Prev: Kip Thorne. Objects do not fall faster than light in a blackhole
Next: Energy is never pushed faster than light by gravity
From: Autymn D. C. on 6 Aug 2010 08:01
On Aug 5, 12:11 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > F**k, man, both of those are
> > impossibilities, as is suck gravity, BHs, DM,
> > and just about every other part of today's
> > story.
>
> I'm still curious why you are so convinced that lack of volume,
> attractive forces, black holes, dark matter, and other things from
> today's story are just flat impossibilities. There's nothing self-
> contradictory about them, and whether they are possible or not hinges
> on whether they are compatible with experimental measurements.

Lack of bulk and black holes are very self-contradictory, and do not
conform to any experimental measurements.

-Aut
From: PD on 6 Aug 2010 08:44
On Aug 5, 5:37 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote:
> PD says:
>
> 'I'm still curious why you are so convinced that lack of volume,
> attractive forces, black holes, dark matter, and other things from
> today's story are just flat impossibilities. There's nothing self-
> contradictory about them, and whether they are possible or not hinges
> on whether they are compatible with experimental measurements.
> Consistency with your common sense just does not enter into an
> evaluation of impossibility at all. Why would it? '
>
> Apparently it doesn't.

Exactly. And yet you seem to think it should.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Kip Thorne. Objects do not fall faster than light in a blackhole
Next: Energy is never pushed faster than light by gravity