Prev: Kip Thorne. Objects do not fall faster than light in a blackhole
Next: Energy is never pushed faster than light by gravity
From: Michael Moroney on 4 Aug 2010 18:13
On Aug 4, 1:29=A0pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:

> Is *that* a prediction, PD?

It is a most excellent word salad. Dee-lish!
From: PD on 4 Aug 2010 18:17
On Aug 4, 12:29 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
> The neutrinos released by fusion within
> stars go right through matter but impact
> 100% on galactic centers. They constitute
> the from-everywhere flux that drives the
> movement of the galaxies themselves.
>
> Similar radiation of a much smaller scale
> is released from millions of points of fusion within
> each electron. This is the from-everywhere flux
> that drives the movement of atoms.
>
> The smaller-scale radiation travels faster, so
> the matter surrounding galactic centers will
> gravitate faster than the centers themselves.
>
> Is *that* a prediction, PD?


Not quite yet. When you say the matter surrounding galactic centers
will "gravitate faster" than the centers themselves, what does this
mean in terms of measurable observations?

Does it mean that the orbits of stars further out from the galactic
centers will show a faster-than-expected orbital period than ones
further in? Or what?

>
> john
> galaxy model

From: john on 4 Aug 2010 22:03
On Aug 4, 4:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 12:29 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > The neutrinos released by fusion within
> > stars go right through matter but impact
> > 100% on galactic centers. They constitute
> > the from-everywhere flux that drives the
> > movement of the galaxies themselves.
>
> > Similar radiation of a much smaller scale
> > is released from millions of points of fusion within
> > each electron. This is the from-everywhere flux
> > that drives the movement of atoms.
>
> > The smaller-scale radiation travels faster, so
> > the matter surrounding galactic centers will
> > gravitate faster than the centers themselves.
>
> > Is *that* a prediction, PD?
>
> Not quite yet. When you say the matter surrounding galactic centers
> will "gravitate faster" than the centers themselves, what does this
> mean in terms of measurable observations?
>
> Does it mean that the orbits of stars further out from the galactic
> centers will show a faster-than-expected orbital period than ones
> further in? Or what?
>
>
>
It means the stuff surrounding each
center can move faster than the center.

It makes sense, really, for otherwise it
would get lost.

I don't know how it would show up.

john
From: PD on 5 Aug 2010 09:30
On Aug 4, 9:03 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 4:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 4, 12:29 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
> > > The neutrinos released by fusion within
> > > stars go right through matter but impact
> > > 100% on galactic centers. They constitute
> > > the from-everywhere flux that drives the
> > > movement of the galaxies themselves.
>
> > > Similar radiation of a much smaller scale
> > > is released from millions of points of fusion within
> > > each electron. This is the from-everywhere flux
> > > that drives the movement of atoms.
>
> > > The smaller-scale radiation travels faster, so
> > > the matter surrounding galactic centers will
> > > gravitate faster than the centers themselves.
>
> > > Is *that* a prediction, PD?
>
> > Not quite yet. When you say the matter surrounding galactic centers
> > will "gravitate faster" than the centers themselves, what does this
> > mean in terms of measurable observations?
>
> > Does it mean that the orbits of stars further out from the galactic
> > centers will show a faster-than-expected orbital period than ones
> > further in? Or what?
>
> It means the stuff surrounding each
> center can move faster than the center.
>
> It makes sense, really, for otherwise it
> would get lost.
>
> I don't know how it would show up.

Then it's not a prediction, John.

A prediction means a distinguishable *observation* that would be
unique to your model. This means a measurable behavior, preferably a
predicted curve that you expect all the measurements to lie upon. The
curve comes from a relationship between two measured properties, where
the measurements yield numbers. It's of the following sort: "For each
batch of stuff near the center, you measure quantities X and Y. The
model says that for the batch of stuff that has X=39, then you expect
for that same batch of stuff that Y=188. It says that the batch of
stuff that has X=57 will have Y=101."

THAT is a prediction, John.

>
> john

From: Y.Porat on 5 Aug 2010 11:02
On Aug 4, 8:26 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 12:13 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 8/4/10 12:29 PM, john wrote:
>
> > > The neutrinos released by fusion within
> > > stars go right through matter but impact
> > > 100% on galactic centers. They constitute
> > > the from-everywhere flux that drives the
> > > movement of the galaxies themselves.
>
> > > Similar radiation of a much smaller scale
> > > is released from millions of points of fusion within
> > > each electron. This is the from-everywhere flux
> > > that drives the movement of atoms.
>
> > > The smaller-scale radiation travels faster, so
> > > the matter surrounding galactic centers will
> > > gravitate faster than the centers themselves.
>
> > > Is *that* a prediction, PD?
>
> > > john
> > > galaxy model
>
> >    Stooopid is as stooopid posts.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Explain to me why that is stupid, Sam.
> Are you saying there can be only one scale
> of radiation?
>
> john

--------------
better talk about the 'Circlon''

it makes continuous gradual force
inversely proportional to the distance from mass

Y.P
-----------------------
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Kip Thorne. Objects do not fall faster than light in a blackhole
Next: Energy is never pushed faster than light by gravity