we'll print money to cover it, and everybody in all
>> the 50 states shares in the resulting inflation.
>
>I wrote a couple weeks ago that Bernanke swears he absolutely will not
>monetize (print money to pay) the debt.

Well, somebody sure will.

John