From: David Empson on 5 May 2010 16:37 JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot(a)vaxination.ca> wrote: > SpreadTooThin wrote: > > My hard drive crashed... I'm in single user mode. I did the fsck and > > it gave an error indicating the drive was bed. > > What is the exact error message you got ? > > Remember that when boot into single user mode, by default the disk is > mounted read-only, you need to mount it manually to get read-write > (which is needed for fsck to do it job). The instructions to mount it > are displayed when you boot into single user mode. Not exactly. As the instructions in single user mode say, you are supposed to run fsck _before_ mounting the drive with write access. The entire point is that it can find and fix minor errors before you risk modifying anything. fsck will be able to repair errors even if the drive is mounted read-only. (It automatically mounts the drive read-write for its own use, then restores the original mount method.) > > I do an ls and I can see all my files. > > Looks like the disk is still usable. When you boot form the install > DVDs, does it give any error message on why it can't fix it ? It will probably be the same error as fsck, since Disk Utility and fsck use the same mechanism to verify/repair an HFS+ volume. > > I can't ftp .... apparently... > > Doubt this is functional in single user mode. > > > Can I connect a usb key and mount it and try copying some files over? > > boot DVD? Disk Utility? > > I *think* you should be able to mount a USB key. But you will need to > use the mount command manually because the process which automatically > mounts stuff for you isn't running. Not sure what the "mount" command > syntax is for mounting USB drives. I don't know about that either. Best options would be: 1. Restore as much as possible from your backup rather than trying to extract it from the corrupted or damaged hard drive. Don't have a backup? Right. 2. Assuming both computers have Firewire, you can put the old one into Firewire Target Mode and connect it to the new one to access any files on it. The main catch is that this could result in corrupting the hard drive further, depending on the degree of damage. What is the error message reported by fsck? To protect against this, you need a utility like DiskWarrior, which you can run on the new computer, then while in DiskWarrior, connect the old computer (in Firewire Target Mode), and use DiskWarrior to repair its directory, at least to the point where it has reported the problems it found and offers to mount a temporary read-only copy of the repaired directory. You can use that to copy files off the old computer. Once you've copied everything, you can proceed with attempting to repair the drive. An alternative is Data Rescue, which does the copying for you, trying to salvage everything it can find from the damaged drive, _without_ attempting to repair it or write to it in any way. -- David Empson dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz
From: ZenMaster-Flash on 5 May 2010 20:13 The hard disc is probably 100% usable. Your directory is damaged and needs to be REPLACED. Disc utility cannot REPLACE. It repairs minor corruption only. The best FIX is via Disk Warrior Next best is Drive Genius 2.3 TechToolPro5.0/7 also does a decent job of it. NOT having these bootable DVD's at hand is ill advised.
From: David Empson on 5 May 2010 22:00 ZenMaster-Flash <flash1296(a)gmail.com> wrote: > The hard disc is probably 100% usable. We don't know that for certain, as we haven't seen what error message was reported, and the OP hasn't run any kind of surface scan yet. The hard drive might have a physical defect resulting in I/O errors. > Your directory is damaged and needs to be REPLACED. > Disc utility cannot REPLACE. It repairs minor corruption only. > > The best FIX is via Disk Warrior Debatable. If the fault is _only_ directory corruption, _and_ DiskWarrior's trial repair produces good results then DiskWarrior is the best solution. If there is major corruption, DiskWarrior (or any other repair tool) may overwrite important data when trying to repair the directory (which at least in DiskWarrior's case only happens after you've told it to go ahead and write the repaired directory, so you have a chance to inspect the results first). In cases of major corruption I prefer Data Rescue, as it doesn't even try to fix the damaged volume - it just copies as much as it can to another drive. In cases of major physical defects, you are better off using a professional data recovery service, as any repair attempt (even just powering on the hard drive) could do more damage. > Next best is Drive Genius 2.3 > TechToolPro5.0/7 also does a decent job of it. > > NOT having these bootable DVD's at hand is ill advised. -- David Empson dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz
From: Warren Oates on 6 May 2010 08:28 In article <1ji2p19.13gb4p65xk48oN%dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz>, dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) wrote: > In cases of major physical defects, you are better off using a > professional data recovery service, as any repair attempt (even just > powering on the hard drive) could do more damage. Nah, put it in the freezer ... -- Very old woody beets will never cook tender. -- Fannie Farmer
From: Jolly Roger on 6 May 2010 12:53 In article <1ji2p19.13gb4p65xk48oN%dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz>, dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) wrote: > In cases of major corruption I prefer Data Rescue, as it doesn't even > try to fix the damaged volume - it just copies as much as it can to > another drive. A friend of mine recently recommended CopyCatX for this. I wonder how it compares to DataRescue. -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: No Firewire on iPad!!!??? Next: Latest Chrome Beta is available |