From: mark on 8 Sep 2009 16:05 On Sep 8, 8:37 pm, Dennis Ferguson <dcfergu...(a)pacbell.net> wrote: > On 2009-09-08, Jono <notha...(a)blueyonder.invalid> wrote: > > > on 08/09/2009, Bob Eager supposed : > >> You missed it.... > > >> http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.15391 > > >> Might or might not be suitable but take another look...there may be more. > > > Do they not require a licence in the UK? (and only the mobile phone > > companies can apply?) > > Do mobile phones require individual licences in the UK, or do > they just need type approval with their use being otherwise > covered by the carriers' spectrum licences? Am I doing > something wrong by using phones I bought in Hong Kong? > > The use of the spectrum by a repeater really isn't all > that different than use of the spectrum by a mobile phone, > so I would think that using the repeater legally should > not require anything beyond what you need to do to use a > mobile phone legally. I do think the spectrum licence > holder has the right to object to your use of any particular > kind of equipment in their spectrum, but if the man goes > to the trouble of buying equipment and installing and > cabling an outdoor antenna to improve the crappy service > at his house to the point where he can use it, would the > carrier really tell him he can't do that and needs to > live with their crappy service the way it is instead? > > Dennis Ferguson I guess from a simplistic point of view handsets adhere to strict power control guidelines. So long as the repeaters do the same then I assume that there will not be an issue. Cheers, Mark
From: Jono on 8 Sep 2009 16:43 After serious thinking mark wrote : > To my mind data over femtocell is dubious as the subscriber is paying > already for a DSL connection so why would the subscriber want to pay > additonal charges for data over femotcell to Vodafone. > > Cheers, > Mark Push email? in the absence of WiFi, of course.
From: Chris Blunt on 8 Sep 2009 18:08 On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:05:48 -0700 (PDT), mark <marpate2(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Sep 8, 8:37�pm, Dennis Ferguson <dcfergu...(a)pacbell.net> wrote: >> On 2009-09-08, Jono <notha...(a)blueyonder.invalid> wrote: >> >> > on 08/09/2009, Bob Eager supposed : >> >> You missed it.... >> >> >> �http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.15391 >> >> >> Might or might not be suitable but take another look...there may be more. >> >> > Do they not require a licence in the UK? (and only the mobile phone >> > companies can apply?) >> >> Do mobile phones require individual licences in the UK, or do >> they just need type approval with their use being otherwise >> covered by the carriers' spectrum licences? �Am I doing >> something wrong by using phones I bought in Hong Kong? >> >> The use of the spectrum by a repeater really isn't all >> that different than use of the spectrum by a mobile phone, >> so I would think that using the repeater legally should >> not require anything beyond what you need to do to use a >> mobile phone legally. �I do think the spectrum licence >> holder has the right to object to your use of any particular >> kind of equipment in their spectrum, but if the man goes >> to the trouble of buying equipment and installing and >> cabling an outdoor antenna to improve the crappy service >> at his house to the point where he can use it, would the >> carrier really tell him he can't do that and needs to >> live with their crappy service the way it is instead? >> >> Dennis Ferguson > >I guess from a simplistic point of view handsets adhere to strict >power control guidelines. So long as the repeaters do the same then I >assume that there will not be an issue. But it is an issue because they're illegal. Mobile phones are covered by a general exemption to the Wireless Telegraphy Act because they operate in a very specific way. Repeaters perform a completely different function which is outside the scope of the exemption and are therefore illegal. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/enforcement/jammers/ Chris
From: Jono on 9 Sep 2009 02:57 Rupert Moss-Eccardt brought next idea : > Bob Eager wrote: >> On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:37:24 +0100, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote: >> >>>> Get over to DealExtreme and buy a home mobile repeater system. One >>>> aerial outside, one in the house. Two way boost for your mobile. Or >>>> you could make your own passive repeater with nothing more than two >>>> aerials and coax. >>> DealExtreme.co.uk seems off-air at the moment and .com doesn't seem to >>> have such things. Any hints of elsewhere? >> >> You missed it.... >> >> http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.15391 >> >> Might or might not be suitable but take another look...there may be more. > > Ah thanks! > > Didn't think to search for amplifier. I'll stick with the Femtocell: "Repeater devices transmit or re-transmit in the cellular frequency bands. Only the mobile network operators are licensed to use equipment that transmits in these bands. Installation or use of repeater devices by anyone without a licence is a criminal offence under Section 8 of the WT Act 2006. Any person found guilty of installing or using such devices without a licence would be liable on conviction to a fine of up to £5000 and/or up to 51 weeks' imprisonment (Six months in Scotland and Northern Ireland)" From the link http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/enforcement/jammers/ provided by Chris Blunt in another post.
From: mark on 9 Sep 2009 03:27 On Sep 8, 11:08 pm, Chris Blunt <m...(a)nospam.com> wrote: > But it is an issue because they're illegal. > > Mobile phones are covered by a general exemption to the Wireless > Telegraphy Act because they operate in a very specific way. Repeaters > perform a completely different function which is outside the scope of > the exemption and are therefore illegal. > > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/enforcement/jammers/ > > Chris Well that pretty much closes the arument then :) Cheers, Mark
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: New LogMeIn App for Iphone to Access PC Remotely Next: eCall System (Was: 999 call nonsense?) |